Visualizzazione post con etichetta esilio ai governanti. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta esilio ai governanti. Mostra tutti i post

BASTA PATERNALISMO ANTI-REFERENDARIO DA PARTE DELLA CORTE CASS! ANDATEVENE: ABBIAMO VISTO LA VOSTRA VERA FACCIA!!! FECCEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

 

Autonomia differenziata, Cassazione: Ok referendum per abrogazione

cassazione vaccini

È stata giudicata legittima la richiesta di abrogare l’Autonomia differenziata

Prima di indire il referendum sarà però necessario un altro passaggio davanti ai giudici della Consulta per la questione legata all’ammissibilità. Lo hanno stabilito i giudici dell’ufficio centrale del referendum che hanno in parte ribaltato quanto stabilito dalla Corte Costituzionale che aveva considerato legittima (giudicandone anticostituzionali solo alcune parti), la legge Calderoli, promulgata il 25 giugno scorso, e ha ritenuto non fondata la questione di costituzionalità dell’intera legge sull’Autonomia differenziata delle regioni ordinarie. tgcom24.mediaset.it

BASTA PATERNALISMO ANTI-REFERENDARIO DA PARTE DELLA CORTE COST! ANDATEVENE: ABBIAMO VISTO LA VOSTRA VERA FACCIA!!! FECCEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

 

Autonomia differenziata, Consulta: referendum inammissibile

Corte Costituzionale consulta

La Consulta ha dichiarato inammissibile il referendum abrogativo della legge sull’Autonomia differenziata delle Regioni

Ad emettere la sentenza sono stati gli attuali undici giudici della Corte Costituzionale.
La Corte ha rilevato che “l’oggetto e la finalità del quesito non risultano chiari”. La Consulta si era già espressa il mese scorso in merito alla cosiddetta ‘legge Calderoli’, sottolineando – ai fini di compatibilità costituzionali – la necessità di correzioni su sette profili della stessa legge: dai Livelli essenziali di prestazione (Lep) alle aliquote sui tributi. ANSA

MAI DIMENTICARE "IL" COVID

 

l Covid da dimenticare

Intervista al dr. Stramezzi di Pravdafreelance – L’Italia è stata costretta a sopportare la follia pandemica del Covid come altre nazioni del mondo e come tutti i Paesi di questo nostro Occidente collettivo in piena decadenza. Ma questa costrizione è stata ben tollerata da molti italiani. Abituati come sono ad una routine quotidiana poco impegnativa basata sul ciclo lavoro-cibo-svago-lavoro, non hanno manifestato alcuna difficoltà a credere ciecamente alla rappresentazione che veniva inscenata sotto i loro occhi.

Seguire i diktat anti-Covid, perfino i più assurdi, ha quindi avuto per loro il duplice scopo di esorcizzare la paura del contagio (quindi della morte) e facilitare il ritorno alla “normalità”. In fondo molti preti erano già scappati; molti politici piagnucolavano in televisione o si atteggiavano a uomini forti con risultati tristemente caricaturali; la medicina ufficiale procedeva lentamente, brancolava nel buio e sembrava che l’Apocalisse fosse dietro l’angolo.

È triste dirlo ma vengono alla mente le parole di Ernst Jünger su quanto sia facile per un animale da compagnia ritrovarsi preda: erano i giorni della Prima Guerra Mondiale, la battaglia della Somme era in pieno svolgimento e Jünger rifletteva su questa idea tra uno scontro sanguinoso e l’altro, avendo in mente gli uomini della sua generazione e una mollezza che vedeva iniziare a serpeggiare tra loro. Cosa penserebbe di noi ora, se fosse ancora vivo?

Non tutti i medici hanno però seguito pedissequamente gli ordini che arrivano dall’alto, i protocolli, le decisioni governative. Alcuni si sono rifiutati e hanno cercato una via alternativa, motivando il loro agire in base al loro senso del dovere nei confronti dei pazienti. Senza meraviglia alcuna, sono finiti all’indice, ostracizzati, sotto inchiesta. Il buon dottor Giuseppe De Donno, l’incredibilmente generoso dottor Giuseppe De Donno a cui noi tutti dobbiamo molto, è morto, ufficialmente suicida, malgrado avesse fatto pienamente il proprio dovere di medico.

