The man with visions: once he predicted that the Philippines would become a "high income" economy, meaning probably his own income only, now he predicts a fluffy security future for the Philippines like Singapore. For fascists of this caliber Sing Sing would be sufficient.
Cayetano: PH becoming more like Singapore
'People now feel safer'
MANILA – Senator Alan Peter Cayetano said on Monday that Filipinos should be grateful for the Duterte administration’s campaign against illegal drugs and criminality, saying the Philippine is slowly becoming like Singapore in terms of safety.
Cayetano came anew to the defense of President Rodrigo Duterte, amid concerns over the government’s bloody war on drugs that has claimed at least 1,600 lives based on monitoring by the ABS-CBN Investigative and Research Group.
The staunch Duterte supporter said, because of Duterte’s efforts, the Philippines is now a safer place for Filipinos.
“It’s not perfect. In fact the president very candidly said he needs another six months pero let us be honest to ourselves, it is happening. The Philippines is becoming more like Singapore in terms of being able to walk the streets at anytime at night,” Cayetano said in a privilege speech.
“What do we want? Bumalik tayo six years past o ipagpatuloy natin ang pagbabago? Do we go back or do we go forward? More of the same or change? Gusto ba natin na takot ang tao at ang criminal hindi takot?”
(What do we want, go back six years past or continue the change? Do we go back or do we go forward? More of the same or change? Do we want an environment where the people are afraid and the criminals are not?)
Cayetano said much more needs to be done under Duterte’s campaign on drugs, but he claimed many gains have been achieved with just two months into the new administration.
“Dalawang buwan pa lang mahigit, may pakiramdam na ng kaligtasan. (In just two months, there is already a sense of safety.) I’m not saying that people now feel safe, I’m saying they feel safer,” he said.
Duterte earlier admitted that he did not realize the magnitude of the country's drug problem when he declared his self-imposed deadline of three to six months during the campaign.
"Maybe just give me an extension of another six months. I did not have that idea that there were thousands of people in the drug business and worst is they are operated now by people in government," Duterte said.
"The problem is I cannot kill them all," he noted. "Even if I wanted to, I cannot do it."
STOP CHATTING!
PERMANENT constitutional conventions in each and every country in the world NOW NOW NOW: Arrest all judges, including all CONSTITUTIONAL judges, who have been lenient, negligent and complacent with the military plandemic wars, arrest ALL corporate crook managers complacent and cooperative with the military, the political and the medical crooks of the operation, DISSOLVE the CIA, the DHS, the NHS, the DoD, the Army, the Navy and the Air Force,the WHO, the UN, the EU, the BIS, the IBRD, the IMF, dissolve and destroy forever all ABC arms production facilities and labs ANYWHERE in the world belonging to ANY state, arrest presidents Clinton, Obama, Biden, Draghi, von der Leyen and their local cronies, confiscate and dissolve FB, Google, Microsoft, GAVI, BMGF, Instagram, Twitter, Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, AstraZeneca etc. etc: CLEAN UP THIS AUGIAS STABLE FOREVER!!! THIS IS NOT A TASK FOR JUDGES: IT IS A TASK FOR CONSTITUTIONAL LAWGIVERS.
WHAT IS NEEDED NOW, RIGHT NOW, IS AN ARMY CAPABLE AND WILLING TO MOVE ON DAVOS AND ON THE BIS AND EQUALIZE THEM TO THE GROUND. THEN EQUALIZE THE REMAINING FINANCIAL AND BANKING SYSTEM TO THE GROUND. THEY DO NOT LIVE ON "MONEY", THEY FEED AND PARASITIZE ON CREDIT AND ON YOUR DEBTS. TAKE CREDIT AND DEBT AWAY, CREATE A PEOPLE'S BANK, AND ALL WILL COME TO A SCREECHING HALT.
THE EASY PART WILL BE TO DEPOSIT THEM IN THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS THEY PLANNED FOR US.
