Antonio Lombardi è il titolare di quella che, secondo classificazione europea, è una piccola impresa italiana del comparto edile. Nel corso dei primi mesi della pandemia, e nel caos della ricerca ai dispositivi di protezione, il governo aveva fatto trapelare la possibilità di convertire alcune di queste imprese per la produzione di mascherine, con tanto di bando che prende il via il 26 marzo 2020.
Per bocca dello stesso Domenico Arcuri, commissario straordinario all’emergenza, la N.F.J. Srl. insieme ad altre imprese italiane, si mettono in moto per partecipare al bando: “Arcuri in una conferenza aveva detto che avrebbero comprato tutto ciò che avremmo prodotto”, dice Lombardi, “dopo aver fatto le valutazioni di rischio per l’investimento, concludemmo tutto intorno ai primi di luglio”. Poi però, l’intoppo: “Di ordini alle aziende dal governo non ne sono mai arrivati“. Come mai? Difficile a dirsi, ma l’audito ha un sospetto. “Ho offerto questo prodotto a 22 centesimi, ma mentre ci indebitavamo gruppi più grandi godevano di alcuni trattamenti di favore”.
Quali favori?
Di che gruppi più grandi parliamo? “Per esempio a FCA venivano concesse in comodo d’uso gratuito le macchine di produzione“. Proprio così: non è un segreto che nel corso dell’intero periodo pandemico FCA abbia prodotto le mascherine, che così potevano essere vendute a un prezzo molto più concorrenziale, rispetto a una piccola impresa. Le opposizioni alla testimonianza di Lombardi però non sono mancate presso l’Aula del III piano di Palazzo San Macuto: tra chi ha chiesto se le sue mascherine fossero a regola e chi ha paventato che potesse essere stata fatta una valutazione troppo leggera sul rischio dell’investimento, c’è anche chi ha trovato documenti ufficiali in cui si asserisce che il Commissario all’emergenza deve esplicitamente contattare l’impresa perché quest’ultima si assuma il rischio di investire.
Non tutto però va in modo regolare nel corso della seduta secondo il presidente Marco Lisei: dopo il battibecco con il grillino Colucci il silenzio cala improvvisamente (VIDEO).
One inherent danger of biometric identification is that the data cannot be altered if compromised, such as with a database hack.
Another danger is that the biometric data, such as fingerprints, could be copied and left on a staged crime scene, implicating targeted individuals. Facial recognition images could be fed into A.I. software to create fake surveillance camera video of a targeted individual conducting a crime.
Image Credit: Jackie Niam / Getty
SHARE
LIVE
Numerous third world countries are continuing the global push of implementing biometric identification systems for their citizens and incorporate these systems into digital ID smartphone apps for increased tracking abilities. Behind this push are globalist organizations such as the World Bank and the World Economic Forum. Notably, a digital ID app could be theoretically shut off if the user fails to meet specific requirements, such as vaccination update schedules, although this has not happened, yet.
The ID4AFRICA event going on between May 20-23 in Ethiopia “unites the global identity community to advance the ID4D agenda, and to explore how digital identity and aligned services can support Africa’s socio-economic development and individual empowerment.”
Language on the site says that ‘stakeholders’ are able to attend the event – the word ‘stakeholder’ likely referencing the new globalist economy of ‘stakeholder capitalism‘ that the World Economic Forum promotes.
“The ID4Africa AGM welcomes participation from all stakeholder groups,” the ID4AFRICA about page said.
“According to the ID4D Dataset, approximately 850 million people lack official ID, and 3.3 billion do not have access to digital ID for official transactions online. The ID4D Initiative works with countries towards reducing this staggering number, and ensure that identification systems are accessible, protect people’s rights and data, and capable of facilitating transactions in the digital age,” the organization said.
In addition to Ghana, Venezuela, Ivory Coast, Edo State, Nigeria and Iraq which take biometrics of voters, a number of other third world countries are now implementing systems which are wider reaching in both scope and use case.
Regarding African nations, numerous stats and figures were discussed at the ID4AFRICA event which reveal the progression of these identification systems in the third world continent, according to Biometric Update.
“One curious ambition is Somalia’s where the country launched its national digital ID system only two years ago with the help of Pakistan’s National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA), but is hoping to enroll 15 million citizens by the end of this year.”
“For Mauritania, the country has been able to enroll more than 94 percent of the population for national ID since a new ID system was put in place in 2020.”
“Tanzania’s Director of ID management at the National Identification Authority (NIDA), Edson Guyai, said the country, as of today, has registered over 25 million individuals for the national ID, which accounts for 81 percent of the adult population. He added that so far, the ID system has been integrated by over 124 public and private institutions with verification services having generated around $45.4 million.”
“Benin’s own story was told by the Director General of the National Agency for the Identification of Persons, Aristide Adjinacou, who explained the country’s journey in transforming identity management and civil registration. “Our story is one of bold reforms, deep integration, and pragmatic innovation,” he said, citing the numerous national ID reforms which have taken place in the country since 2016.”