Adesso che il Covid sembra essere acqua passata e addirittura c’è una commissione parlamentare d’inchiesta sulla gestione passata della pandemia, promessa elettorale di Giorgia Meloni, ho voluto porre qualche nuova domanda al dottor Stramezzi, anche lui finito a suo tempo nell’occhio del ciclone come “medico ribelle”. Ne è risultata una nuova, lunga intervista in cui il dottor Stramezzi esprime il suo punto di vista.

CONTINUA L'ARLECCHINATA DEL POTERE GIUDIZIARIO SUL COVID - NO CHANGE, SPECIALMENTE QUANDO VORREBBERO FARVI CREDERE CHE EPPUR QUALCOSA SI MUOVE

 

Gestione Covid, imputazione coatta per Ranieri Guerra

Ranieri Guerra piano pandemico

“responsabili del mancato aggiornamento del Piano pandemico nazionale del 2006 e dell’omessa definizione dei piani di dettaglio”

Il gip di Roma Anna Maria Gavoni, nello stralcio delle indagini trasmesse dai pm di Bergamo e Brescia per competenza territoriale nella Capitale, relative al piano pandemico e alla gestione dell’emergenza Covid, ha disposto l’imputazione coatta per l’ex numero due dell’Organizzazione mondiale della sanità (Oms) Ranieri Guerra, per l’allora direttore generale della Prevenzione del ministero della Salute, Giuseppe Ruocco, e per due dirigenti del ministero della Salute, Maria Grazia Pompa e Francesco Maraglino. Lo riporta l’AdnKronos.

Nei loro confronti la procura di Roma aveva sollecitato l’archiviazione nell’autunno del 2023, ma il giudice delle indagini preliminari, con un’ordinanza di 62 pagine depositata oggi, ha disposto che il pm entro 10 giorni formuli l’imputazione per l’accusa di rifiuto d’atti d’ufficio “in quanto indicati come responsabili del mancato aggiornamento del Piano pandemico nazionale del 2006 e dell’omessa definizione dei piani di dettaglio”. Ranieri Guerra era stato direttore generale del ministero della Salute.

Archiviata invece la posizione dell’ex presidente dell’Istituto italiano di sanità, Silvio Brusaferro, sia per l’ipotesi di truffa in riferimento a erogazioni pubbliche sia per il rifiuto di atti d’ufficio. Per quest’ultima ipotesi sono state archiviate anche le posizioni dell’ex capo della Protezione civile, Angelo Borrelli, e dell’allora dirigente del ministero della Salute Claudio D’Amario. Archiviata anche l’accusa di falsità ideologica commessa dal pubblico ufficiale in atti pubblici per lo stesso D’Amario e per gli altri dirigenti Francesco Maraglino, Loredana Vellucci, Mauro Dionisio.

“Una decisione in palese contrasto con l’approfondita indagine e la valutazione della procura che aveva richiesto l’archiviazione e che appare basata su una prospettiva di esplorazione dibattimentale ipotetica, tra l’altro per il professor Guerra che aveva cessato le sue funzioni nel 2017”. Così l’avvocato Roberto De Vita, difensore dell’ex numero due dell’Organizzazione mondiale della sanità Ranieri Guerra, commenta all’Adnkronos la decisione del gip di Roma.
www.quotidianosanita.it

DEAR MR. TRUMP: DO NOT FORGET TO TEAR DOWN THE PHILIPPINES SUPREME COURT EN BANC. THESE "JUDGEMENTS" ARE NOT ALLOWED TO STAND. THE PHILIPPINES PEOPLE HAVE BEEN DECEIVED BOTH BY DUTERTE AND BY BBM, BUT MOST OF ALL BY THE JUDICIARY VACCINOCRACY OF THE PHILIPPINES, WHICH IS JUST THE CONTINUATION OF ITS AUTOCRATIC TRADITION. LORD: FREE THIS COUNTRY FROM ITS PARASITES!


