Most Americans No Longer Trust Government COVID Info, Poll Finds

 

Most Americans No Longer Trust Government COVID Info, Poll Finds

by Zero Hedge
Trust in Biden plunging even among Democrats
Image Credit:
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
SHARE
Fund the InfoWar. Donate Now!
Keep up to date with our latest:
EMAIL
Sign Up Now
Have an important tip? Let us know.EMAIL US HERE.

Americans’ trust in President Biden continues to slide, according to the latest Axios/Ipsos Coronavirus Index.

The poll found that fewer than half of the respondents trust the president regarding accurate information about COVID-19, a 13-percentage decline since his inauguration in January. 

Axios/Ipsos found trust in President Biden, the federal government and the mainstream media to deliver accurate information about the virus pandemic slumped in tandem with no end in sight. 

Only 45% of respondents said they trust the president to provide accurate information about the virus, down from 58% in January. The result of this poll is exemplified in Biden’s outlandish comment on Monday about pre-pandemic life can only return if 97% of Americans are vaccinated.

Compared with rating earlier this year, Biden is losing trust among Democrats (an 11-percentage point decline to 81% trust a great deal or fair amount) and Republicans (a 10-point drop to 11%). He has experienced the most significant decline in confidence among independents (a 17-point decline to 42%).

Similarly, less than half of Americans (49%) trust the federal government to provide accurate COVID-19 information, down from 54% earlier this month. 

“Delta and other issues have undermined the public’s perception,” Cliff Young, president of Ipsos public affairs, told Axios. He said that no clear resolution to ending the pandemic is the main contributor to the decline in trust. 

What’s not helping with regaining trust is the administration’s sweeping new federal vaccine mandate for 100 million Americans (with no discussion of natural immunity), many of which are private-sector employees as well as health care workers and federal contractors. People across the country, if they’re in health care or law enforcement, among others, are walking off the job in droves because of the mandate. 

The survey was taken with a little more than 1,100 adults between Sept. 24–27 and has a margin of error of 3.2 percentage points. 

These findings are a big concern for the Democratic president and his party ahead of the 2022 midterms. It appears Biden’s honeymoon period is over, and the first real glimpse of this was in late July when a Gallup opinion poll found his approval ratings were slipping

Compound the botched exit of Afghanistan, Mexico–US border crisis, and soaring food, gas, and rent prices, the president’s ratings continue to tumble. 

Meanwhile, former President Trump received a healthy boost in support following the Republican National Convention last month.

The Peter Daszak Eco Health Alliance ruse is disintegrating after the smoking gun was discovered.

L'INGHILTERRA E' FAMOSA PER AVER FONDATO DEMOCRAZIE LIBERALI IN TUTTO IL MONDO.

 Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here.

Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
613
1
By John Rolls (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:5
Last hour:5
Last 24 hours:98
Total:663

Apartheid Australia: Hell On Earth!! - The Ron Paul Liberty Report Must Video

11Shares
facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
pinterest sharing button
linkedin sharing button
messenger sharing button
reddit sharing button
tumblr sharing button
vk sharing button
telegram sharing button
sharethis sharing button


***Support BeforeItsNews By Trying HerbAnomic Natural Health Building Products Including Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex, Immusist Beverage Concentrate & UltraCur Bio-Available Curcumin—NOW NEW HNEX HydroNano Extracellular Oxygen Delivery System Product–SEE BELOW! Click Here For More Information & To Order!***

EXPERIENCE OXYGENATION AT THE CELLULAR LEVELClick Here

LE MERAVIGLIOSE SORTI E PROGRESSIVE DELLA CORPORATOCRAZIA PLANETARIA

 

Slurs and swastikas: Tesla under fire for racism — again

Fresh accusations of racism have landed US carmaker Tesla in court. The electric car manufacturer has faced similar allegations in the past.

    
Tesla factory in Fremont with cars parked outside

Over 100 people have sued Tesla for discrimination since 2018

Owen Diaz can put up with a lot. As a Black man in America, racial insults are practically part of everyday life. But Diaz says what he experienced as an employee at Tesla surpassed everything.