TRUMP, OR ANY OTHER POLITICIAN, WILL NOT HELP YOU WITH THIS, FORGET IT, IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN: HE IS INCAPABLE OF THINKING AND ACTING THAT FAR.
STOP CHATTING MEDICALESE, WRITING "SOCIAL" CRAP: IT IS LATE, VERY LATE, VERY VERY VERY LATE, BUT NOT TOO LATE.
THE NEXT ATTACK AGAINST HUMANITY MUST NOT BE REACTED AGAINST, BUT PREVENTED. STOP CHATTING.
IF YOU DO NOT HAVE THE BALLS FOR FIGHTING: SUPPORT WHO IS WILLING AND ABLE TO FIGHT.
FOR THE REST THERE ARE THREE INFALLIBLE METHODS:
1. BOYCOTT THEM IN ANYTHING YOU DO
2. BOYCOTT THEM IN ANYTHING YOU DO
3. BOYCOTT THEM IN ANYTHING YOU DO
TRUMP WILL NEVER DO ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN DO BETTER BY YOURSELF.
DO NOT WAIT FOR THE ELECTION, ACT NOW NOW NOW. MAKE THEM A NEW YEAR "SURPRISE":
LOCK THEM ALL DOWN!!!
I AM TALKING TO THE MEN AMONG YOU, IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO TELL THE WOMEN, BECAUSE MOST OF THEM ARE ALREADY READY TO GO, THEY ALREADY KNOW EVERYTHING THAT NEEDS TO BE KNOWN:
YOU HAVE TO DIE, BUT IT IS YOUR CHOICE TO DIE OR NOT TO DIE LIKE THE SHEEPS AND THE CRICKETS THAT THEY INTEND TO MAKE OUT OF YOU.
GIVE THE RIGHT EXAMPLE TO YOUR CHILDREN AND TO THOSE WHO MAY SURVIVE THIS, DO THE RIGHT THING ONLY ONCE IN YOUR LIFE, EVEN IF IT MAY BE THE LAST.
WE SHALL OVERCOME!!!
JUSTICE, HUMANITY AND SACRED LIFE SHALL OVERCOME!!!
Comment for Dr. Paul Elias Alexander
Dear Dr. Alexander:
I have already 800+ MB of email from you on my computer.
Please let Trump do SOMETHING RADICAL, otherwise you will full my computer.
Thank you.
A GLOBAL french revolution may be in the making??? https://rumble.com/v45fvg3-excerpt-from-tucker-carlsons-interview-with-dr.-bret-weinstein-on-jan-5-202.html
https://rumble.com/v45fvg3-excerpt-from-tucker-carlsons-interview-with-dr.-bret-weinstein-on-jan-5-202.html
Condemn Duterte Even If You’re A Supporter. Your man may win and become president but in the process you have lost. In making him a winner you have made yourself a loser.
Wednesday, April 20, 2016
"Condemn Duterte Even If You’re A Supporter. Your man may win and become president but in the process you have lost. In making him a winner you have made yourself a loser. "
See - X - Condemn Duterte Even If You’re A Supporter
"x x x.
By:
Carlos S. Hernandez Jr.
When he advocated for extrajudicial killings, you remained silent.
When he called someone bayot (gay), you also remained silent.
When he cracked that rape joke, even intimating the he should be the first to commit it, you also remained silent.
There are times when you break your silence and start defending him.
You remain silent even if in your heart of hearts you know that what he said should be condemned. This is because you believe that he is still the best among all the presidential candidates. He must not be criticized because the other candidates deserve to be criticized more. By hook or by crook, he must win. Therefore you reduce everything, all issues bar none, into a mere political stratagem on how to make him win even at the expense of the values you hold dear, even at the expense of the rule of law, of the principles of equality and human dignity.