 



July 13, 2023

The Supreme Court En Banc, during its session on Tuesday, July 11, 2023, dismissed the petitions challenging the constitutionality of the numerous regulations issued by the Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases in the Philippines (IATF) in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as those issued by local government units and government agencies.

In its Resolution in the cases of G.R. No. 258619 (Montemayor, Jr. v. Inter-Agency Task Force on COVID and Emerging Infectious Diseases [IATF], et al.), G.R. No. 258746 (Passengers and Riders Organization [Pasahero], Inc., et al. v. Duque III, et al.) and G.R. No. 260327 (Perlas III, et al. v. The Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases [IATF], et al.), the Court unanimously voted to dismiss the consolidated petitions for violation of the doctrine of hierarchy of courts.

The petitioners assailed the validity of several issuances by the IATF in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as those issued by local government units and government agencies, specifically: IATF Resolution No. 148-B, 148-G, 149, 150, 155, 163, and 164; IATF Guidelines on Nationwide Implementation of Alert Level System for COVID-19 Response dated February 27, 2022; MMDA Resolution No. 22-01; DOTr D.O. No. 2022-001; DILG Memorandum Circular Nos. 2022-002 and 2022-008; LTFRB Memorandum Circular No. 2022-001; DepEd-DOH Joint Memorandum Circular No. 001, Series of 2022; DOH Department Circular No. 2022-0131; and Makati City Ordinance No. 2022-005.

IATF Resolution No. 148-B, requires all public and private establishments to require its eligible employees who are tasked to do on-site work to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or else subject themselves to RT-PCR testing every two weeks at their own expense, among others.

The petitioners collectively contended that the foregoing issuances trampled on their right to life and liberty without due process of law, constituted an impairment of their right to travel, as well as an infringement of the equal protection clause for applying only to those without access to private vehicles, and is discriminatory against the unvaccinated. They averred that the impugned measures embody a mandatory vaccination policy considering that the use of public transportation is an essential part of Filipino life.

The Court held that petitions were dismissible for violating the doctrine of hierarchy of courts as the resolution of the issues raised therein required the determination and adjudication of extremely technical and scientific facts that necessitates the conduct of a full-blown proceeding before a court of first instance.

The Supreme Court Public Information Office will upload a copy of the Resolution once it receives a copy from the Office of the Clerk of Court En Banc(Courtesy of the Supreme Court Public Information Office)

LA CORTE COSTITUZIONALE ED IL CONSIGLIO DI STATO SI DEVONO DIMETTERE IN BLOCCO. POI TOCCA A TUTTA LA PATTUMIERA DEI VACCINOCRATI ITALIOTI! LIBERIAMO L''ITALIA DA TUTTI I SUOI PARASSITI!

 


La madre dello sfigato e' sempre incinta. Il cameriere che non si vergogna mai di fare il servo.

 

UE: “confermare Di Maio come inviato nel Golfo”

Luigi Di Maio

L’Alto rappresentante dell’Unione europea per gli Affari esteri, Kaja Kallas, in una lettera inviata ai 27 Paesi membri, ha proposto la proroga fino al 28 febbraio 2027 del mandato di Luigi Di Maio come inviato speciale per l’Ue nel Golfo Persico. L’ex ministro degli Esteri italiano è in carica dal giugno 2023.

“L’eccellente performance del Rappresentante Speciale Luigi Di Maio, ha contribuito notevolmente a far progredire la cooperazione tra l’Ue e il Consiglio di Cooperazione del Golfo e ha svolto un ruolo chiave nello sviluppo della cooperazione regionale e bilaterale con i Paesi del Golfo nel campo delle consultazioni politiche, dialogo sulla sicurezza, commercio e investimenti, energia verde e relazioni interpersonali”, si legge nella missiva riportata da Il Foglio. tgcom24.mediaset.it

AstraZeneca

 Thank you AstraZeneca for the cardiac ischemia and for the kidney failure due to the excess spike protein. But I survived also this time, I am still here.

