Cerca nel blog

06/08/22

Philippine Daily Inquirer publishes CCH open letter on forced vaccinations

 

Philippine Daily Inquirer publishes CCH open letter on forced vaccinations

The image below is a copy of a one-page full ad published by the Philippine Daily Inquirer (Inquirer) today, December 1, 2021.

Inquirer is one of the largest newspapers in the Philippines. It has a reach of about 300,000 daily readers.

Download Image Here

10 thoughts on “Philippine Daily Inquirer publishes CCH open letter on forced vaccinations

  1. Sir, just a few minutes ago somebody uses my fb acct posting a comment about WHO messages. That is not me coz i am not in favor of vaccination and never ever be that i wud allow myself to be vaccinated. I am now troubled for somebody is having access to my acct.

    1. Hello Benjamin,

      HAve you tried changing your password? Change it now, and then log out all devices signed in to your FB account (there is a way to do this within FB). Also, search for various ways you can protect your privacy while on FB.

  2. This fake pandemic only ends with unified mass non-compliance with these nonsensical mandates that are not based on science.
    A fake vaccine containing all kinds of toxic shite, not least the ones that edit your DNA to turn the human body into a virus-factory.
    Disables your immune system which is your first line of defense when it comes to personal health.
    Masks and face shields that DO NOT filter anything!
    A fraudulent RT PCR test that does not test for a virus. They just increase the amplification or cycle threshold to such a high level that it magnifies your genetic material as the virus. . If they want to manipulate public into believing that vaccines are working, they lower the CT. If they want to ramp up the fear, they simply dial up the CT. What they have is a perfect tool to manipulate humans into consenting to these fake vaccines.
    The government is destroying us. IATF resolution 148B mandating onsite workers to be vaccinated is highly discriminatory! Businesses and the private sector is being co-opted by the government (like all governments in the world are simply corporations masquerading as governments) to enforce vaccine passports. Enforcing these mandates means creating a two-tiered society discriminating against those who refused to be vaccinated with this fake vaccine. Now I know how black people felt in the 1950s and 1960s.
    And it is downright evil to put people in a situation where they had to choose between their life-long health and their livelihood. That IS A FALSE CHOICE!
    Now they’re talking about vaccinating kids! We can’t allow that to happen!

    1. Love your name, Non GMO Human!

      In essence, everything we are doing now in CCH is really geared towards protecting our children – their future, and their freedoms. Every single freedom we surrender now is a right that our children will never get to experience. Come to think of it, Big Pharma is forcing these vaccines on our healthy children because they want to secure their long-term business!

      Unfortunately, the people in government seem to have blinders. They cannot see beyond these vaccines. They do not see the data that the majority of those who get COVID actually recover. They do not see the deaths following vaccination, and the injuries the vaccines are causing. We can stop our government from coercing EVERYONE to get the vaccine. They cannot take away our God-given right to choose what we put/not put inside our bodies.

      We know that even the vaccinated understand what freedom of choice means! We know that many of them stand with us in this position. So let us not be dissuaded. Together, we will overcome!


Group readying suit vs ‘coercive, discriminatory’ vax policies in the Philippines

 

‘CALL TO HUMANITY’ OPPOSES MANDATORY COVID-19 INOCULATION

Group readying suit vs ‘coercive, discriminatory’ vax policies

Nicanor Perlas

Nicanor Perlas (Photo Courtesy of Covid Call to Humanity)

MANILA, Philippines — A group opposing mandatory vaccination is set to bring charges against the government for allegedly forcing Filipinos to get jabbed against COVID-19 and imposing policies discriminatory to those who refuse to do so.

In a phone interview on Wednesday, Nicanor Perlas, head of COVID-19 Call to Humanity (CCH), said a legal team was finalizing the “series of lawsuits we have been preparing for a month.” He did not disclose details but said the suits would be filed “as soon as possible.”

ADVERTISEMENT

He said victims of all forms of vaccine coercion, vaccine-injured persons, and those who lost a relative that had received at least one jab were among the plaintiffs.

The lawsuits are in response to the government’s inaction to the “cease and desist” document and notice of liability to stop “mindless lockdowns and forced mass vaccinations.”

FEATURED STORIES

DOH position

The 86-page dossier was submitted in October to the Office of the President and other government agencies, as well as hundreds of local government units (LGUs). According to Perlas, the Department of Health responded that it would maintain the status quo.

“The general response was it’s business as usual, and they basically ignored it, so we will be filing lawsuits after exhausting administrative remedies,” he said.

