L’attacco
del docente contro Bianchi: “Dalle classi pollaio alle mascherine,
tante promesse mancate. Vergogna, signor ministro, vergogna”
9 June 2022
Il ministro dell’Istruzione, Patrizio Bianchi, si prende un paio di
“vergogna” e annessi applausi di approvazione dalla piazza della Cgil di
Bologna.
L’attuale ministro dell’Istruzione, così come segnala l’agenzia di
stampa Dire, è stato tirato in ballo in uno degli interventi
dell’iniziativa “Camminiamo insieme”, cioè l’assemblea pubblica
organizzata dalla Camera del lavoro in vista della mobilitazione
nazionale del 18 giugno, a cui ha partecipato anche il segretario
generale Maurizio Landini.
A parlare di scuola è Gaetano Passarelli, insegnante dell’istituto Belluzzi-Fioravanti e delegato della Flc. “Oggi che finalmente si comincia a vedere una luce in fondo al tunnel – afferma Passarelli – ci
troviamo con un ministro che a inizio anno scolastico sosteneva che
saremmo stati in classe senza mascherina ma a fine anno ci dice che le
mascherine a scuola sono educative”.
L’insegnante, poi, se la prende con il Governo per il decreto legge “con
cui fa carta straccia del nostro contratto di lavoro e dispone tagli
agli organici e al salario, per finanziare la competizione tra i
docenti”.
A seguire, tocca di nuovo a Bianchi: “Ha avuto l’impudenza, dopo
tre anni scolastici di pandemia, di affermare che ‘fare classi meno
numerose non ha senso, perché i bambini in classi troppo piccole non si
ritrovano’. Vergogna, signor ministro, vergogna“, urla il delegato facendo scattare un applauso della platea Cgil.
Malevolent forces: How hypocritical US says one thing and does the opposite on Taiwan question?
By Wen Xian Published: Jun 07, 2022 09:41 PM
A view of the Taiwan Straits, seen from Xiamen port, in East China's Fujian Province. Photo: IC
The
US has always said one thing and done the opposite on the Taiwan
question, and it has been actively engaged in a series of dirty tricks
to undermine the one-China principle recently.
When US President
Joe Biden announced the launch of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework
for Prosperity (IPEF) in Japan on May 23, the island of Taiwan was not
included in the economic initiative. On June 1, however, Washington
announced a new trade initiative with the island of Taiwan. On a recent
visit to Japan, Biden said the US would intervene militarily to "defend"
the island. However, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, in his
speech on China policy on May 26, stated that the US does not support
"Taiwan independence" and its one-China policy remains unchanged...
All
of this exposes the US' hypocritical policies toward Taiwan. The US has
been using the island of Taiwan as a "pawn" to implement its strategy
to contain China and prevent the reunification of the country.
Nearly
40 years ago, in July 1982, Chiang Ching-kuo, former Taiwan regional
leader and the eldest son of Kuomintang Chairman Chiang Kai-shek, wrote
in an article in memory of his father, "I sincerely hope that my
father's spirit can return home and be with our ancestors." He also said
that he would "expand the spirit of filial piety into national
sentiment, love the nation and devote myself to the country." On July
24,1982, Liao Chengzhi, Chiang's classmate in Moscow, wrote to Chiang,
pointing out that "the outsider" is a plausible liar who intends to take
the island of Taiwan, which is well known by the world. There will be
chaos if you do not end relations with her, said Liao, former vice
chairman of the Standing Committee of the 5th National People's
Congress.
This "outsider" Liao mentioned in his letter is the
US. Liao's cautionary advice unfortunately came to pass. On the Taiwan
question, the outsider is now making waves, and Taiwan authorities are
willing to be its puppet.
Foundation laid through tough negotiations
It
was this outsider who took advantage of the Korean War in the early
1950s to insert the US Navy Seventh Fleet into the Taiwan Straits like a
wedge, making the Chinese mainland and the island of Taiwan as far
apart as sea and sky after the end of the Chinese civil war. During the
Cold War era, the island of Taiwan gradually became part of the "island
chain" strategy of the US.
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, as
the international situation changed and China grew stronger, the US
began to adjust its policy toward China, and China-US relations
gradually gained momentum.