“The Principal Secretary of Malawi’s National Registration Bureau, Mphatso Sambo, took attendees through his country’s ID experience. He said between 2015 and 2025, Malawi has undergone huge evolution in terms of modernizing its ID architecture through several efforts including enhancing ID access in rural communities, push for child registration, and putting in place a sustainable financing and management plan.”
Additionally, Namibia has already established a biometric identification program and is working to roll out a digital ID system.
Uganda is now targeting 33 million citizens for “mass ID registration” that includes iris scanning. The program will begin May 27.
Liberia has now made it mandatory for all citizens and residents to enroll in the National Biometric Identification System (NBIS) which includes fingerprinting.
Outside of Africa, other third world countries are implementing similar systems.
Cambodia updated their ID card registration process to include the collection of fingerprints, iris scans, face biometrics and voice prints.
Guyana is preparing to issue their new biometric ID cards and is planning on a digital ID system as well.
Sri Lanka is working on a biometric identification card which includes fingerprint, iris and facial recognition technologies.
Pakistan has updated their biometric identification system to work with a new digital ID system.
Mexico is rolling out a biometric identification system which includes fingerprints, iris scans and facial recognition photographs.
While not exactly a third world country, Greece launched a digital ID for children to access, or not access, age-restricted content.
Numerous first would countries such as the U.K. and most U.S. states have launched similar programs, with most European countries already collecting biometrics on all their citizens and visitors for identification, while financial institutions like Visa and MasterCard are taking the biometric plunge as well.
One inherent danger of biometric identification is that the data cannot be altered if compromised, such as with a database hack.
Another danger is that the biometric data, such as fingerprints, could be copied and left on a staged crime scene, implicating targeted individuals. Facial recognition images could be fed into A.I. software to create fake surveillance camera video of a targeted individual conducting a crime.
After the full global implementation of biometric systems has taken effect and these facts become apparent, a likely scenario will be a new push for the global microchip implantation of the human race, as microchips can have their information altered upon being compromised.
American company VeriChip Corporation developed an early version of this system when they debuted an implantable human microchip called the VeriChip in the early 2000s with the express purpose of identifying patients in the medical setting as well as identifying children.
“The VeriChip is injected under the skin of the upper arm or hip in an outpatient procedure. A special scanner reads the RF signal emitted by the microchip to obtain the device’s ID number, which then is entered into a database to access personal data about the individual,” Wired Magazine said in 2003. “Other potential uses of the chip, according to company officials, include scanning unconscious patients to obtain their medical records or restricting access to high-security buildings by scanning workers to verify their clearance.”
While identifying people through more secure methods is not inherently malicious, the problem arises with the agendas and motives of the individuals in control of these systems.
Biometric verification of patients is not limited to the third world however. Numerous health systems in the U.S. use biometric systems to verify patients on check-in.
While these systems can reduce medical errors due to mixups of patient records, when tied to a biometric identification card that's required to access services from financial institutions or the government, failure to comply with vaccination mandates may result in inability to deposit a check, withdraw cash, purchase property or drive a car, in theory.
Image Credit: Andriy Onufriyenko / Getty
SHARE
LIVE
The nonprofit biometric technology company Simprints welcomed Gavi CEO Dr. Sania Nishtar on a visit to Ghana to witness vaccination verification via biometric scanning. Gavi (The Vaccine Alliance) states their agenda is “Leaving no one behind with immunization.” One of Gavi’s founding members is the Gates Foundation.
African countries are rapidly adopting biometric systems which scan citizens faces, fingerprints, eyeballs and occasionally voices to verify their identity. These identification systems are also being tied to digital ID smartphone apps. The systems are necessary for conducting regular business and life activities such as opening a bank account, purchasing property, driving, receiving medical care, filing taxes and many others. In addition to these activities, a person’s biometrics may now be tied to their vaccination record.
“Ghana has been leading the way in the adoption of new tools like biometrics to improve patient identification. The Ghana Health Service (GHS) has collaborated with Simprints to use privacy-first biometric ID within its digital health registries to track the delivery of routine immunizations and boost coverage rates,” Biometric Update said. “Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance is a public-private global health partnership that aims to increase access to immunization in low income countries. Simprints CEO Toby Norman said it was an honor to welcome Dr. Nishtar to see their technology in action in clinics.”
Due to many people in the third world African nation living effectively outdoors in remote areas and lacking basic civilizational standards, entrusting the citizenry to hold on to paper vaccination records is not an effective option. Due to the nation’s burgeoning interest in biometrics however, the notion of linking a persons fingerprints and face scan to a digital, online, medical record containing vaccinations is not a surprise. Regardless of the Ghanan’s possessions or lack thereof, a scan of their biometrics will reveal if they had been vaccinated.
“In partnership with Ghana’s Ministry of Health, we’re deploying Simprints privacy-first biometric ID to trace the delivery of malaria and routine immunizations to rapidly identify dropouts or zero-dose children,” Simprints CEO Toby Norman said.
