GLI PSICOPATICI GENOCIDI CONSIDERANO PSICOPATICI TERRORISTI TUTTI QUELLI CHE SI OPPONGONO A LORO

BREAKING Political Bombshell! Trump’s DOJ Declassifies Secret FBI Documents Proving Democrat Operatives Illegally Designated Conservative Media Outlets As Terrorist Organizations

Alex Jones: “We have to go after the Deep State for justice, but importantly, to stop them doing this more in the future against Americans!"

In the public interest, Jones is asking the Trump administration and congress to declassify all related documents and launch a public investigation.

BREAKING Political Bombshell! Trump’s DOJ Declassifies Secret FBI Documents Proving Democrat Operatives Illegally Designated Conservative Media Outlets As Terrorist OrganizationsImage Credit: Caspar Benson / Getty
SHARE
LIVE
gab

Watch & share this bombshell special report where Alex Jones covers newly released FBI documents showing the bureau – under the Obama administration – had classified Infowars with a Type 3 threat assessment, the highest national security threat level that falls just below warranting an official criminal investigation into potential homegrown violent extremist (HVE) groups:

MORE:

 

TH E PHILIPPINES ARE GOVERNED BY THE CIA, NOT BY THE BBMS AND ALSO NOT BY THE DUTERTES. MICROSOFT RULES THE SUPREME COURT.

 

USAID RH 2.0 Philippines- Service Delivery Senior Advisor- job post

3.7 out of 5 stars
Philippines

Location

Philippines

Full job description

Overview


RTI International’s Global Health Division is currently accepting applications for a Service Delivery Senior Advisor for an anticipated USAID-funded Family Planning and Adolescent Reproductive Health Activity (FP/ARH) in the Philippines. The project will launch at the end of calendar year 2024 and seek to improve health for underserved Filipinos. Through deep engagement with local actors and systems, the project will focus on the principles of sustainability and localization to achieve the following objectives:

Support adoption of positive social norms and behaviors.

Fortify responsiveness and quality of service delivery.

Bolster and institutionalize key health system functions in support of FP/ARH.


The Service Delivery Senior Advisor (SDSA)
 will design and lead activities to strengthen and expand the provision of quality, client-centered respectful family planning (FP)/reproductive health (ARH) care and services for men, women, and adolescents in underserved areas. S/he oversees the service delivery team, collaborate with the leadership team and is responsible for overall technical leadership and quality of FP/RH service delivery activities. The SDSA supports local government unit (LGU) self-reliance through planning and resource mobilization. Reports to the Deputy Chief of Party and is based in Manila.

Position is contingent upon award and funding.


Responsibilities


Essential Duties
:
  • Provide strategic leadership and oversight to strengthen and expand the provision of quality, client-centered respectful FP/RH for underserved population, including men, women and adolescents. Ensure program activities are evidence-based, adapted to local context and needs, and reflect state-of-the-art knowledge and best practices for FP/RH/ARH health service provision.
  • Lead technical coordination with key government counterparts such as but not limited to DOH, CPD and DepEd.
  • Oversee project technical contributions across clinical FP/RH/ARH interventions.
  • Lead design, promotion and adoption of high-impact practices through support to the key country stakeholders.
  • In coordination with the MERLA Director, support qualitative research design efforts to better understand supportive supervision mechanisms.
  • Lead and contribute to activities to design operational frameworks and guides for engaging private sector.
  • Build on frameworks to enhance policies, guidelines, and dissemination efforts with Project partners.
  • Lead project efforts to scale-up high-impact interventions and establish mechanisms to sustain practices.
  • Contribute to the preparation of annual work plans and program reporting and documentation of success stories.
  • May serve as a representative of the project to clients, stakeholders, and partners, providing key inputs for Service Delivery technical decisions.
  • Document and publish results and lessons learned.
  • Serve as member of Senior Management Team.
  • Directly supervise select staff at national level. Provide indirect management and technical direction to subnational staff.


Qualifications

Education & Experience
  • University degree (or higher) in clinical health field (nursing, medicine, surgery) and at least 12 years of progressive experience leading and implementing technical activities related to FP/RH and ARH service delivery and/or systems strengthening.
  • Demonstrated experience in service delivery in the Philippines, including provincial or regional hands-on service delivery and service delivery point management experience, quality improvement, FP/RH and ARH expertise.
  • Experience in convening and forging effective working relationships with health and non-health sector actors and private sector stakeholders to improve access to RH services, FP/RH and ARH preferred.
  • Additional experience in at least two of the following public health areas: implementation research, maternal health, nutrition, BCC, public policy and advocacy, gender mainstreaming, universal health care.