No dear friends: NO MEDICATIONS THIS TIME.

Weapons.

Fight Fight Fight

TUTTO LO STATO ITALIANO DEVE ESSERE LICENZIATO

 TUTTO LO STATO ITALIANO DEVE ESSERE LICENZIATO

OBNUBILATI DAL LORO FALLIMENTO SU TUTTA LA LINEA: PERCHE' CONTINUIAMO A METTERE IDIOTI AL COMANDO???

 

UE, Kallas: “nostra priorità è la vittoria dell’Ucraina”

Estonia Kaja Kallas

BRUXELLES, 12 NOV – “La vittoria dell’Ucraina è una priorità per tutti noi. La situazione sul campo di battaglia è molto difficile ed è per questo che dobbiamo continuare a lavorare ogni giorno, oggi, domani e per tutto il tempo necessario, con tutti i finanziamenti militari e gli aiuti umanitari necessari”.

Lo ha detto Kaja Kallas, candidata designata ad assumere la carica di Alto Rappresentante Ue, durante l’audizione di conferma alla Commissione Esteri del Parlamento europeo. “Tutto ciò – ha aggiunto – deve essere sostenuto da un percorso chiaro per l’adesione dell’Ucraina all’Ue: si tratta di sicurezza europea e di principi europei”. (ANSA)

DIE KLUGSCHEISSER HABEN DEN VON IHNEN ANGEZETTELTEN KRIEG VERLOREN: KLUGSCHEISSER MUESSEN ARBEITEN GEHEN, FALLS SIE DAZU FAEHIG SIND. AUF JEDEN FALL WEG VON JEGLICHER POLITISCHEN MACHT.

DIE KLUGSCHEISSER HABEN DEN VON IHNEN ANGEZETTELTEN KRIEG VERLOREN: KLUGSCHEISSER MUESSEN ARBEITEN GEHEN, FALLS SIE DAZU FAEHIG SIND. AUF JEDEN FALL WEG VON JEGLICHER POLITISCHEN MACHT.

I POLITICASTRI TEDESCHI CREDONO DI POTER SCAPPARE DALLE LORO RESPONSABILITA' PSICOPANDEMICHE CON LA GUERRA CONTRO LA RUSSIA - E ANDRANNO A FINIRE DI FRONTE A TRIBUNALI RUSSI PER VIOLAZIONI DEI DIRITTI UMANI . IHR WERDET ALLES ALLE BEZAHLEN. DIESMAL KEIN PERSIL.

 

EU politicians asking for war on their soil – Medvedev

The former Russian president has lashed out at German politician Friedrich Merz for saying he would threaten Moscow if elected chancellor 
EU politicians asking for war on their soil – Medvedev

Certain politicians in the European Union appear to be intent on triggering a full-blown war with Russia on their territory, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev claimed on Tuesday. 

The comments came after German lawmaker Friedrich Merz – leader of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and a contender to become the next chancellor – said he would back an ultimatum to Russia in which Ukraine would threaten to use long-range Western-supplied missiles unless Moscow agreed to a ceasefire. 

The German politician previously accused current Chancellor Olaf Scholz of being too dovish on Russia, criticizing the embattled leader for refusing to supply air-launched Taurus missiles to Kiev. 

Scholz has argued that such a move would make Germany a direct participant in the Ukraine conflict. In contrast, Merz has said that if elected chancellor, he intends to use the Kiev-requested weaponry as leverage with Moscow. He would deliver missiles within a week if Russia rejected Ukrainian demands, he told the Stern magazine in an interview last week.

Responding on Tuesday, Medvedev argued that the missiles would not change the course of the conflict, but instead would “increase by several times the risk of the conflict entering the most dangerous phase.” 

“Generally speaking, it is surprising how eager the current generation of European politicians are in inviting war to their territory. Notably, to the obvious delight of the Americans and against the wishes of their own peoples,” added Medvedev, who currently serves as deputy chair of the Russian Security Council. 