In 2015 and 2016, the 53-year old worked in a Tesla production facility in Fremont, California. There he operated elevators and watched that car parts and metal made it onto the right assembly line. Instead of a pleasant and professional work atmosphere, however, he was regularly subjected to such unacceptable conditions that he finally felt driven to quit. Derogatory comments and hate messages became part of his daily life at the production facility, Diaz said.

Now, nearly five years later, Diaz is facing his former employer in court. He is suing Tesla for racism and discrimination. The factories were a "hotbed of racist behavior," according to the indictment, which will be heard in a California court on Wednesday. Black employees at Tesla, it says, are subjected to constant and serious harassment.

Nazis and the KKK

The automaker run by Elon Musk, for its part, denies the allegations. In Diaz's case, Tesla said it had no knowledge of any possible misconduct. The company reiterated that it objects to any form of discrimination, harassment or unfair treatment and that every allegation of such is taken seriously and investigated. "We will never be able to stop every single person in the factory from engaging in inappropriate conduct, but we will continue to do everything that we can to encourage the right behavior and to take action whenever something bad happens."

For Diaz, it's not nearly enough. He wants compensation for the mental suffering he endured. "You hear, 'Hey, boy, come here, N-----.' or 'Go back to Africa,'" Diaz told The New York Times in 2018. "You ask yourself at some point, 'Where is my line?'"

There were also reports of racist graffiti and drawings visible around the factory. On the walls of the toilet rooms, for example, swastikas were said to be prominently visible, along with the initials "KKK"#," the abbreviation for the Ku Klux Klan, a white supremacist hate group in the United States. Diaz's own shift supervisor once painted a figure meant to represent a person from Africa: a cartoon with thick lips and a bone in his hair, with the word "Boooo" written underneath. That was when Diaz decided enough was enough.

0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 90%
 
Watch video08:58

Electric mobility: Tata versus Tesla

Only temporary workers can sue

Diaz is far from the only one accusing Tesla of fostering an unacceptable work environment in its factories. Between 2018 and March 2021 alone, 120 people have attempted to sue Tesla for discrimination. Nine of those lawsuits were shot down due to insufficient evidence. But all other complainants were granted permission to sue. A total of 104 affidavits comprise the 500-page claim filed in March.

The number of unreported cases is likely to be much higher. The reason for this is so-called arbitration agreements, which Tesla employees must sign when they start their jobs, agreeing not to pull the company into court in the event of disputes. But some, including Diaz, were temporary workers, hired through staffing agencies, and thus did not have to sign such clauses. Everyone else has, at most, the option of settling disputes out of court through arbitration, which prevents class-action lawsuits.

Above all: Save money

Far from an isolated case, such practices are widespread among fast-growing companies, which often have little regard for the needs of their employees, experts say.

"Firms in Silicon Valley combine sophisticated technology with systems of labor relations that are retrograde and often out of the 19th century," says labor historian Nelson Lichtenstein, who conducts research at the Center for the Study of Work, Labor and Democracy at the University of California, Santa Barbara. In this way, companies like Tesla try to avoid legal, moral and social responsibility for their workers, in part to save money. "But even more important is their ability to fire at will and/or enforce high levels of exploitative production," Lichtenstein says.

Business groups claim that arbitration is faster and more efficient for all parties involved. But worker representatives argue these procedures are nontransparent and that they are often to the disadvantage of workers.

"My personal view is that Tesla does not focus on investigating and preventing these claims," Larry Organ, Diaz's attorney, told the online magazine Protocol. "They are really focused on making cars, and less focused about their employees' conduct in the workplace, based on the discovery that we've done in five different cases."

0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 90%
 
Watch video07:25

Racism in the workplace

Tesla's aggressive tactics prove successful

Organ has represented former Tesla employees against the carmaker in the past. In the vast majority of cases, the company has a strong initial reaction to the accusations, firmly denying it at first but later going for a full-frontal attack.