The only lens you are using now in assessing his words and actions is the outcome of the presidential elections. The other lenses you have consistently used before have been thrown out of the window: the lens that says laws must be humane, the lens that says we are all equal, and the lens that says we must never contribute to the development of a culture that condones rape. All the other lenses you kept in your conscience before are now gone because this is just about him, not about us, about his winning the elections, not about the things that we have been tenaciously fighting for before he ambivalently declared his intention to run for presidency. Your sense of right and wrong has been blurred when you started to support his candidacy.
When he declared that he is going to remove algebra, trigonometry, and calculus from the education curriculum and replace them with business math, you also remained silent. You forgot that you are staunch and vocal advocate of making Philippine education globally competitive.
When he said that if China will ''build me a train around Mindanao, build me train from Manila to Bicol... build me a train [going to] Batangas, for the six years that I'll be president, I'll shut up,” you suddenly forgot that you once said or believed that our country should put up a brave front against China, that if we cannot fight China with might, we will use the force of international law to counter its aggression. Because he said that our national sovereignty can be traded for trains even if China is not the exclusive source of funds for the building of these trains, you automatically jettison your nationalistic sentiments the moment he said those words about trains and China.
Here’s a tip on how you can be a Duterte supporter and a concerned, reasonable Filipino citizen at the same time: always make not voting for him an option, always threaten him with it. Don’t adopt the stubborn stance that no amount of rape jokes, gay bashing, poor educational policy, unconstitutional or unnationalistic foreign policy, and open advocacy for extrajudicial killings can ever make you change your vote. Call him out when he insults your intelligence every time he repeats that promise that he will either stop or suppress crimes in three to six months. Shame him every time he insinuates he’s going to kill suspects without due process of law. It is never ever going to be acceptable. And you should never ever tire of chastising him for it. You should not make excuses for him the way he does not make excuses for suspects, never mind that criminality is a far more complex problem than how he paints it to be.
Based on his TV ad where he claims that he needs Senator Cayetano as his VP to correct him, you will be doing your man a great favor if you indeed tell him that what he’s doing is downright wrong.
As a voter, you should hold power over him. Don’t profess unconditional love for him; hold him to higher standards. Always threaten him with a non-vote no matter how he feigns he is unfazed by it. Your support for him must not be cast in stone. It must be subject to your remaining non-negotiables. Stop treating him as a messiah whose words are like gospel truths that must either be believed in or tolerated.
The journey to the voting precints come May 9 is as important, if not more important, than the name of the candidate for whom we will cast our precious votes. Let us not sacrifice the values we want our children to have or the things that we stood for, just because one man was so right, arguably, when he identified fighting crimes as a paramount national issue and capitalized on it, and he was also so right, again arguably, when he diagnosed the Mindanao problem and proposed solutions for it.
When you keep your silence in the face of indignities, it’s not just about the man anymore but also about what kind of person you have become.
Your man may win and become president but in the process you have lost.
In making him a winner you have made yourself a loser.
x x x."
Posted by Atty. Manuel J. Laserna Jr. at 5:42 AM
How to defeat America AND CHINA AND CONTAIN RUSSIA and to give to planet Earth a chance:
How the Afghan Army Collapsed Under the Taliban’s Pressure
Despite having larger numbers and better equipment than the Taliban, Afghan forces were never strong enough to sustain government control in the absence of U.S. firepower.
A reporter asked U.S. President Joe Biden in July whether a Taliban takeover of Afghanistan was inevitable. “No, it is not,” he said, pointing to the presence of three hundred thousand “well-equipped” Afghan security personnel.
More From Our Experts
Little more than a month later, the Afghan military completely collapsed. It lost control of much of the country, often without putting up a fight, and allowed the Taliban to take over. Near the end, provincial capitals fell with dizzying rapidity. On August 15, Taliban fighters marched into Kabul.
More on:
How did the $83 billion U.S. effort to train and equip the Afghan military go so wrong? Why didn’t the Afghan military fight harder to stop the Taliban?