Inflated egos have replaced the wisdom and experience that European politicians used to show, he claimed.  

Moscow considers the Ukraine conflict to be a US-led proxy war against Russia, which the West intends to wage “to the last Ukrainian.” Kiev has long sought permission to deliver strikes with donated long-range weapons deep inside Russia. Russian President Vladimir Putin has said that his government will treat any such operation as a direct attack by the supplier of the arms involved. 

Earlier this month, the German ruling coalition collapsed amid disagreements between member parties on future government spending. Scholz has called for a parliamentary vote of confidence in January. Depending on the outcome, he would either lead a minority government or call a snap general election.

ANCHE L'ITALIA VOTA CONTRO LA RISOLUZIONE ONU PROPOSTA DALLA RUSSIA DI CONDANNA DI QUALSIASI FORMA DI (NEO)NAZISMO

 

Western states oppose UN motion condemning Nazism

The US, Canada, Germany and Ukraine have voted against the Russia-initiated resolution
Western states oppose UN motion condemning Nazism

A total of 54 countries, mostly Western states, have rejected a Russia-initiated resolution condemning Nazism in a vote at the UN on Monday.

The US, Canada, Germany, France, Australia, Austria, Greece, Italy, Poland, Finland, the Czech Republic and Ukraine were among the nations that rejected the motion.

However, their opposition did not prevent the Third Committee of the General Assembly from accepting the resolution, titled “Combating the Glorification of Nazism, Neo-Nazism, and Other Practices That Contribute to Fueling Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance.”

The document was supported by 116 countries, including Azerbaijan, Algeria, Armenia, Belarus, Bolivia, Brazil, China, Cuba, Serbia and Syria. Another 11 UN members abstained.

The victory over Nazism, achieved in the Second World War between 1939 and 1945, “cannot be revised,”Grigory Lukyantsev, the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s Department for Multilateral Cooperation on Human Rights, said before the vote.

"The adoption of this resolution is our duty before those who gave their lives for the sake of peace on Earth, for the triumph of humanity and humanism. Any other stance would be nothing but cynicism and heresy towards those who liberated the world from the horrors of National Socialism,” Lukyantsev insisted.

Russia has put forward the resolution annually since 2005. Last year, it was backed by 112 states, with 50 voting against, and 14 others abstaining.

The co-authors of its current draft included Algeria, Venezuela, China, North Korea, Pakistan, Cuba, South Africa and dozens of other countries.

The 74-paragraph document rejects the glorification and propaganda of Nazism, welcomes efforts to preserve historical truth, calls for measures against the denial of crimes against humanity and to prevent the rewriting of history when it comes to the Second World War.

The resolution also “strongly condemns the use in educational settings of educational material and rhetoric that promulgate racism, discrimination, hatred and violence on the basis of ethnic origin, nationality, religion or belief.”

Health board serving Canyon County votes to stop offering COVID-19 vaccine at its clinics Read more at: https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/community/canyon-county/article294433864.html#storylink=cpy