In a 2017 blog post, Tesla said Organ "has a long track record of extorting money for meritless claims and using the threat of media attacks and expensive trial costs to get companies to settle."

"At Tesla, we would rather pay 10 times the settlement demand in legal fees and fight to the ends of the Earth than give in to extortion and allow this abuse of the legal system."

Tesla's aggressive tactics have proven extraordinarily successful thus far. Of nearly 90 labor arbitration claims filed between 2016 and the beginning of 2021, the company has lost only one. It was a case very similar to Diaz's. Nearly two months ago, a US court ruled that Melvin Berry, a 47-year-old former employee, was subjected for years to racial insults from his superiors. Tesla must now pay a million-dollar fine. The majority of the money will go towards court costs and legal fees, but $250,000 (€214,000) will go directly to Melvin Berry, of which $100,000 will be compensation for emotional distress.

 This article has been translated from German.

SARKOZY VA DENTRO PER FINANZIAMENTO ILLEGALE, MACRON VA DENTRO PER COSPIRAZIONE CONTRO LO STATO, TRADIMENTO DELLA COSTITUZIONE, GENOCIDIO E VIOLAZIONI VARIE DELLA CEDU

 

France’s Sarkozy convicted of illegal campaign financing

Ex-president handed one-year sentence for spending almost twice the legal amount during failed 2012 re-election bid.

Sarkozy, France’s president from 2007 to 2012, has vigorously denied wrongdoing in the case [File: Christophe Ena/AP]
Sarkozy, France’s president from 2007 to 2012, has vigorously denied wrongdoing in the case [File: Christophe Ena/AP]

A Paris court has handed former French President Nicolas Sarkozy a one-year prison sentence after finding him guilty of illegal campaign financing of his failed 2012 re-election bid.

Sarkozy, 66, is unlikely to go to jail despite Thursday’s ruling.

He is expected to appeal the sentence, a move that will in effect suspend it.

The judge said he could serve the sentence at home with an electronic tag.

Sarkozy, France’s president from 2007 to 2012, was accused of having spent almost twice the maximum legal amount of 22.5 million euros ($26m) on a re-election bid that he lost to the Socialist Party’s Francois Hollande.

Part of the sum was allegedly used to fund extravagant campaign rallies and then hire public relations agency Bygmalion to mask the real cost of the events.

At Sarkozy’s five-week trial in May and June, the prosecution portrayed him as having a “cavalier” attitude to the public money available to candidates during campaigning, saying he ignored warnings from his accountants about the ballooning costs.

Al Jazeera’s Natacha Butler, reporting from Paris, said the court’s judge had concluded it was “clear that Sarkozy must have known that his campaign team were spending over the legal limit”.

The verdict was harsher than expected, she said, adding that with the latest conviction, Sarkozy’s political career was definitively “over”.

“Prosecutors had asked for a year-long sentence but with six months suspended,” she said.

“And in terms of the symbolism, it won’t be lost on the public that this verdict sends out a message to political candidates and parties that they cannot just act with impunity,” she said.

France is heading into a presidential election next year.

Sarkozy denies wrongdoing

The ruling came after Sarkozy was found guilty on March 1 of corruption and influence peddling in another case. He was given a year in prison, and a two-year suspended prison sentence in that case, but is free pending an appeal.

Sarkozy, who was not present in court on Thursday, has repeatedly denied wrongdoing in both cases.

He told the court in June that he had not been involved in the logistics of his campaign, nor aware of how money was spent during the election run-up.

“Can you imagine me going into a meeting to discuss the cost of flags?” he said, before claiming he had “too much to do”.

“From the moment I was told things were in order, I had no reason to give it more thought.”

But the court ultimately decided Sarkozy was made aware of the overspending, that he did not act on it and that it was not necessary for him to approve each individual expenditure to be responsible.

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA AND NEWS AGENCIES

Lettera aperta al signor Luigi di Maio, deputato del Popolo Italiano

ZZZ, 04.07.2020 C.A. deputato Luigi di Maio sia nella sua funzione di deputato sia nella sua funzione di ministro degli esteri ...