Fatally Demoralized
The answer could be found in Napoleon Bonaparte’s maxim: “In war, the moral is to the physical as ten is to one.” Quite simply, an Afghan military that over the past twenty years had learned to rely on U.S. support for airpower, intelligence, logistics, planning, and other vital enablers was fatally demoralized by the U.S. decision to abandon it. An Afghan special forces officer told the Washington Post that many Afghans saw the troop withdrawal deal that the Donald Trump administration signed with the Taliban in February 2020 as “the end” and that the United States “left [the Afghan military] to fail.” As a result, he said, “Everyone was just looking out for himself.”
It’s possible that Afghan President Ashraf Ghani thought his government would receive a reprieve from President Biden. But in April, Biden announced that the remaining three thousand U.S. troops in Afghanistan would be withdrawn by September 11, 2021. Not only did those troops depart, but so did eight thousand allied troops and eighteen thousand contractors that the Afghan forces relied upon to operate their air force and for logistical support. In recent months, the Afghan military was unable to provide vital supplies such as food and ammunition to outposts scattered around the country. Some Afghan units, particularly the elite commandos, fought hard nearly to the end. But seeing the writing on the wall, most troops chose to cut deals with the Taliban, surrender, or simply melt away rather than risk their lives for a hopeless cause.
U.S. Military Mistakes
The fall of Afghanistan rightly raises serious questions about the mistakes the United States made during its twenty-year effort to train the Afghan military. The U.S. armed forces will need to process lessons learned, and there will need to be a great deal of critical self-examination. The U.S. training effort had many shortcomings, such as deficiencies in language and cultural knowledge and lack of expertise in training police rather than soldiers, which hurt local-level security. In addition, the U.S. effort concentrated too much on teaching tactical infantry skills while neglecting the kind of higher-level expertise in logistics, planning, training, and command and control that is needed to maintain a military force.
The U.S. training effort was also hindered by factors beyond its control, including the lack of education in one of the world’s poorest countries and the pervasiveness of corruption. As a police officer in Kandahar recently told the New York Times, “We are drowning in corruption.”
All of that corruption meant Afghan troop numbers, such as the one cited by Biden, were vastly exaggerated. The Washington Post’s Afghanistan Papers project found that of the 352,000 soldiers and police counted as members of the country’s security forces, only 254,000 could be confirmed by the Afghan government. Commanders not only created “ghost soldiers” to pad their payrolls but also skimmed the pay of serving soldiers and failed to deliver necessary supplies, the Post reported. To a large extent, that corruption was enabled by the United States’ free-spending ways. U.S. attempts to fight corruption were, by contrast, half-hearted and ineffectual.
Who’s to Blame?
Many now criticize the U.S. military for building an Afghan force in its own image—heavily reliant on airpower and technology that the Afghans could not maintain by themselves. The criticism has some validity, but there is a logic to the U.S. approach: The Afghan forces were far too small to defend a far-flung nation of thirty-eight million people, and no U.S. administration wanted to fund a larger force. There was no way to maintain a security-force presence across such a vast country without supplying outposts by air. Once U.S. troops and contractors abruptly pulled out, the Afghans simply lost the ability to keep their military machine functioning, and the military disintegrated.
Although it’s easy to blame Afghan troops for not fighting harder, it’s important to remember that more than sixty thousand Afghan security-force members were killed in the past twenty years—that’s twenty-seven times more than U.S. fatalities in the war. While some three thousand U.S. advisors remained in the country, the Afghan military still controlled every city. It was the U.S. pullout that brutally exposed the shortcomings of the Afghan forces and precipitated the military’s collapse.
There is no US military anymore, it stopped existing already several decades ago. What there are are chunks and wracks of it out of control, both civilian and military. This is WHY THE ROW MUST INVADE THE US AND PUT AND END TO IT. OTHERWISE LIFE WILL END ON THIS PLANET.