After a series of arduous
negotiations, China and the US signed three joint communiqués, which
laid the foundation for relations between the two countries and
clarified positions of the two sides on the Taiwan question.
Amid
major changes in the international landscape, the Taiwan question,
which is to do with national reunification or secession, is bound to
become China's core concern.
This year marks the 50th
anniversary of former US president Richard Nixon's visit to China and
the publication of the Shanghai. After a series of arduous
negotiations, China and US issued the Shanghai Communiqué, which stated
that the Chinese government firmly opposes any activities which aim at
the creation of "one China, one Taiwan," "one China, two governments,"
"two Chinas," an "independent Taiwan" or advocate that "the status of
Taiwan remains to be determined."The communique says the US acknowledges
that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is
but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China. The United States
government does not challenge that position. It reaffirms its interest
in a peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question by the Chinese
themselves.
In an interview the reporter had with Henry Kissinger
on February 14, 2013, Kissinger said that when the US-China
relationship began half a century ago, both sides had their own
strategic concerns. Mao Zedong was very concerned about the growing
threat from the Soviet Union, and the US was very concerned about the
Cold War. Thus, there was minimal room for strategic compromise on the
two sides. The US went to discuss its views of the world, and there were
many similarities between the positions held by both sides. This was
reflected in the Shanghai Communiqué, Kissinger said.
In the
history of global diplomacy, the uniqueness of the Shanghai Communiqué
is reflected in that it explicitly includes disagreements that the two
sides had had as well as their common grounds. In the interim, the US
and China coordinated their actions in accordance with the Shanghai
Communiqué, particularly in Asia.
Under the tenure of former US
president Jimmy Carter, China and the US officially established
diplomatic relations. In an interview on November 10, 2013, Carter told
the reporter that when he became president, he was troubled by the lack
of diplomatic relations between the US and China.
"I think it's
time to change that. If the US and China can work together, it will
benefit the countries of the western Pacific and Asia in the future. The
decision to establish ties with China was deeply unpopular in the US as
the US was already allied with the island of Taiwan. I had secret
negotiations with Deng Xiaoping. We started to make progress because I
could feel Deng on the other side of the world decided to change China's
relationship with the outside world, not just with the US," Carter
said.
Strategic ambiguity
In
its relations with China, the US government has always been of two
minds. On the Taiwan question, only the so-called strategic ambiguity
can come to a compromise, but it also fosters forces that either promote
or hinder the development of bilateral relations.
Just after
China and the US established diplomatic relations in 1979, the US
enacted the Taiwan Relations Act to legally "regulate" its relations
with the island of Taiwan. It mentioned that the US "shall provide
Taiwan with arms of a defensive character." In July 1979, Carter
announced the first arms sale to the island of Taiwan which was worth up
to $160 million.
Three years later, China and the US signed, on
August 17, 1982, the Joint Communiqué of the People's Republic of China
and the United States of America, also known as the 8/17 Communiqué,
which included an intended step-by-step and final settlement of the
issue of US arms sales to Taiwan. The US government reiterates that it
has no intention of infringing on Chinese sovereignty and territorial
integrity, or interfering in China's internal affairs, or pursuing a
policy of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan."
However,
secretly, the US proposed in 1982 the so-called Six Assurances to
Taiwan, which said it did not agree to set a date for the termination of
arms sales to Taiwan and it did not agree to the revision of the Taiwan
Relations Act, among others.
The guided-missile destroyer USS Sampson sailed through the Taiwan Straits on April 26, 2022. Photo:VCG
After
the 9/11 attacks, the US became increasingly sensitive to China's
growth. As a matter of fact, China will remain the largest developing
country in the world for a long time and there still remains a huge gap
between China and the US. But while China has repeatedly said that the
vast Pacific Ocean is big enough to accommodate both China and the US
and that China is not subversive but a contributor to the existing
international order, the hegemony of the US continues to be exclusive.
From Obama to Trump, a growing China has been the focus of US global
strategic anxiety.
The US, used to conjuring up imaginary
enemies, has gradually made it clear that China is an adversary with
"real strategic threats." As China is growing, and US strategic anxiety
is rising. In the grand chess game of containing China, the island of
Taiwan has increasingly become a pawn in the eyes of the US.