Knowledge, Skills & Abilities

  • Ability to oversee and provide guidance for Philippines quality of care policy and guideline development and workforce training.
  • Demonstrated success in facilitation, training, and TA for health systems leaders and providers.
  • Demonstrated ability to create and maintain effective working relations with senior government officials, NGO partners, donor agencies and community/facility partners.
  • Strong oral and written communication skills in English.


As a global employer of choice, RTI is committed to equity, diversity, inclusion and belonging in the workplace and the communities and markets where we serve our mission. We value diversity of thought, culture, background and perspective and welcome applicants without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, creed, citizenship status, disability, protected veteran status, or any other classification protected by applicable discrimination laws or RTI policy.

We are proud to be an equal opportunity employer. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability status, protected veteran status, or any other characteristic protected by law.

Click here. to view the EEOC Know Your Rights Poster.

Mosca, 22 civili massacrati dagli ucraini nel Kursk: ‘atti cannibaleschi’

 

Mosca, 22 civili massacrati dagli ucraini nel Kursk: ‘atti cannibaleschi’

22 civili massacrati dagli ucraini nel Kursk

MOSCA, 31 GEN – “Atti cannibaleschi contro cittadini pacifici”. Così la portavoce del ministero degli Esteri russo, Maria Zakharova, ha definito i crimini di cui sono accusati cinque militari ucraini, che secondo le autorità investigative di Mosca avrebbero ucciso 22 civili nella regione russa di Kursk, tra le quali 8 donne, che avrebbero anche violentato.

Secondo la portavoce, citata dall’agenzia Tass, questi “crimini disumani” dimostrano le radici “terroristiche e neonaziste del regime di Kiev” che gli occidentali “sponsorizzano con centinaia di miliardi di dollari ed euro”, ma che mostra la sua “impotenza militare e politica sullo sfondo delle sconfitte al fronte”.

“Nonostante tutta la sordità della comunità internazionale e la sua riluttanza a prestare attenzione a tali atrocità, dobbiamo continuare instancabilmente a fare appello alla loro coscienza e alla loro attenzione”, ha affermato da parte sua il portavoce del Cremlino, Dmitry Peskov. Il Comitato investigativo russo ha detto di avere accertato il coinvolgimento di almeno cinque militari delle truppe d’invasione ucraine nel Kursk nelle violenze e nelle uccisioni di civili, che sarebbero avvenute tra il settembre e il novembre del 2024 nel villaggio occupato di Russkoye Porechnoye. I corpi delle vittime sarebbero poi stati nascosti nelle cantine di alcune abitazioni rurali.

Le autorità russe hanno diffuso il video di uno dei militari accusati, identificato come Yevgeny Fabrisenko, che sarebbe stato arrestato durante le battaglie nel distretto di Sudzha. Il militare, afferma il Comitato investigativo, “ha ammesso la sua colpevolezza durante l’interrogatorio e ha testimoniato dettagliatamente come lui e altri militari ucraini hanno violentato, aggredito sessualmente e ucciso civili”. La portavoce del Comitato investigativo, Svetlana Petrenko, ha detto che i cinque militari sono accusati di “aver commesso un attacco terroristico, di stupro e violenza sessuale di gruppo“. (ANSA)

DOCUMENTI DEL DOJ USA DIMOSTRANO CHE ALEX JONES E INFOWARS.COM SONO STATI TRATTATI COME ORGANIZZAZIONI TERRORISTICHE DAI MASSIMI LIVELLI DEL GOVERNO OBAMA E BIDEN. LA CALDAIA STA SCOPPIANDO.

 


MERKEL E SCHOLZ HANNO PORTATO A NUOVI TRIONFI LE TRADIZIONI DI GOVERNO CRIMINALE DELLE CLASSI DIRIGENTI TEDESCHE: LA GESTIONE COVID, LA GUERRA CONTRO LA RUSSIA, LA DEINDUSTRIALIZZAZIONE E IL DEPOPOLAMENTO IN EUROPA VANNO SUL CONTO DEL GOVERNO FEDERALE TEDESCO, MOLTO PRIMA CHE SUL GOVERNO FRANCESE, QUELLO SVIZZERO E QUELLO INGLESE.