In response, the DOH on Wednesday said it was standing with the medical community in reiterating the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.

“All information about the vaccines has been made transparent and open to the public. Before being approved for emergency use, these vaccines have been properly tested to ensure hat the benefits of the vaccination far outweigh any risk,’’ Dr. Beverly Ho, concurrent director IV of the Health Promotion Bureau and the Disease Prevention and Control Bureau.

She said that from March to November, 93 percent of COVID-19 deaths in the Philippines were unvaccinated Filipinos.

Cabinet Secretary and acting presidential spokesperson Karlo Nograles said on Wednesday that the Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases ( IATF) had yet to decide on whether to impose mandatory vaccination.

“We will need a law on that,” Nograles, who is IATF cochair, told ANC. “We in the IATF, we continue to discuss it. We also don’t want to preempt Congress.”

ADVERTISEMENT

‘Dangerous’ 2019 provisions

But he cited Interior Secretary Eduardo Año’s opinion that LGUs could pass ordinances requiring mandatory vaccination.

Perlas and the CCH are mainly opposing the IATF’s Resolution No. 148-B which, among its “dangerous” provisions, compels employers to require all on-site workers to be fully vaccinated, strongly enjoins local governments to ramp up demand for vaccination, and prioritizes fully inoculated persons for services from both government and public and private establishments.

“What is happening is there is discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, which is unconstitutional,” said Perlas, a sustainable development advocate who made an unsuccessful run for the presidency in 2010.

It’s OK to be vaccinated, but the government should not coerce people “and create conditions that will force them to get vaccinated,” he said.

Per the CCH, the resolution contradicts Republic Act No. 11525 (or the Covid-19 Vaccination Program Act of 2021), which states that Covid-19 vaccination shall not be considered an additional mandatory requirement for educational, employment and other government-transaction purposes.

Perlas said the CCH had “more than 100,000” supporters composed of doctors, lawyers, researchers, workers from the private and public sectors, businesspersons and lay leaders.

He said that since the CCH’s inception, it had been receiving “almost 50 complaints” daily from Filipinos forced to get jabbed against Covid-19—from government employees to impoverished beneficiaries of government programs.

Informed choice

“Forced vaccination is rape of our body, soul and spirit,” Perlas said, quoting from the CCH statement.

“We insist on free and informed choice that is based on full disclosure of the adverse effects of Covid-19 vaccines, and our constitutionally protected human right to choose what kind of drugs and vaccines will be injected into our bodies,” he said.

Interior Secretary Año earlier said that in the absence of a law requiring COVID -19 vaccination, LGUs could, through Section 16 of the Local Government Code, issue executive orders and ordinances that will protect their constituents.

Perlas said such “executive orders and ordinances” would be challenged by CCH members in their respective localities.

But at the Palace public briefing, Health Undersecretary Myrna Cabotaje, head of the National Vaccination Operations Center, backed calls to make vaccination mandatory.

“Yes, that is the only way for everyone to get vaccinated. You know the directive of the President that no one should be left behind. So everybody should get vaccinated,” she said.

President Duterte on Monday said he might approve a recommendation for mandatory vaccination should the IATF make it.

He said he could invoke powers to implement measures to protect public health even in the absence of a law, adding that he would not sit idly while unvaccinated persons get sick with COVID-19 and infect others.

Restrictions

Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana is all for making COVID-19 jabs mandatory, and is proposing restrictions for the unvaccinated.

“Everyone should contribute to the health of the community, Lorenzana, who chairs the National Task Force Against COVID-19, said in a message to reporters.

He said the unvaccinated were “vulnerable [to] getting the virus and getting seriously sick,” and would “not only burden the state [with] their hospitalization but also spread the virus around.”

Lorenzana said unvaccinated persons could be barred from traveling or entering public places such as malls, restaurants or stadiums unless they produce a negative result of a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test taken within 72 hours.

Or, he said, unvaccinated workers could take weekly RT-PCR tests at their own expense so they could report for work.

—WITH REPORTS FROM JEANNETTE I. ANDRADE AND TINA G. SANTOS

For more news about the novel coronavirus click here.
What you need to know about Coronavirus.
For more information on COVID-19, call the DOH Hotline: (02) 86517800 local 1149/1150.

The Inquirer Foundation supports our healthcare frontliners and is still accepting cash donations to be deposited at Banco de Oro (BDO) current account #007960018860 or donate through PayMaya using this link.