In
December 2016, former US president Donald Trump had a phone call with
Taiwan's regional leader. The conversation set a precedent as no US
president or president-elect had ever publicly spoken with a Taiwan
regional leader since the establishment of diplomatic relations between
China and the US in 1979.
"I fully understand the 'one China'
policy, but I don't know why we have to be bound by a 'one China' policy
unless we make a deal with China having to do with other things,
including trade," he told Fox in December 2016. Later, after strong
pressure from China, Trump changed his tone, saying that he honors the
one-China policy.
While ostensibly sticking to the one-China
policy, the Trump administration repeatedly crossed the red lines. On
the afternoon of August 9, 2020, US secretary of health and human
services Alex Azar arrived in Taipei for a visit. During the Trump
presidency, arms were sold to the island of Taiwan 11 times, which were
far more than the total amount during Obama's eight years in office. The
Trump administration sold nearly $20 billion worth of arms to Taiwan.
In August 2019, Trump approved a major $8 billion arms sales to the
island of Taiwan involving 66 new F-16C/D fighter jets, the largest
single US arms deal to the island of Taiwan to date.
Former US
secretary of state Mike Pompeo once planned to visit the island of
Taiwan when he was in office. Although he did not make it when he was in
office, after stepping down, Pompeo finally visited the island of
Taiwan in March 2022 to show his support to the Taiwan secessionists.
Dirty tricks
The
Biden administration has reevaluated China-US relations. On July 6,
2021, Kurt Campbell, deputy assistant to the president and coordinator
for Indo-Pacific affairs on the National Security Council, publicly said
the US does not support "Taiwan independence." In September 2021, Biden
said the US does not seek a new Cold War in a UN speech. He reiterated
this during a video conversation with top Chinese leadership on March
18, 2022. Other top US diplomats also made similar statements on
different occasions.
However, the Biden administration does not
behave as it has publicly claimed. The hypocrisy and two-sided nature of
America's China policy is accompanied by an increasingly alarming
crossing of red lines. Many US politicians have staged anti-China
performances.
With the continuous influx of American equipment
into the island of Taiwan, long-term US military-industry complex
profiteering tactics can clearly be seen. In April, during his visit to
the island of Taiwan, US Senator Lindsey Graham made no secret of his
request for the island to buy Boeing aircrafts, which is related to his
constituency. What the US is doing reflects its deep-rooted strategic
anxiety toward a growing China. While it claimed that it does not seek a
Cold War, the Biden administration still treats China as a threat to
its global hegemony. The island of Taiwan has now become the pawn of the
US.
As a pawn, Taiwan may also be abandoned. Trump once said that the island of Taiwan is like the "nib" of a pencil.
Graphic: GT
Graphic: GT
Like
his predecessors, Biden will maintain a tough stance on China while
facing midterm elections. Although the Biden administration is clearly
aware of the bottom lines, it never gives up its attempt to challenge
them.
In response to this US strategy, China issued stern
warnings. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian said on May
31 that "We urge relevant US politicians to earnestly abide by the
one-China principle and the three China-US joint communiques, and
immediately stop official exchanges with Taiwan in any form and refrain
from sending any wrong signals to 'Taiwan independence' separatist
forces. China will continue to take forceful measures to resolutely
safeguard China's sovereignty and territorial integrity."
Wu
Qian, spokesperson for the Ministry of National Defense, said, "The
Chinese People's Liberation Army has always been capable of and
determined in safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial
integrity, as well as defeating separatist forces seeking 'Taiwan
independence' in any form."
Washington, DC, June 7, 2021 –– The Aspen Health Strategy Group (AHSG), an initiative of the Aspen InstituteHealth, Medicine & Society program, announced today that former US Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Alex Azar has joined the group in an ex-officio capacity. Led by AHSG co-chairs, former HHS secretary and former governor, Kathleen Sebelius and former US Senate majority leader, Bill Frist,
the group of 20 senior leaders provides recommendations on important
and complex health issues to promote improvements in policy and
practice. Members include CEOs and other high-level executives at major
corporations, health systems, professional associations, and
foundations, as well as innovative thinkers in academic settings.