 World News

Establishment is Panicking as Germany’s Firewall Crumbles

Desperate calls to ban the AfD show how scared mainstream parties are of populists—and by extension their voters.

Establishment is Panicking as Germany’s Firewall CrumblesImage Credit: Thomas Lohnes / Stringer / Getty
SHARE
LIVE
gab

Less than three weeks before the general elections in Germany, calls to ban the right-populist AfD have reached a fever pitch. Last week, a proposal, supported by 123 MPs was brought to the Bundestag (German Parliament), demanding that a “Verbotsantrag”—an application for a party ban—be urgently pursued. Marco Wanderwitz, a CDU parliamentarian and one of the initiative’s leaders, defended the proposal saying: “They are enemies of the constitution… they are the enemies of democracy… the German state cannot tolerate the AfD without suffering long-term, irreparable damage to its very foundations.” 

The push to ban the AfD isn’t new. Interior Minister Nancy Faeser of the left-wing Social Democrats (SPD) floated the idea in 2023, with other leading government members supporting it. But now, the ban’s advocates find their influence waning. Faeser, one of Germany’s least popular politicians, faces dim prospects for another term, while her SPD party languishes at around 15% in the polls. Meanwhile, Wanderwitz—who lost his seat to the AfD in the 2021, but was still returned to the Bundestag via his party’s regional list—isn’t even seeking reelection. His urgent plea that the Bundestag “shouldn’t wait any longer” betrays a stark fear: once voters get to decide, the pro-ban faction will likely lose any chance of gaining the necessary majority.

The AfD’s seemingly unstoppable rise has shaken the German establishment to the core. Polls suggest the party could secure over 20% in the election. Yet the fear of populists—and by extension, their voters—has also been amplified by fractures within the establishment itself. 

The mainstream parties long maintained a united front against the AfD, operating under an iron-clad consensus: any AfD legislative proposals would be automatically rejected, while mainstream bills receiving AfD support would be withdrawn. This “firewall” strategy has now been breached by Friedrich Merz, the CDU opposition leader and chancellor candidate. In a move described as a ‘taboo-breaking gambit’, Merz last week pushed forward proposals for stricter migration measures despite AfD support. This marked a significant shift in Germany’s establishment, where the practice of cordoning off the AfD had been treated as sacrosanct.

His proposals included implementing permanent border controls, limiting family reunifications, and expanding detention for illegal immigrants. He advanced them in the wake of yet another deadly knife attack in the Bavarian city of Aschaffenburg, in which an illegal immigrant from Afghanistan killed a toddler and a 41-year-old man. Facing sharp criticism Merz responded: “Deciding what is right does not become wrong because the wrong people—i.e. the AfD—agree… How many more people need to be murdered?” He also rejected the ‘firewall’ terminology, stating: “The word firewall (…) is not used by me. Firewall is the wrong image. I don’t want the fire behind the wall to become a conflagration throughout Germany.” 

Merz’s initiative sparked immediate hysteria. On Saturday, thousands—including prominent politicians from the Greens, SPD, and Left Party—protested against Merz in several cities. In Leipzig, demonstrators chanted “We all hate the CDU.” The protests continued on Sunday when 160,000 people marched in Berlin under the slogan “Uprising of the decent—We are the firewall.” Former chancellor Angela Merkel has also entered the debate with sharp criticism of Merz, her successor as CDU leader. 

Yet calling for a firewall against—or the outright banning of—a party supported by a fifth of voters is profoundly anti-democratic. Proponents justify this using the distinctly German concept of “defensive democracy,” which advocates preemptively combating extremist movements. Under this doctrine, the Federal Constitutional Court can ban parties after a parliamentary majority vote. Only twice has this occurred since World War II: against a neo-Nazi party in 1952 and the Communist Party (KPD) in 1956. 

A party ban remains a complex, lengthy process, but the establishment’s anxiety already extends to future electoral cycles. Mainstream media outlets claim the AfD is orchestrating a path to power by 2029, with Stern writing: “As a chancellor candidate, Alice Weidel aims to lead the AfD to second place in the Bundestag elections. Then the final stretch to government will begin. Target year: 2029.” Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) meanwhile, pointed to Austria where the right-populist FPÖ recently won an election and is now set to form a coalition with the conservatives. He warned that “Germany is about to go the same way” and that Merz couldn’t be trusted.