Read Next

Dieser Mann gehoert ins Gefaengnis - zusammen mit seinen Herren

 

Gedenken an Atombombenabwurf auf Hiroshima: Spiel mit „geladener Waffe“

Vor 77 Jahren verwandelte eine Atombombe die japanische Stadt in ein Inferno. Angesichts von Russlands Angriffskrieg geht vom Gedenken ein dringender Appell aus.

Antonio Guterres vor dem Mahnmal für die Opfer des Atombombenabwurfs auf Hiroshima

UN-Generalsekretär Antonio Guterres in Hiroshima: „Nehmen Sie die nukleare Option vom Tisch – für immer. Es ist Zeit, Frieden zu verbreiten.“ Foto: Kenzaburo Fukuhara/dpa

HIROSHIMA dpa | Angesichts weltweit wachsender Sorgen über die Gefahr eines Atomkrieges hat die japanische Stadt Hiroshima der Opfer des Atombombenabwurfs vor 77 Jahren gedacht. „Krisen mit ernsten nuklearen Untertönen breiten sich schnell aus – vom Nahen Osten über die koreanische Halbinsel bis hin zur russischen Invasion in der Ukraine“, sagte UN-Generalsekretär António Guterres am Samstag bei einer Gedenkzeremonie im Friedenspark von Hiroshima. „Die Menschheit spielt mit einer geladenen Waffe“. Es sei „völlig inakzeptabel, dass Staaten, die Atomwaffen besitzen, die Möglichkeit eines Atomkriegs zugeben“, sagte Guterres und fügte hinzu: „Nehmen Sie die nukleare Option vom Tisch – für immer. Es ist Zeit, Frieden zu verbreiten.“

Es war das erste Mal seit zwölf Jahren, dass ein UN-Chef an Hiroshimas jährlichem Gedenken teilnahm. Russland und sein Verbündeter Belarus waren nicht dazu eingeladen. Um 8.15 Uhr, dem Zeitpunkt, als der US-Bomber Enola Gay am 6. August 1945 die erste im Krieg eingesetzte Atombombe mit dem Namen „Little Boy“ über Hiroshima abgeworfen hatte, legten die Teilnehmer eine Schweigeminute ein. „Wir müssen sofort alle nuklearen Knöpfe bedeutungslos machen“, sagte der Bürgermeister von Hiroshima, Kazumi Matsui. Er erwähnte in seiner Rede vor Vertretern von 99 Nationen sowie der Europäischen Union ausdrücklich Russlands Angriffskrieg gegen die Ukraine, dem unschuldige Zivilisten zum Opfer fielen.

Die atomare Abrüstung war schon vor Russlands Invasion ins Stocken geraten. Jetzt wird die Reduzierung der knapp 13. 000 Atomwaffen weltweit noch schwerer. „Wir müssen die Schrecken von Hiroshima jederzeit im Auge behalten und erkennen, dass es nur eine Lösung für die nukleare Bedrohung gibt: überhaupt keine Atomwaffen zu haben“, sagte Guterres, der für seine Rede in Hiroshima Applaus erhielt.

Russland hatte kürzlich bekräftigt, keinen Atomkrieg starten zu wollen. „Wir gehen davon aus, dass es in einem Atomkrieg keine Sieger geben kann und er niemals begonnen werden darf“, schrieb Präsident Wladimir Putin in einem Grußwort an die noch bis zum 26. August laufende Konferenz zum Atomwaffensperrvertrag in New York.

„Weltweit gewinnt die Vorstellung an Bedeutung, dass Frieden von nuklearer Abschreckung abhängt“, beklagte Hiroshimas Bürgermeister Matsui in seiner Gedenkrede. Japans Regierungschef Fumio Kishida sagte, sein Land werde daran arbeiten, die „Realität“ eines sich verschlechternden Sicherheitsumfelds mit dem „Ideal“ einer Welt ohne Atomwaffen zu verbinden. Kishida stammt selbst aus Hiroshima.

Japan richtet in der Millionen-Stadt im kommenden Jahr den Gipfel der sieben führenden demokratischen Wirtschaftsmächte (G7) aus. Zehntausende Bewohner waren an jenem 6. August 1945, als die USA die Atombombe abwarfen sofort ums Leben gekommen, insgesamt starben bis Ende 1945 schätzungsweise 140.000 Menschen. Drei Tage nach Hiroshima warfen die USA eine zweite Atombombe über Nagasaki ab. Kurz danach kapitulierte das japanische Kaiserreich. Heute sind die USA Japans Schutzmacht. Hiroshima wurde zu einem Symbol für Krieg – und Frieden.