Azar joins six other former US Secretaries of Health and Human
Services as ex officio members of AHSG, which is the only organization
that includes this prestigious group:
Sylvia Mathews Burwell, President, American University; 22nd HHS Secretary (2014-2017)
Michael O. Leavitt, Founder and Chairman, Leavitt Partners; 20th HHS Secretary (2005-2009)
Tommy Thompson, President (interim), University of Wisconsin System; 19th HHS Secretary (2001-2005); AHSG co-chair (2015-2021)
Donna Shalala, University of Miami Board of
Trustees Presidential Chair and professor emerita, University of Miami
Herbert Business School; 18th HHS Secretary (1993-2001)
Louis Sullivan, Chair, Sullivan Alliance to Transform America’s Health Professions, Association of Academic Health Centers; 17th HHS Secretary (1989-1993)
David Mathews, President and CEO, Kettering Foundation; 11th US Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare (1975-1977)
Each year, the Aspen Health Strategy Group tackles one issue through a
comprehensive, in-depth study and issues a final report that includes
the Group’s recommendations designed to drive meaningful change, along
with a series of specific action steps for implementing each one of
them. The annual report also includes background papers prepared by
experts in the field. To date, AHSG has published the following
reports:
For 2021, AHSG has chosen incarceration and health for the focus of
its work. Its report on this topic is expected to be released in the
fall.
About the Aspen Institute and its Health, Medicine & Society Program
The Aspen Institute is a global nonprofit organization committed to
realizing a free, just and equitable society. Founded in 1949, the
Institute drives change through dialogue, leadership and action to help
solve the most important challenges facing the United States and the
world. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., the Institute has a campus in
Aspen, Colorado, and an international network of partners.
Established in 2005, the Aspen Institute Health, Medicine &
Society Program brings together influential groups of thought leaders,
decision-makers and the informed public to consider health challenges
facing the U.S. in the 21st century and to identify practical solutions
for addressing them. For more information, visit https://www.aspeninstitute.org/programs/health-medicine-and-society-program/.
It is slim relief that Brenda Fitzgerald was forced to resign last
week as director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Her
final offense in her very short and immoral tenure was investing in
tobacco stocks after being appointed in July, according to a Politico report.
Before being appointed by the Trump administration, the former Georgia
health commissioner had long invested in cigarette companies whose
products kill 480,000 Americans a year and 6 million worldwide, according to her own agency.
She was further compromised by investments in drug, insurance, and
health diagnostic firms that posed conflicts in dealing with cancer,
opioids, and dissemination of health information. She told the New York Times that she was considering renewing CDC ties with Coca-Cola.
In Georgia, she was a cheerleader for Coca-Cola’s physical fitness
programs. The world’s largest soda company, based in Atlanta, was exposed in 2015
for funding scientists who said America’s obesity crisis was all about
exercise, not the excess empty calories from sugary drinks. As
documented by the Union of Concerned Scientists, Coca-Cola was following
an all-too-common tactic of the corporate disinformation playbook—hiring scientists to produce results that obscure a product’s harm.
But her departure hardly guarantees that we can count on the CDC to
protect the nation’s health. For the moment, the acting director is Anne Schuchat,
a respected infectious disease expert, known for leading domestic and
global response teams against flu viruses in the US and infectious
diseases in Africa and China, including Ebola and SARS. A member of the
National Academy of Medicine and a rear admiral in the United States
Public Health Service, her disease detective work was the model for a lead character Kate Winslet played in the movie “Contagion.”
The ethical conundrum of Alex Azar
It is rare for acting directors, even if immortalized by actresses,
to win a full appointment. So who comes next bears serious watching,
especially since Alex Azar
is the new secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), the department
that oversees the CDC, and he himself is an ethical conundrum.
Azar, a lawyer who clerked for the late conservative Supreme Court
Justice Antonin Scalia, and was on George W. Bush’s legal team for the
2000 Florida recount, became general counsel at HHS and ultimately
deputy secretary of the department. He left in 2007 to become the top
lobbyist for the Eli Lilly pharmaceutical giant and worked his way to
the presidency of the company in 2012.
When President Trump nominated him in November to replace Tom Price, who abused taxpayer dollars by traveling by private jet, the president tweeted
Azar “will be a star for better healthcare and lower drug prices.” When
Azar was sworn in on January 29, Trump, who has repeatedly said that
drug companies get away with “murder,” said prices would now “come
rocketing down.”
From drug company CEO to people’s champion on drug prices? Unlikely.