Health board serving Canyon County votes to stop offering COVID-19 vaccine at its clinics BY ANGELA PALERMO UPDATED OCTOBER 24, 2024 3:58 PM| 14 THE CDC recommends anyone 6 months and older get the new COVID vaccine to fight the virus. It's a different formula, a doctor explains. BY DAVID CARACCIO AND CLEVELAND CLINIC Southwest District Health will no longer offer the COVID-19 vaccine to residents who want to pay for it. The health district’s board members voted 4-3 to stop administering the vaccine at its clinics after a handful of anti-vaccine doctors, among them Dr. Ryan Cole, who sits on the Central District Health board, gave presentations at a lengthy meeting Tuesday night. Before the meeting, the board received hundreds of public comments asking the health district to remove the vaccine from its programs. Dr. Perry Jansen, the health district’s medical director, gave the only presentation in favor of continuing to offer the COVID-19 vaccine. The health district serves more than 300,000 people in Canyon, Adams, Gem, Owyhee, Payette and Washington counties. “I think the main thing we want to emphasize is that we do believe in a patient’s freedom of choice for their care,” Jansen said. “We’re not talking about mandates for vaccines or anything but the ability for patients to make decisions in coordination with their doctor for their own health.” Dr. John Tribble, the lone physician on the board, said the vaccine “presents much more risk than benefit,” and that recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to get it are “patently absurd.” The CDC recommends people age 6 months and older get the updated COVID-19 vaccine that was released this fall. “Given waning immunity of the population from previous exposure to the virus and from prior vaccination, we strongly encourage those who are eligible to consider receiving an updated COVID-19 vaccine to provide better protection against currently circulating variants,” Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, previously said in a statement. Jansen awknowledged various rare but adverse effects associated with the vaccine in his presentation and indicated that the benefits outweigh the potential risks. For example, he noted that some cases of myocarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle, have been observed in young men who received an mRNA vaccine (Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech), particularly after the second dose. The CDC says that such cases are rare and that most patients saw their symptoms resolve by the time of hospital discharge. “In this group, age 18-29, the risk of death from COVID is very small but is higher, quite a bit higher than the risk of even getting myocarditis,” Jansen said. “So you have to balance those risks.” He said that while there are fewer hospitalizations and deaths related to the virus now than they were a few years ago, it’s still circulating, and “people are still dying from COVID.” Boise saw a spike in the level of COVID-19 in its wastewater in early September, according to the city’s dashboard. The state and its health districts no longer keep track of the number of positive cases, so wastewater testing has become a useful tool to track local spread. Tribble argued at the meeting that it wasn’t an issue of personal freedom, because the health district isn’t the sole provider of the COVID-19 vaccine. “You can get this for free at Walmart,” Tribble said, though he didn’t mention that it’s free at those stores only with insurance. “If we continue to offer this, we are giving a tacit endorsement of these shots when we should not be. We are here to protect the public.” Jansen noted that the vaccine is no longer free. Most health insurances cover it, but the updated shots cost about $200 out of pocket, he said. The health district is able to buy doses of the vaccine at a discount and offer it to uninsured residents for less. A federal program previously covered the cost for uninsured or underinsured people. David Wiseman, a bioscientist who said he led a research and development program at Johnson & Johnson, joined the meeting remotely via teleconference and told the board that he agreed with Jansen that patients should have the freedom to choose whether they want to get the vaccine. His issue, he said, was whether the shots should be funded by the health district. Jansen spoke up again to clarify that the vaccines are not subsidized by the health district. The patients pay for the shots themselves, and most come in and ask for it, he said. “We’re not using taxpayer money to buy vaccines to give to people,” Jansen said. He reminded the board that there’s a consensus in scientific and medical communities that the COVID-19 vaccine is broadly safe and effective. He also told the board that “honestly, you’re not qualified” to determine whether the vaccine is safe or not. Still, the board ultimately decided to stop offering it after hearing conspiracy-laden presentations from multiple doctors accused of spreading misinformation about COVID-19, including: Cole, a controversial Garden City pathologist who has made unfounded claims about vaccine dangers such as that mRNA vaccines cause cancer, and who, as a result, was restricted from practicing most medicine in Washington state. Dr. Peter McCullough, a Texas cardiologist who promoted ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Dr. James Thorp, an OB-GYN who wrote a book claiming the vaccine killed or injured hundreds of millions of people. Dr. Renata Moon, a pediatrician who relinquished her Washington state medical license after arguing that children didn’t need the vaccine. McCullough alleged in his presentation that the vaccines were giving people COVID-19. “Doctors like myself are seeing patients, now patient after patient, who have taken a COVID vaccine, and because the vaccines don’t work they get COVID as well,” McCullough said. Nearly three hours into the meeting, Kelly Aberasturi, the board chair and trustee, asked the presenters to “get it wrapped up as soon as possible,” saying that the same presentation had been delivered to the board a couple of years ago. After the presentations, Jennifer Riebe, a commissioner for Payette County, spoke in favor of continuing to offer the vaccine at the health district’s clinics. “I just want to remind us there are a lot of taxpayers in our district that would like to come here and take that vaccine,” Riebe said. “You’re speaking, I think, for the taxpayers that don’t want the vaccine. We have a broader constituency than that.” Riebe expressed concerns that the board would go after other vaccines next, such as the measles, polio or shingles vaccines. The health district offers over a dozen vaccines for diseases that it says can cause hospitalization or even death, especially in infants, young children and older adults. “I’m not comfortable with that,” she said. The board members who voted in favor of no longer administering the vaccine at health district offices include Tribble, the physician representative; Viki Purdy, executive council representative from Adams County; Zach Brooks, commissioner from Canyon County; and Bill Butticci, commissioner from Gem County. Those who voted against were Riebe, the commissioner from Payette County; Aberasturi, the board chair and the commissioner from Owyhee County; and Lyndon Haines, the board vice-chair from Washington County. By law, Idaho’s district boards of health must have a representative from each county in the district and a physician, if one is available to serve. The COVID-19 vaccine is still available at pharmacies and health care clinics elsewhere in the counties the health district covers. READ NEXT BOISE & GARDEN CITY Vaccine-skeptic doctor on Boise-area health board let his medical license lapse. Now this SEPTEMBER 04, 2024 5:04 PM