Noch knapp 700 – dann sind wir 35.000. Machen Sie jetzt mit!

Unsere Community ermöglicht den freien Zugang für alle. Dies unterscheidet uns von anderen Nachrichtenseiten. Wir begreifen Journalismus nicht nur als Produkt, sondern auch als öffentliches Gut. Unsere Artikel sollen möglichst vielen Menschen zugutekommen. Mit unserer Berichterstattung versuchen wir das zu tun, was wir können: guten, engagierten Journalismus. Alle Schwerpunkte, Berichte und Hintergründe stellen wir dabei frei zur Verfügung, ohne Paywall. Gerade jetzt müssen Einordnungen und Informationen allen zugänglich sein.

Was uns noch unterscheidet: Unsere Leser:innen. Sie müssen nichts bezahlen, wissen aber, dass guter Journalismus nicht aus dem Nichts entsteht. Dafür sind wir sehr dankbar. Mittlerweile sind schon fast 34.300 Menschen dabei und ermöglichen damit den taz-Blick aufs Weltgeschehen, jeden Tag hier auf taz.de. Damit wir auch morgen noch unseren Journalismus machen können, brauchen wir mehr Unterstützung. Wir möchten die 35.000 erreichen - und mit Ihrer Beteiligung können wir es schaffen. Es wäre ein schönes Zeichen für die taz und für die Zukunft unseres Journalismus. Mit nur 5,- Euro sind Sie dabei!

US-Philippines Military Alliance Could be Detrimental to the Philippines in the Outbreak of Taiwan Conflict

 

US-Philippines Military Alliance Could be Detrimental to the Philippines in the Outbreak of Taiwan Conflict

Theme:

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on InstagramTwitter and Facebook. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

The provocative visit of US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan on August 2, 2022 has caused major uproar not just from China but even from other peace-loving states. Pelosi’s visit has breached America’s One-China Policy, which formally acknowledges only one Chinese government and maintains the position of Taiwan being a breakaway region of China. Even prior to Pelosi’s visit, recent developments surrounding Taiwan have already escalated tensions between the two major powers and further soured their diplomatic relations. The trip occurs against the backdrop of express military agreement between the US and Taiwan, thereby sending a wrong signal to mainland China.

By ignoring China’s strong objections to Pelosi’s Taiwan visit, the US egregiously imperils regional stability and peace, and endangers an imminent outbreak of war between Taiwan and mainland China.

What are its implications for the Philippines, a small state that is 719.4 miles south of Taiwan?

Map of the Philippines in relation to Taiwan and China (Source: The Diplomatic Envoy, Seton Hall University via The Maritime Review)

US-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty

The southeast asian state pursued a flawed ‘independent foreign policy’ at the helm of former president Rodrigo Duterte, who threatened to abrogate the US-Philippines Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA), a component of the US-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT). The VFA is a mutual military agreement that allows US troops, under the provisions of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), “access to designated Philippine military facilities, the right to construct facilities, and preposition equipment, aircraft, and vessels, but rules out permanent basing.” The maverick leader flirted with the idea of cooperating with the Russian Armed Forces and China’s People’s Liberation Army, but reverted his decision and withdrew the termination of the VFA. This move came amid the increasing tension in the South China Sea, where the Philippines is a claimant state. 

Incumbent president Ferdinand Marcos Jr. vowed to continue Duterte’s foreign policy trajectory, iterating the slogan, “a friend to all, an enemy to none”. But it seems just another hot air as the country’s plans for US forces are back on track, including the building of facilities for US troops at five military bases — one in Palawan whose proximity to the South China Sea makes it conducive to conducting surveillance flights. Further, the Philippine navy begins to station at the Subic Bay Naval Base, which sits facing the South China Sea, with a view to “countering China’s increasing assertiveness in the contested waters“. The port authority head intimated the welcomed presence of the US navy as a balancing force against the formidable Chinese counterpart.

The crux of the US-Philippines joint military exercises and cooperation agreements is clear and definite: to counter China through the South China Sea crisis. Disaster relief, counterterrorism, etc. are just the tip of the iceberg. What is hidden from the Filipino public is the hegemon’s motive of encircling the emerging superpower — under the guise of a routine military exercise and training aimed at enriching military capabilities towards “maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific region“.