There is no evidence to remotely suggest that Azar, the first pharmaceutical executive
ever to head HHS, according to the Washington Post, will miraculously
transform from drug company CEO into the people’s champion on drug
prices. In July, the Indianapolis Business Journal reported
that in the last 20 years, while the price of milk went up 23 percent,
the cost of a Dodge minivan rose 21 percent and general inflation was 32
percent, the price of Lilly’s insulin drugs Humalog and Humulin
skyrocketed by 1,157 percent and nearly 800 percent respectively. A vial
of Humalog that cost $21 in 1996 cost $274.70 last summer.
Lilly is a defendant along with global diabetes drug titans Novo Nordisk and Sanofi in a class action price-fixing lawsuit
filed last year in federal court in Massachusetts. According to the
lawsuit, Lilly’s Humulin shot up 325 percent from just 2010 to 2015, a
period covering Azar’s first three years at the helm. Several news stories and guest columns last year featured the difficulty many American diabetics have in affording insulin.
One out of every eight American adults has diabetes, and the lower the
socioeconomic status, the higher the incidence of the disease.
According to the CDC, diabetes was listed as any cause of death on a
quarter million US death certificates in 2015, and the annual direct and
indirect cost of diabetes to the nation is a quarter billion dollars.
Several small studies over the last two decades have shown
that high percentages of patients admitted to hospitals with life
threatening diabetic ketoacidosis became sick after discontinuing
insulin therapy because it was unaffordable.
Lilly blamed the rise in drug prices to other parts of the health care system, but it refused to disclose to the Indianapolis Business Journal its net prices. Lilly ranks 132nd in the Fortune 500 with profits last year of $2.7 billion.
Keeping a watchful eye
Pressed in his Senate confirmation hearings on drug pricing, Azar
acknowledged they were high but offered no major solutions, having
opposed the Affordable Care Act and saying the government should not
have a heavy hand in negotiating drug prices. As average Americans
struggle with diabetes drug costs, Azar made $3.6 million
in his last year at Lilly in salary and severance. He also sold off
$3.4 million in Lilly stock, according to the Associated Press.
Azar’s light hand on out-of control drug prices merits a very
watchful eye over both HHS and CDC. We need to make sure that our
government officials, especially those making decisions about access to
health care, advocacy against diseases, and scientific research aren’t
beholden to profitable companies producing drugs, cigarettes, soda, or
other health-related products or services. Before her departure,
Fitzgerald came under fire when the Washington Post reported that certain words were being banned from budget requests, such as “evidence based” and “diversity.”
Trump says that under Azar, drug prices will come rocketing down. In
actuality, the watch is on to see if Azar instead is another incoming
missile from Trump against federal protection of the nation’s health.
On Monday evening, the Rockefeller Center for Public
Policy hosted former U.S. Health and Human Services secretary Alex Azar
’88 in a talk entitled “Operation Warp Speed: Lessons from the Most
Successful and Important Public-Private Partnership Since the Apollo
Project.” Addressing a live audience in Filene Auditorium, Azar spoke
about his work to plan and execute “Operation Warp Speed,” a federal
effort during the administration of former president Donald Trump to
support and speed up private development of COVID-19 vaccines.
While serving as HHS secretary under Trump, Azar also served as chair
of the White House Coronavirus Task Force from January until February
2020, when former vice president Mike Pence replaced him in the role.
Prior to joining the Trump administration, Azar was general counsel and
deputy HHS secretary under former president George W. Bush and served as
president of the U.S. division of Eli Lilly and Company, a
pharmaceutical company.
Since Azar resigned from his position in Jan. 2021, his response to the coronavirus pandemic has attracted criticism,
including from health professionals citing Azar’s delay in alerting
Trump to the threat of COVID-19 and the CDC’s decision to develop and
distribute its own COVID-19 tests rather than requesting them from the
World Health Organization.
Government professor Jason Barabas
said in an interview after the event that Azar’s lecture took place as
part of the Brooks Family series, a lecture series funded to “foster a
balanced discussion on campus of national and international issues.”
Barabas said that as the former head of one of the largest cabinet
agencies in America, Azar is a guest of “national stature.”