While the election will show whether Merz’s initiatives have won back disaffected voters, one thing is clear: the advocates of firewalls and bans abandoned the pursuit of majorities long ago. Their only path to continued governance lies in marginalizing ever-larger segments of the electorate. For the CDU, the firewall strategy has proven catastrophic, forcing dependence on the SPD and Greens on crucial issues like migration. The tactic has also led voters to despair, with many doubting, as polls show, that much will change, even if the despised current government coalition loses power. Merz is right to reject the firewall; now it’s time to similarly reject the undemocratic calls for a party ban. 


WHY CONFISCATE & DISMEMBER THE BIG ONES? "The lesson here is that Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Google became too big, fat, and musclebound to remain sufficiently innovative. Instead of out-of-the-box invention, they specialized in marginal improvements." THEY ARE CLINGING ON THEIR PARASITARIAN DOMINANT POSITIONS AND THEY WANT TO BE FREE TO ABUSE OF THEM IMPUNELY.

 

US Capitalism just Got a Black Eye

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-AI, 3 Feb 2025

Robert Reich – TRANSCEND Media Service

27 Jan 2025 – The Story behind Today’s Stock Market Tank

I thought you’d like to know why the stock market tanked this morning.

Late last week, a little-known Chinese artificial intelligence start-up called DeepSeek revealed that it had come up with more advanced AI than America’s Big Tech companies, and at a tiny fraction of the cost — even without access to America’s advanced chip technology.

To add insult to injury, DeepSeek has made its technology “open source” — that is, available to everyone.

The lesson here is that Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Google became too big, fat, and musclebound to remain sufficiently innovative. Instead of out-of-the-box invention, they specialized in marginal improvements.

By contrast, Chinese tech corporations compete fiercely with each other. This has put them on the cutting edge — and is why China has been able to come up with startling innovations (not only in AI but in electric vehicles, batteries, even TikTok, and much more).

China’s secret sauce hasn’t been big subsidies from the Chinese government creating giant “national champions.” It’s been intense competition.

Lina Khan, Biden’s chair of the Federal Trade Commission — who sued Big Tech for monopolizing the market — correctly pointed out last March that the United States could not stay on the cutting edge by relying on giant “national champions.”

These days, the “national champions” argument often gets made in the context of our dominant tech firms. We often hear that pursuing antitrust cases against or regulating these firms will weaken American innovation and cede the global stage to China. These conversations often assume a Cold War-like arms race, with each country’s firms in a zero-sum quest for dominance…

History and experience show that lumbering monopolies mired in red tape and bureaucratic inertia cannot deliver the breakthrough technological advancements that hungry startups tend to create. It is precisely these breakthroughs that have allowed America to harness cutting-edge technologies and have made our economy the envy of the world. To stay ahead globally, we don’t need to protect our monopolies from innovation—we need to protect innovation from our monopolies. We need to choose competition over national champions.

So what happened to the stock market this morning?

Much of its recent valuation has been based on gigantic bets on artificial intelligence — in which big tech has been investing hundreds of billions of dollars in data centers and energy capacity it assumed it needed to get to the next generation of AI.

Wrong.

The US is going to have to rethink our entire approach to technology. We may also have to rethink our approach to capitalism.

_______________________________________________

Robert Reich is Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley and Senior Fellow at the Blum Center. He served as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time Magazine named him one of the 10 most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. He has written 17 other books, including the best sellers Aftershock, The Work of Nations, Beyond Outrage, Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few and The Common GoodHis new bookThe System: Who Rigged It, How We Fix Itis out now.  He is a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, founder of Inequality Media, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentaries Inequality for All, streaming on YouTube, and Saving Capitalism, now streaming on Netflix. robertreich.substack.com

Go to Original – robertreich.substack.com

THEY TRAIN YOU ALSO NOT TO THINK AT ALL AND NOT TO THINK HOW YOU WANT TO THINK, ESPECIALLY ABOUT THEM

 

They Don’t just Tell Us What to Think, They Train Us HOW to Think

IN FOCUS, 3 Feb 2025

Caitlin Johnstone - TRANSCEND Media Service

Image via Adobe Stock

And this, ultimately, is why the world looks the way it looks: because powerful people have been so successful at manipulating the way the public thinks about things.