Read more at: https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/community/canyon-county/article294433864.html#storylink=cpy 

Idaho health agency halts COVID vaccine program, joining backlash

 

Idaho health agency halts COVID vaccine program, joining backlash

A health department in Idaho has voted to halt its COVID-19 vaccination program, joining the growing number of regional governments pushing back against federal vaccination recommendations.

These actions concern some public health experts who fear health departments elsewhere in the country may stop offering vaccines and other vital health services.

Board members at Southwest District Health, outside of Boise, questioned the vaccine’s safety during their Oct. 22 meeting and narrowly voted to stop providing the shot in the six counties they serve.

Health departments in Texas, Florida and Michigan that led vaccination campaigns in their communities at the height of the pandemic have also pushed back against the COVID-19 vaccine.

Last year, Texas policymakers banned health departments and other organizations funded by the state government from using funds to promote their vaccination efforts.

The Florida Department of Health issued guidance in September warning Floridians not to get mRNA COVID-19 shots after Joseph Ladapo, the state's surgeon general, recommended people avoid them in 2023.  

How long does COVID last?Here’s when experts say you'll start to feel better.

In Michigan, commissioners in Ottawa County turned down a $900,000 grant for their health department in September. Joe Moss, chair of the commission, said at the time he was “opposed to accepting any COVID grants,” according to the The Holland Sentinel. The revised budget came a year after threats to slash funding sparked local protests.

In Idaho last month, some residents applauded the decision by the Southwest District Board to ban COVID-19 shots. Judy Call, 74, who submitted an email for the public comments portion of the meeting, said the board members made the "right call."

“I am grateful that this particular health district had the courage to stand up against the enormous pressure to ‘fall in line,'” said Call, who lives in Twin Falls, Idaho, about two hours from Boise, outside the region affected by the decision.

However, legal and public health experts fear the board’s decision may prompt other health departments to halt their vaccine programs and other services.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention still reports nearly 300 weekly deaths nationwide related to COVID-19. 

People who don’t have access to affordable health care – including people who are unhoused or live in long-term care facilities – will likely be most affected, said Karl Minges, associate dean for research at the University of New Haven’s School of Health Sciences in Connecticut.

“It’s a local health department abandoning its duty,” he said. “Their job is to uphold public health and respond to public health crises and they’re abandoning … those that have limited opportunities to get the vaccine from a local pharmacy or hospital.”

Lettera aperta al signor Luigi di Maio, deputato del Popolo Italiano

ZZZ, 04.07.2020 C.A. deputato Luigi di Maio sia nella sua funzione di deputato sia nella sua funzione di ministro degli esteri ...