After USA TODAY investigation, military finally releases internal extremism report
Will CarlessUSA TODAY
More than a year and a half after it was completed, the Department of Defense has finally published a report about extremism in the ranks.
The report was commissioned by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin in April 2021 as one of four “immediate actions” announced in the wake of the Jan. 6 insurrection. Dozens of current and former members of the military have since been charged with Jan. 6-related crimes.
Earlier this year, a USA TODAY investigation found that the military had little progress to show on its efforts to combat extremism and that many important initiatives appeared to be stalled or incomplete.
One such effort was that “Study on Extremist Activity within the Total Force.” The study had been completed by the Institute for Defense Analyses in June 2022, USA TODAY first reported, but had never been released.
On Tuesday, in response to renewed requests to the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, that report was provided to USA TODAY for the first time.
Its 262 pages will be subject to further expert examination and review, but the report offers some quick insight into what the analysis did – and did not – find.
The report offers scant new data on extremism in the military
Experts on extremism had been waiting for this report, hoping it would shed new light on how bad the military’s extremism problem is. The report’s primary focus was to gain “greater fidelity on the scope of the problem,” according to Austin’s memo in April 2021.
“I just want good data − small, big, minute, whatever, so that we can address the problem,” Heidi Beirich, co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, told USA TODAY earlier this year.
But the report appears to offer almost nothing in terms of new data on the scope of the military’s extremism problem. Instead, it collates existing data from sources including the military’s inspector general.
The authors of the report did research court martial judgments to search for data on extremists and found 10 such cases. But they acknowledged court martials represent only a tiny sliver of extremists – because most cases don’t end in a court martial.
“Nearly all of these cases were addressed through administrative action, non-judicial punishment, or referral to command for appropriate action,” the report notes.
Researchers from the Institute for Defense Analyses did not respond to requests for comment Tuesday.
Investigation:After Jan. 6 riot, hundreds of identifiable people remain free. FBI arrests could take years
The report says extremism appears to be becoming more common in the military
The report concludes that extremism in the military is rare but dangerous.
“The participation in violent extremist activities of even a small number of individuals with military connections and military training could present a risk to the military and to the country as a whole,” it says.
The researchers used publicly available data on extremism, including the Profiles of Individual Radicalization in the United States (PIRUS) database maintained by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) at the University of Maryland.
The Defense Department report makes the same conclusion START researchers have made: “Participation rates for former service members appear to be growing,” it says.
More:Military told FBI of Capitol riot suspect after Jan. 6 attack. He remained free for years
The military’s security clearance process doesn’t take domestic extremism into account
The report says the military’s process for giving security clearances to military and civilian personnel is outdated and inadequate.
“DOD’s processes for awarding security clearances, assessing suitability, and granting access to facilities still focus to a significant extent on Cold War threats and threats related to the Global War on Terrorism rather than the threat of home-grown extremism.”
The researchers recommended updating and standardizing security and suitability questions across the military to ask directly about prohibited extremist activities.
Military security clearances have been much discussed this year after Air National Guard member Jack Teixeira was arrested and charged with posting hundreds of classified documents on a Discord server.
In addition to Teixeira, three active-duty Marines were charged for their suspected role in the Capitol riot in January. All three Marines worked in intelligence. One was assigned to the National Security Agency headquarters.
Without updating the security clearance process, “the Department remains at risk of unknowingly permitting persons who may have engaged in violent extremist conduct to enter and encumber privileged positions as civilian employees or contractors in the military community,” the report concludes.
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)
-
World Economic Forum Deletes Sri Lankan PM Article Boasting Of Plan to Make Country ‘Rich by 2025’ Comes after Sri Lankan people ove...
-
Ex-president of Poland Lech Walesa proposed to “dismember” Russia by admi...
-
Usury From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Of Usury, from Brant's Stultifera Navis ( Ship of Fo...