Simprints’ technology enabled the creation of more than 65,000 unique medical records in Ghana, although worldwide in 2024 the firm delivered more than 551,000 biometrically verified health services.
Biometric verification of patients is not limited to the third world however. Numerous health systems in the U.S. use biometric systems from other manufacturers to verify patients on check-in, linking their bodies to their medical records and thus vaccinations.
While these systems can reduce medical errors due to mixups of patient records, when tied to a biometric identification card that’s required to access services from financial institutions or the government, failure to comply with vaccination mandates may result in inability to deposit a check, withdraw cash, purchase property or drive a car, in theory.
ROMA, 22 MAG – “La preoccupazione dei giovani per il futuro del pianeta va guardata con considerazione: la loro coscienza ambientale, fondata su rispetto, responsabilità e impegno quotidiano, è una risorsa essenziale per una società più consapevole, che sappia custodire e valorizzare la ricchezza della biodiversità, nell’interesse dell’umanità”. Lo afferma il presidente della Repubblica, Sergio Mattarella, in un passaggio del messaggio in occasione della giornata mondiale della Biodiversità. (ANSA)
The “safe and effective” narrative collapsed on camera during Senator Ron Johnson’s explosive Senate hearing on COVID-19 vaccine injuries Wednesday afternoon.
Senator Ron Johnson brought the receipts, exposing how the Biden administration DELIBERATELY hid vaccine harms from the public.
Then Dr. James Thorp (OB-GYN) revealed miscarriage data so disturbing, it left the room silent.
This is the Senate hearing they never wanted you to see. I turned three hours of footage into a five-minute read.
Senator Ron Johnson opened the hearing with a bombshell: the Biden administration knew about deadly heart risks tied to the COVID shots, and deliberately kept it from the public.
Johnson released newly subpoenaed records exposing a detailed timeline of what officials knew and when. While Pfizer and Moderna received insider updates, doctors and citizens who raised concerns were silenced.
In February 2021, Israeli health officials warned the CDC of “large reports of myocarditis, particularly in young people” following Pfizer injections, just two and a half months after the vaccine received emergency use authorization.
By April, the CDC was already reviewing myocarditis data from Israel and the Department of Defense. But instead of alerting the public, they stayed quiet.
By the end of that month, VAERS had recorded 2,926 deaths, nearly half of which occurred within three days of injection. “Somebody ought to be looking at it,” Johnson said.
In May, the CDC considered issuing a formal health alert—but scrapped it. They replaced it with watered-down guidance that removed a key warning for doctors to restrict physical activity in myocarditis patients.
Francis Collins, then director of the NIH, brushed it all off. “Senator, people die,” he told Johnson.
In just six months, the toll was staggering: 384,270 reports of adverse events, 4,812 deaths, and 1,736 of those occurred within just 48 hours of injection.
Dr. Peter McCullough then took the floor and upended the narrative that vaccine-induced myocarditis is “rare.”
Before COVID, McCullough had seen just two myocarditis cases in his entire career. After the rollout, everything changed.
He says he’s now “examined thousands of patients with this problem.”
“There’s 1,065 papers in the peer-reviewed literature on COVID vaccine myocarditis,” he explained, pointing to a 2021 case published in the New England Journal of Medicine. A 42-year-old man developed vaccine-induced myocarditis. “The infection is ruled out,” McCullough said. “It’s the vaccine.” Three days after his Moderna shot, the man was dead.
McCullough cited a shocking case from Korea—a young man who died within eight hours of hospitalization after a Pfizer shot. His heart had been, in McCullough’s words, “fried with inflammation.”
Then came a case from Connecticut: two teenage boys, 16 and 17, died in their sleep just days after Pfizer. Their parents found them unresponsive.
“These cases… should have gotten everyone’s attention,” McCullough said. “We should never have someone die after taking a vaccine that’s directly caused to the vaccine.”
Alabama-based physician Dr. Jordan Vaughn followed up with a chilling estimate—up to 15 million Americans may be suffering from long COVID or COVID vaccine injuries.
He now treats teenagers who can’t stand up and previously healthy adults who are suffering strokes with no clear cause.
According to Vaughn, the spike protein’s S1 subunit is far from harmless. “It triggers inflammation, it disrupts endothelial barriers, it induces fibrin resistant to breakdown, and it promotes a lot of amyloid aggregates,” he said.
These effects impair oxygen delivery, damage blood vessels, and trigger a wave of symptoms—racing heart, brain fog, shortness of breath, and post-exertional crashes.
In his clinic, Vaughn uses immunofluorescent microscopy to detect the spike protein’s damage, showing up in patients who were once thriving.
He warned that the mRNA injections led to uncontrolled spike protein production, which spread throughout the body, reaching the heart, brain, ovaries, and testes.
Regulators claimed the vaccine stayed in the arm. That was a lie. A Yale study now shows some people are still producing spike protein more than 700 days after their last injection.
We didn’t just inject people. We turned them into spike protein factories.
Post