The Philippines in the event of a Taiwan-China conflict

The Philippines engages in economic and trade relations with Taiwan but maintains diplomatic relations only with mainland China. Amid the rising tension in the Taiwan Strait, the Philippine government released a brief but straightforward message, claiming adherence to the One-China Policy and the importance of diplomacy and dialogue.

Analysts lambasted the press release as “tiptoeing” around a major economic partner by “refusing to give any more comments”. “Tiptoe” is a misnomer with the ongoing US-Philippines military exercises — aimed at countering China — in the background. Having US troops and military equipment in the Philippine soil, the southeast asian state will become heavily embroiled in the event of a war outbreak between Taiwan and China, given America’s expression of military support to Taipei.

The volatility of the security architecture in the Indo-Pacific region should prompt a more open and honest dialogue and military diplomacy among the concerned states. The Philippines should limit, if not repeal, the provisions of the Mutual Defense Treaty with the US if it is serious in its commitment to an independent foreign policy.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Jezile Torculas has a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science.

The Filipino Family In Danger | Timothy Laws

 

Timothy Laws is a member of the Board of Advisers for the Alliance for the Family Foundation Philippines, which offers advice to its Board of Trustees. Popularly known as ALFI, it works to influence leaders and decision-makers in Philippine society by providing them with accurate and complete scientific information and education so they can foster and defend the sacredness of marriage, promote family solidarity, and protect human life in all its stages.

Timothy grew up in a small town in Pennsylvania.  He studied engineering in college, and after college, became a partner in a small businesses.  But he wanted to do something to help make the world a better place. At the time, hunger and starvation were one of the greatest injustices in the world. He volunteered with an NGO that works to enlist the resources of the U.S. to alleviate hunger both at home and abroad.  After a few years, Timothy met his wife through that work  — she was also a volunteer from the Philippines, who had come to the U.S. to study.  They fell in love and married within a year, and lived in Pennsylvania and later California.  In 1996 they moved to the Philippines.  “We’re still here,” Timothy says, “and we continue to try to make the world a better place in our own small way.  That’s what attracted me to my wife – in addition to her winning smile – in the first place.”

Readings & Resources

Clarifications & Corrections

  • from Mr. Laws: “Apologies, during the interview I stated that Prof. Pritchett’s paper showed that only 5% of the reduction in fertility was due to contraceptives, but I’m reminded by the paper that the actual figure is 10%.”

Action Items

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

ECCO IL PRIMO DEL GOBIERNO DEI COLONNELLI

 

Repubblica, Salvini fa la lista dei ministri “Cingolani, Figliuolo, Bertolaso…”

Sakvini e Figliuolo

Cingolani, Figliuolo o Bertolaso, un ambasciatore: la lista dei ministri di Salvini. La Lega vedrebbe bene Roberto Cingolani, ministro uscente della Transizione ecologica, in un eventuale governo della destra. “Cingolani – ha detto a Lampedusa Matteo Salvini – ha tutta la mia stima: si e’ fatto carico piu di una volta di usare il termine nucleare facendo arrabbiare Pd e Cinque Stelle; cosi’ come non si puo’ piu’ rinviare il Ponte sullo Stretto, non si puo’ piu rimanere tra i pochi grandi paesi al mondo che non producono energia nucleare di ultima generazione. Non credo che Cingolani – ha aggiunto – abbia tessere di partito in tasca, non e’ della Lega, ma se fosse a disposizione sarei felice”.

Leggi anche
Cingolani: “il pianeta è progettato per 3 miliardi di persone”
Vaccino Covid, Figliuolo si oppone alla pubblicazione del contratto tra Italia e Pfizer
Vaccino Covid, Bertolaso: “ritirare il green pass a chi non fa la terza dose”

Nella lista dei ministri, anche Figliuolo e Bertolaso

Secondo Repubblica, invece, “per gli Esteri invece nomi non ne fa: «ce ne sono due o tre, ma non vi dico chi sono o gli rovinate il fine settimana». Per tutti però il profilo è il medesimo: ambasciatori o ex, «abituati a parlare con tutti e di esperienza comprovata»”.

Repubblica prosegue la lista: “Nella lista esplicita dei desiderata, c’è posto anche «un commissario all’immigrazione, come un Figliuolo in Italia o un Bertolaso in Lombardia. Un militare, un carabiniere, un marinaio, l’importante — sottolinea — è che la catena di comando sia unica». Di Viminale invece Salvini non parla, sebbene nessuno — neanche fra i suoi — dubiti che ambisca a tornarci”. (affaritaliani.it)