31 Jan 2025 – It’s not just that they tell us what to think, it’s that they train us how to think.

From grade school on we are fed a framework for thinking about the world whose premises are completely fraudulent. Any analysis which does not take place within that framework is portrayed as ignorant at best and dangerous extremism at worst.

Before we come up with a single thought of our own about politics, we are trained to assume as our starting point that elections are real and that the official democratically elected government is the only power structure calling the shots in our country. We are trained to assume that decisions get made in our government based on how people vote in elections between two parties who oppose each other and promote the most organically popular positions on important issues in order to win votes. This is all complete bullshit, but it’s the foundation we’re taught to premise all our ideas and opinions about political matters upon.

Before we come up with a single thought of our own about government, we are trained to assume as our starting point that the people running things in our country are known to us and occupy official positions in our capitol. We are trained to assume that if we have a problem with the way things are going, there are official channels through which the powerful can be held to account and real changes can be advanced. The fact that we are actually ruled by unelected plutocrats and empire managers who often have no position in the official government is never seriously entertained.

Before we come up with a single thought of our own about the media, we are trained to assume as our starting point that we live in a free country with a free press instead of a dystopian civilization where the news media function as the propaganda services of our rulers. We are trained to assume that while some parts of the media may have obvious biases regarding which mainstream political faction they favor, it’s still possible to get a more or less accurate read on what’s happening in the world by listening to both sides of that ideological divide. None of this is true, but it’s the framework in which all mainstream analysis of the western media occurs.

Before we come up with a single thought of our own about foreign policy, we are trained to assume as our starting point that the US and its allies are more or less a force for good in this world, and that all the stories we hear about the governments and groups it works to destroy are more or less true. We are trained to assume that while the western power structure is imperfect and might make mistakes here and there, it must never stop killing and tyrannizing foreigners, because if it does, the bad guys might win. The easily quantifiable fact that the US-centralized empire is by far the most tyrannical and abusive power structure on earth never enters into the discussion.

This is the conceptual framework for thinking about the world that people are trained to espouse, first in school, and then throughout the rest of their lives by the mass media. If they go to university, as the most powerful people in our society typically do, then this framework is hammered home far more aggressively — especially in the most esteemed universities that the so-called “elite” tend to come from.

No thoughts which arise from outside this framework are taken seriously in mainstream politics, media, or academia. They might occasionally be entertained by friends over a bong or between chuckles on a podcast, but they are kept in the margins. This is reinforced by the way people learn that in order to ascend to influence and success they need to adhere to a specific way of thinking about things, thereby ensuring that all the most influential voices align with the authorized framework as well.

Ferocious disagreement is permitted, but before the debate even begins everyone involved needs to adhere to the founding assumptions of the official framework. After that you can argue as passionately as you like with the other side of this manufactured divide, because your ideas cannot pose any serious threat to your rulers.

And this, ultimately, is why the world looks the way it looks: because powerful people have been so successful at manipulating the way the public thinks about things. Our minds are inundated with propaganda telling us what to think, but more importantly they are shaped and programmed how to think about any new information they might come across.

Most of us are psychologically bent to the will of the powerful before we would ever even be in a position to begin thinking about opposing the status quo. We are herded like livestock away from thoughts of revolution and change, led by tightly controlled minds the way a bull is led by the ring on its nose.

Once you see how pervasive the conditioning is, you understand why getting real revolutionary movements going faces so much inertia. We won’t be able to free ourselves until we find a way to free our minds.

________________________________

 

Caitlin Johnstone is a rogue journalist, poet, and utopia prepperContact: admin@caitlinjohnstone.com

 

Go to Original – caitlinjohnstone.com.au

Lettera aperta al signor Luigi di Maio, deputato del Popolo Italiano

IL SOGNO DELLA RIVINCITA NEONAZISTA TARGATO CRIMINALI PANDEMICI E' SVANITO: SE NE DEVONO ANDARE TUTTI O ESSERE DEFENESTRATI.

  Ucraina, piano europeo per convincere Trump: 30mila soldati in campo Ultima ora 20 Febbraio 2025 09:05 REDAZIONE 1  ' di lettura (Adnk...