IL VOSTRO NEMICO NON E' LA RUSSIA, SONO LE CLASSI DIRIGENTI EUROPEE CHE SI NASCONDONO DIETRO IL DITO DELLA UE & COMPAGNIA CANTANTE DELLE ORGANIZZAZIONI INTERNAZIONALI. IL WEF COORDINA IL TUTTO. L'OBIETTIVO? DEPRIVARVI PER SEMPRE DEI DIRITTI UMANI, CIVILI, POLITICI E CANCELLARE LA PAROLA DEMOCRAZIA DAL DIZIONARIO.

 

EU Resists US Pressure to Weaken Censorship Laws Amid Escalating Trade Tensions

The European Union has condemned mounting US pressure to weaken its regulations on disinformation as an attack on its "regulatory sovereignty." The conflict, which has intensified in recent months, revolves around stringent EU rules that require major social media companies such as X, Google, Facebook, Apple, and Amazon to combat the spread of “false” information online. The Trump administration, backed by tech moguls including Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, is pushing Brussels to relax these measures or risk facing harsh economic consequences. Washington argues that the EU’s regulations unfairly target American companies and amount to an attempt to censor free speech, a claim European officials strongly reject. For Brussels, this dispute isn’t a trade disagreement — it’s a direct challenge to the European Commission’s authority. "If needed, the EU will respond swiftly and decisively to defend its rights and regulatory autonomy against unjustified measures," said Thomas Regnier, the Commission’s spokesperson for tech sovereignty last month. The European Commission insists that its Digital Services Act (DSA) is designed to ensure transparency and accountability for tech giants, rather than suppress lawful content. Yet, you wouldn’t know that from reading the text of the actual proposals. The confrontation took a sharp turn in February when President Trump issued a memorandum warning of tariffs against nations imposing “overseas extortion and unfair fines and penalties” on American tech firms. This was followed by Vice President JD Vance’s speech in Munich, where he likened European regulators to Soviet-era censors, suggesting that their policies were designed to stifle free speech under the guise of combating misinformation. Adding fuel to the fire, Elon Musk, now part of the Trump administration, posted an image of the EU flag altered to feature a hammer and sickle, accompanied by the tagline: “Imagine you love so much being governed that you want a government for your government.” The message was a clear shot at the EU’s assertive regulatory stance.

The European Commission remains steadfast in defending what it calls the “Brussels effect,” the global influence exerted by its regulatory framework. “If needed, the EU will respond swiftly and decisively to defend its rights and regulatory autonomy against unjustified measures,” said Regnier. Brussels views external pressure to alter its digital laws as an attack on its ability to govern its own market. In response to Washington’s tariffs, Brussels has already imposed countermeasures on American products such as bourbon and Harley-Davidson motorcycles. Trump, in turn, threatened a 200% tariff on French wine and champagne, raising concerns that economic retaliation would escalate further. Former UK trade policy adviser Allie Renison predicts that social media regulation will remain a major flashpoint in US-EU relations. “The White House considers this to be both an attempt to clip the wings of successful American companies and a censorship issue,” she noted to the Telegraph, suggesting that Washington will use these grievances to justify punitive trade policies against Europe. Friedrich Merz, Germany’s incoming chancellor, is expected to take a hard stance against the US push for Europe to change its censorship laws. After an election marked by concerns over online disinformation, Merz criticized Trump and Musk, comparing their interference to that of Moscow. His remarks followed Musk’s apparent support for Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which secured a historic second-place finish in the elections. EU officials, however, reject the notion that the DSA infringes on free speech. They argue that it merely requires platforms to mitigate systemic risks like disinformation and illegal content while safeguarding users’ rights. Michael McGrath, the EU’s justice commissioner, insisted, “The DSA is absolutely not about censorship, it’s in many respects the opposite.” For its part, the European Commission retains sweeping enforcement powers under the DSA, including the ability to impose heavy fines or, in extreme cases, suspend services. Beyond the EU, Britain is also expected to face US pressure over its Online Safety Act, which mandates harsh penalties for social media firms that fail to remove harmful content. Experts anticipate that US trade negotiators will demand revisions to the law as part of any economic agreement between Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. “While the US and UK appear to have common ground on taking a more pro-innovation approach to AI regulation than the EU, our government is not out of sight,” Renison warned, predicting that Britain’s online safety measures will be a sticking point in future trade negotiations.