“During a time when we’re confronting a global pandemic, he’s got
real world policy experience that is exceptionally relevant to what’s
going on today,” Barabas said. “He’s widely credited as being the
architect of Operation Warp Speed — I think that’s interesting in its
own right, especially in this case where the government and private
sector could work together to essentially speed up the development of
vaccine therapeutics.”
Azar began the discussion by describing the unprecedented timeline of
the COVID-19 vaccine development. While vaccine development typically
takes between 10 and 15 years, Azar said that within “just a couple of
months,” around "100 candidate vaccines against [COVID-19] had been
developed."
“We spent $2 trillion of taxpayer money in March of
2020 to deal with the consequences of COVID relief,” Azar said.
“Effectively, any amount of money that you could credibly spend that
would bring vaccines sooner and help either prevent infection or reduce
the risk of hospitalization for people is going to have an infinite
return on investment.”
Azar added that his time in the
pharmaceutical industry gave him “exposure to the drug industry,” as
well as an understanding of how difficult drug manufacturing can be.
Faced with the COVID-19 pandemic, Azar said the administration adopted a
“Manhattan Project attitude,” harnessing the “full power” of the U.S.
government and public-private partnerships.
According to Azar, the administration set a goal to have
FDA-authorized vaccines ready by the end of 2020, with enough vaccines
for every American by the beginning of 2021.
“I reached out to many of my cabinet colleagues — Defense Department,
Veterans Affairs, Homeland Security, Agriculture, the Energy
Department,” Azar said. “[Government] powers are incredible — they have
to be applied where there’s the political will to apply them.”
Adding to this, Azar said that governmental power had to be leveraged alongside the private sector.
“Warp Speed is this bright light of action that grants hope,” Azar said.
During an audience Q&A session, Azar described the lessons he
learned during the Bush administration’s handling of the severe acute
respiratory syndrome virus, including the “importance of transparency.”
“We’ve got to have complete transparency around these infectious
diseases wherever they occur in the world — unfortunately, I don’t think
we saw that in this case from China initially,” Azar said. “It’s not
one country’s problem to try to solve.”
Azar also responded to an audience question regarding public-private
partnerships and declining trust in experts within today’s Republican
Party, again emphasizing the importance of transparency.
“From a public health perspective, improving our data systems,
improving the coordination around the diagnostics industry, preparedness
and early countermeasures make [vaccine development] a more
predictable, streamlined approval process,” Azar said. “The politics
around this, as more of a technocratic person, have been different for
me.”
Michael Guptill ’22 said she came to the lecture to learn more about Azar’s perspective on the COVID-19 vaccine development.
“I didn’t know that he pulled all the levers to bring the whole
operation together,” Guptill said. “It’s really cool to hear how they
thought through the problem to successfully coordinate a solution.”
Blake McGill ’22, a public programming assistant at the Rockefeller
Center, said she had met Azar previously during a public policy class.
“We didn’t delve into the nitty gritty of Operation Warp Speed, so I
did not expect him to go step by step and talk about all the business
principles,” McGill said. “I knew that he had had private sector
experience, but I didn’t understand all of the insights on the
manufacturing side and the business practices he was able to bring into
the government and adapt for the public sector.”
Blake McGill is a former member of The Dartmouth staff.
During the talk, Azar
discussed the unprecedented timeline of the COVID-19 vaccine and
leveraging relationships between the government and private sector.
SOLO LA FONDAZIONE DI UNO STATO-SANTUARIO PUO’ SALVARE L’ITALIA:
UN LIBERO STATO DI CITTADINI LIBERI, GOVERNATO DA UN’ASSEMBLEA
COSTITUENTE PERMANENTE DI TUTTI I CITTADINI, GESTITO DA UNA BANCA DEL
POPOLO ITALIANO DI PROPRIETA’ DEI CITTADINI ITALIANI, UNO STATO CREATO E
FORMATO DA UN ESERCITO DI LIBERAZIONE PERMANENTE, UNO STATO DOVE
MICROSOFT, GOOGLE, EBAY, FB, TWITTER, GS, JPMorgan Chase, BofA, Morgan
Stanley, Citigroup, UBS, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, AstraZeneca,
Pfizer, Moderna, J&J E COMPAGNIA CANTANTE, BLACKROCK, VANGUARD E
STATE STREET STANNO A GUARDARE DA FUORI CON IL CANNOCCHIALE E NEL LIBERO
STATO ITALIANO NON CI METTERANNO MAI PIEDE, ESATTAMENTE COME IN RUSSIA.
