NON BASTA ESPUNGERE SINGOLE LEGGI DAL CORPUS: BISOGNA ABROGARE CA. IL 99,99% DELLA PRODUZIONE LEGISLATIVA DAL 1980 AD OGGI - E' TUTTA INQUINATA NON SOLO DI LEGGI AD PERSONAM, LEGGINE E LEGGIUCOLE, MA DI TOTALITARISMO STRISCIANTE. SOLO L'ASSEMBLEA PERMANENTE DEL POPOLO ITALIANO PUO' INTRAPRENDERE QUESTA IMPRESA. E' ASSAI PIU' IMPORTANTE DELLA "RIFORMA" DELLA GIUSTIZIA. BASTA GUARDARE LE LEGGI CARTABIA PER RENDERSI CONTO CHE CI VOGLIONO METTERE NELLA LORO GABBIA SENZA USCITA, CHE HANNO COSTRUITO IN MODO STRISCIANTE IN PARALLELO ALLA TOTALITARIANIZZAZIONE DEL SISTEMA ECONOMICO. IN PRINCIPIO ERA IL TOTALITARISMO ECONOMICO: IL TOTALITARISMO DI FATTO. AD ESSO FACEVANO SEGUIRE QUELLO LEGISLATIVO. NON VOTATE AI REFERENDUM DI GIUGNO: SONO DEL TUTTO FUNZIONALI AL PROSIEGUO DEL PIANO TOTALITARIO ECONOMICO E LEGISLATIVO. L'OBIETTIVO E' L'ISTITUZIONE DELL'ASSEMBLEA COSTITUENTE PERMANENTE DEL POPOLO ITALIANO: SOLO ESSA PUO' LIBERARE L'ITALIA DA QUESTE PETECCHIE PARASSITARIE TOTALITARIE PER SEMPRE. MAI DIMENTICARE: LA MAGGIOR PARTE DEI PARASSITI UCCIDE IL LORO OSPITE. E' LA LORO "NATURA".

 

NEW BILL

Luna Introduces Bill to Repeal Patriot Act, Restore Privacy

US Representative Anna Paulina Luna has introduced a bill, the American Privacy Restoration Act, that aims to repeal the Patriot Act, passed in 2001. The Florida Republican believes that what has in the meantime become the notorious post-9/11 legislation, has been abused by "rogue" intelligence officers to carry out mass surveillance in unlawful ways. Announcing the bill, Luna mentioned that the Patriot Act has over the last decades been used to interfere in elections, violate innocent Americans' privacy by spying on them, and even "settle personal scores." We obtained a copy of the bill for you here. According to the representative, the ability to misuse and abuse the Patriot Act in such a way turned it into a tool for what is known as "the deep state" - whereas her legislative proposal seeks to take away the ability of these permanent power centers to violate the Fourth Amendment, that should protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. More: 20 Years Later: The Legacy of The Patriot Act and the war on privacy Like a number of other laws, in particular those supposed to regulate intelligence and broader national security work, on paper, the Patriot Act's condensed purpose is uncontroversial: to expand law enforcement powers, so as to "enhance the federal government's efforts to detect and deter acts of terrorism in the United States or against United States' interests abroad." However, on closer inspection - even before the law's subsequent slide into controversy - it quickly became clear that the expanded powers were too broad and went beyond surveillance itself, to allow for warrantless searches in some cases, more "information sharing," as well as access to business records. Critics have been saying that since 2001, the Patriot Act has been turned against Americans themselves, and used as an excuse to subject even those not suspected of any wrongdoing to mass surveillance, all the while sidestepping the necessary guardrails and oversight. Luna believes this has produced "the most sophisticated, unaccountable surveillance apparatus in the Western world." And she believes it is necessary to act now to rectify this situation. "It's past time to reign in our intelligence agencies and restore the right to privacy. Anyone trying to convince you otherwise is using 'security' as an excuse to erode your freedom," the legislator is quoted as saying. One of Luna's unlikely - for political and ideological reasons - allies is the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which has been pushing for reforms of the Act, reminding of the fact that when it was first passed in October 2001, many members of Congress admitted to not having read the bill before voting for it. According to the ACLU, there were "intimations from the Bush administration that those who voted 'no' would be held responsible for further (terror) attacks."