CHI PUO’ E DEVE ARRESTARE DRAGHI E MATTARELLA, SE NON UNO STATO?
CHI PUO’ ARRESTARE KLAUS SCHWAB E GLI PSICOPATICI CHE LO SEGUONO E LO DIFENDONO, DENTRO E FUORI DELLA SVIZZERA?
CHI PUO’ E DEVE ARRESTARE E PROCESSARE SPERANZA, DI MAIO, CONTE, GRILLO, CASALEGGIO?
CHI PUO’ E DEVE ARRESTARE I RAPPRESENTANTI DI QUESTA PATTUMIERA CHE E’ DIVENTATA LA POLITICA AMERICANA?
CHI PUO’ PROCESSARE I CRIMINALI DELLA NATO?
CHI PUO’ ARRESTARE E PROCESSARE GUTIERRES, THEDROS E TUTTI I CRIMINALI CHE GESTISCONO LE ORGANIZAZZIONI INTERNAZIONALI?
CHI PUO’ ARRESTARE E PROCESSARE LA MERKEL, LA VDL, IL SEGRETARIO GENERALE DELLA NATO?
SOLO UNO STATO, UN VERO STATO, CERTAMENTE NON UNO STATO FATTO DI FANCAZZISTI COME I VIGLIONE E I MELUZZI.
SOLO UN VERO STATO CHE SI E’ LIBERATO MILITARMENTE ED E’ IN GRADO DI DIFERENDERE MILITARMENTE LA PROPRIA LIBERTA’.
LA CINA A TUTTI QUESTI PARASSITI GLI HA DATO ALLA TESTA. LA
COVIDCRAZIA FINIRA’ ANCHE IN CINA E ANCHE IN CINA I RESPONSABILI
RISPONDERANNO DI FRONTE A TRIBUNALI POPOLARI VERI.
ALTRI PARTITI? ELEZIONI?
MA FATEMI IL PIACERE …
MONSIGNOR VIGANO’ VA BENISSIMO.
I VIGLIONE E I MELUZZI, COME I FUSARO, I RADIORADIO, BYOBLU E QUANTI
PRETENDONO FALSAMENTE DI ATTEGGIARSI A DISSENSO E A RESISTENZA, NO: SONO
PILLOLE PER ADDORMENTARE QUELLI CHE NON SI SONO MAI ADDORMENTATI E PER
RIADDORMENTARE QUELLI CHE SI STANNO SVEGLIANDO.
CONTINUATE A DONARE A BYLOBLU. COM E A TUTTI GLI ALTRI FANCAZZISTI
D’ITALIA INVECE DI CREARE UN ESERCITO DI LIBERAZIONE NAZIONALE REALE.
LA RIVOLUZIONE, QUELLA VERA, E’ TUTT’ALTRA COSA.
I FILOSOFI POSSONO PARLARE SOLO DOVE E QUANDO HANNO DUE PASTI AL GIORNO, E I LAVORATORI TRE.
Ma quanto successo avrebbe il cattolicesimo se mons. Viganò con quanto dice fosse Papa.
Penso che le chiese tornerebbero piene di persone intelligenti, realiste e il mondo avrebbe una nuova speranza.
La grande menzogna è oramai chiara.
Dobbiamo aspettare che diventi evidente almeno all’ 80% della popolazione.
Siamo tutti stanchi di LGBT e tutte le porcherie che i depravati giornalisti e politici vogliono imporre.
A EN
“Una nuova verità scientifica non trionfa perché i suoi oppositori si
convincono e vedono la luce, quanto piuttosto perché alla fine muoiono, e
al loro posto si forma una nuova generazione a cui i nuovi concetti
diventano familiari.”
Questa frase – citata dallo storico e filosofo Thomas Samuel Kuhn – è di Max Planck: il padre della fisica quantistica. https://www.sperling.it/blog/brevi-riflessioni-di-fisica-quantistica-una-verita-sulla-verita-scientifica
Ora, a parte Kuhn e la sua filosofia (che dio lo perdoni…), è
tragicamente vero che le persone ben difficilmente cambiano idea e
ammettono di aver avuto torto.
Vale anche tra gli individui intelligenti che si occupano di scienza (quella vera…), si figuri tra i covidioti…
P.S. Ritengo che la menzogna dell’usurocrazia criminale sarà prima o
poi evidente alla maggioranza della popolazione, ma non perché i
covidioti avranno mutato opinione (pochi riconosceranno l’inganno di cui
sono vittime) bensì poiché saranno morti (magari grazie alle
“vaccinazioni”) e in questo modo gli intelligenti, che avendo evitato di
credere alle menzogne del regime saranno sopravvissuti, diventeranno
maggioranza.
Non credo ci vorranno secoli e neanche svariati decenni, solo pochi anni.
Ad ogni modo le parole di Monsignor Viganò andrebbero scolpite nella
roccia, anche se risveglieranno pochi, ma la verità va detta, è un
dovere morale.
Saluti.
Sempre a EN
poi qualcuno che capisce e ammette, prima di tutto a se stesso, di
essere stato raggirato e di aver compromesso la propria salute con i
“vaccini” di Speranza c’è (ma a mio avviso saranno sempre pochi) https://twitter.com/ZittaNonSto/status/1535703156511887360
“Abbiamo appena saputo che la coppia che ha tirato il drink a Bassetti
non era #novax ma vaccinati con 3 dosi con parente danneggiato da
vaccino anche lui con 3 dosi e a quanto pare vi si stanno rivoltando
contro proprio quelli che avete ingannato Ora che hai da dire?🤔”
MORTE ALLA MASSONERIA, ORA E PER SEMPRE!!!
MORTE A KLAUS SCHUAB!!! MORTE ALLA MASSONERIA!!! ORA E SEMPRE!!!
Ma quanto successo avrebbe il cattolicesimo se mons. Viganò con quanto dice fosse Papa.
Penso che le chiese tornerebbero piene di persone intelligenti, realiste e il mondo avrebbe una nuova speranza.
La grande menzogna è oramai chiara.
Dobbiamo aspettare che diventi evidente almeno all’ 80% della popolazione.
Siamo tutti stanchi di LGBT e tutte le porcherie che i depravati giornalisti e politici vogliono imporre.
A EN
“Una nuova verità scientifica non trionfa perché i suoi oppositori si convincono e vedono la luce, quanto piuttosto perché alla fine muoiono, e al loro posto si forma una nuova generazione a cui i nuovi concetti diventano familiari.”
Questa frase – citata dallo storico e filosofo Thomas Samuel Kuhn – è di Max Planck: il padre della fisica quantistica.
https://www.sperling.it/blog/brevi-riflessioni-di-fisica-quantistica-una-verita-sulla-verita-scientifica
Ora, a parte Kuhn e la sua filosofia (che dio lo perdoni…), è tragicamente vero che le persone ben difficilmente cambiano idea e ammettono di aver avuto torto.
Vale anche tra gli individui intelligenti che si occupano di scienza (quella vera…), si figuri tra i covidioti…
P.S. Ritengo che la menzogna dell’usurocrazia criminale sarà prima o poi evidente alla maggioranza della popolazione, ma non perché i covidioti avranno mutato opinione (pochi riconosceranno l’inganno di cui sono vittime) bensì poiché saranno morti (magari grazie alle “vaccinazioni”) e in questo modo gli intelligenti, che avendo evitato di credere alle menzogne del regime saranno sopravvissuti, diventeranno maggioranza.
Non credo ci vorranno secoli e neanche svariati decenni, solo pochi anni.
Ad ogni modo le parole di Monsignor Viganò andrebbero scolpite nella roccia, anche se risveglieranno pochi, ma la verità va detta, è un dovere morale.
Saluti.
Sempre a EN
poi qualcuno che capisce e ammette, prima di tutto a se stesso, di essere stato raggirato e di aver compromesso la propria salute con i “vaccini” di Speranza c’è (ma a mio avviso saranno sempre pochi)
https://twitter.com/ZittaNonSto/status/1535703156511887360
“Abbiamo appena saputo che la coppia che ha tirato il drink a Bassetti non era #novax ma vaccinati con 3 dosi con parente danneggiato da vaccino anche lui con 3 dosi e a quanto pare vi si stanno rivoltando contro proprio quelli che avete ingannato Ora che hai da dire?🤔”