Fauci oggi

 

Fauci says he would be ‘astounded’ if Pfizer, Moderna and J&J Covid vaccines don’t get full FDA approval

Key Points
  • Dr. Anthony Fauci told CNBC on Tuesday he expects U.S. drug regulators to eventually grant full approval to Pfizer, Moderna and J&J’s Covid vaccines.
  • “The data are about as good as it gets,” the White House chief medical advisor said.
  • All three Covid vaccines are currently being distributed under emergency use authorizations.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, delivers remarks during a press briefing with Press Secretary Jen Psaki at the White House in Washington, U.S., April 13, 2021.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, delivers remarks during a press briefing with Press Secretary Jen Psaki at the White House in Washington, U.S., April 13, 2021.
Tom Brenner | Reuters
VIDEO05:05
Dr. Anthony Fauci on the need for Covid boosters, vaccination push

White House chief medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci fully expects the coronavirus vaccines from Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson will receive full approval from U.S. drug regulators, he told CNBC on Tuesday.

“The data are about as good as it gets. ... I would be astounded if these vaccines, namely the mRNA and the J&J, didn’t get full approval,” Fauci said on “Squawk Box.”

All three Covid vaccines are currently authorized for distribution in the U.S. on an emergency basis, but none of them have received full approval from the Food and Drug Administration yet. Full approval would allow the drugmakers to market the shots directly to consumers and give employers more flexibility in mandating them.

Pfizer and Moderna’s two-dose vaccines use mRNA technology, while J&J’s single-shot vaccine uses an adenovirus.

More than 184 million people in the U.S., or 55.5% of the population, are at least partially inoculated against Covid, according to CDC data. Nearly 160 million people, or 48% of the population, are fully vaccinated.

The pace of vaccinations in the U.S. has slowed since the spring, even as concern about highly transmissible variants grows. Some people have argued that full approval of the vaccines would convince Americans on the fence to get the shots and give businesses more confidence to implement vaccine mandates.

“Even though we are still under an emergency use authorization, it’s a bit different than other emergency use authorizations, which usually are granted with not nearly as much positive data as we have for these products,” Fauci said. 

Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech were the first vaccine makers to file for full approval, in May, followed by Moderna on June 1. Both vaccines were cleared for limited use in December.

“The efficacy or the effectiveness in the real world is unquestioned, so we’re going to get a full approval,” he added. “The question is, it’s just going to take a little bit more time.” 

Fauci’s appearance on CNBC comes one day after U.S. health officials, including Fauci, met with representatives from vaccine maker Pfizer to discuss the potential need for Covid booster shots.

Pfizer has said it sees signs that immunity from its two-dose vaccine declines over time and intends to pursue authorization for a booster shot. The company also is developing a booster meant to combat the highly contagious delta variant.

The FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have publicly pushed back on Pfizer’s case for a third dose, releasing a joint statement last week that said people who are fully vaccinated do not need a supplemental shot right now.

Fauci described Monday’s talk with Pfizer has mostly “a courtesy meeting.” However, he emphasized that the discussion around booster shots “has absolutely nothing to do with the effectiveness of the vaccine.”

“These vaccines are highly, highly effective both in the clinical trial and in the real-world effectiveness studies. Let me give you a cogent example: 99.5% of people who die of Covid are unvaccinated. Only 0.5% of those who die are vaccinated,” said Fauci, the longtime head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

He said the real question is how long protection lasts and at what level of protection.

“Does it wane off and if so, how soon? And if you do do a boost, how high do you get the response up? Those were all discussed but … there was nothing that came even close to any decision,” he said.

VIDEO04:56
Fauci: Covid booster relates to durability, not vaccine effectiveness

Fauci ieri

 

Fauci says COVID-19 vaccine boosters not needed for now, with delta variant mostly infecting the unvaccinated

WHO official criticizes Euro 2020 final at crowded Wembley Stadium: ‘Am I supposed to be enjoying watching transmission happening in front of my eyes?’

A dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is administered in Haxby, England, near York.

lindsey parnaby/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a top medical adviser to President Joe Biden, did the round of Sunday talk shows on Sunday to say COVID-19 vaccine boosters are not needed in the U.S. right now as almost all new cases are in unvaccinated people, but he didn’t rule out that booster shots may be needed over time for certain individuals.

Fauci made the comments ahead of a meeting later Monday between Pfizer Inc. and the Food and Drug Administration to discuss boosters, which Pfizer has said it is already working on, including one aimed specifically at the delta variant of COVID-19, which has become the dominant strain in the U.S. and much of the rest of the world.

Fauci spoke as Israel’s health ministry said it would offer boosters to individuals who are immunocompromised and have already had two shots of the vaccine developed by Pfizer PFE, +0.65% with German partner BioNTech BNTX, +4.70%. Israel, an early vaccine success story in rapidly getting shots into the arms of its citizens, is struggling with a fresh outbreak of cases, driven by the delta variant, which is far more transmissible than the original virus.

Fauci also sought to answer questions about the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s latest guidance for returning to school in the fall, which includes face masks, social distancing and improved ventilation.

“If you can’t implement them, you should still do everything you can with testing, with guidelines that would allow people, for example, in lunchrooms when you gather, when you’re sick don’t come to school, do everything you can to keep the in-person classes going,” he told the ABC program “This Week.”

See: Vaccinated teachers and students don’t need to wear masks, CDC says in new school guidance

Fauci also lamented the sight of conservatives cheering for low vaccination rates, blaming “ideological rigidity” for hobbling the fight against COVID-19.

Speaking Sunday on CNN, Fauci referenced a widely shared video of “COVID contrarian” Alex Berenson speaking Saturday at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Texas, where he drew cheers when mentioning how the U.S. government has failed to meet its nationwide vaccination goals.

“It’s horrifying. I mean, they are cheering about someone saying it’s a good thing for people not to try and save their lives,” he said. “I just don’t get it.

“I think there’s no reason not to get vaccinated. Why are we having red states and places in the South that are very highly ideological in one way, not wanting to get vaccinations? Vaccinations have nothing to do with politics,” he said.

The CDC’s vaccine tracker is showing that 159 million Americans are fully vaccinated, equal to 48% of the total population. That means they have had two shots of the Pfizer or Moderna MRNA, +10.30% vaccine, or one shot of Johnson & Johnson’s JNJ, -0.16% one-dose regimen. The AstraZeneca AZN, -0.30% AZN, -0.07% vaccine has not been authorized for use in the U.S.

Among adults 18 and older, 58.8% are fully vaccinated, while 67.6% have received at least one dose, having narrowly missed Biden’s goal, set two months earlier, of having 70% of adults at least partially inoculated by July 4.

Vaccination rates vary widely from state to state, however, with several states, mostly in the South, reporting less than 40% of their populations inoculated, including Mississippi, Arkansas and Louisiana. CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky noted last week that 99% of COVID-19 related deaths in June were among people who were unvaccinated.

Source: Johns Hopkins University

New COVID cases are on the rise in the U.S., averaging 19,302 on Sunday, according to a New York Times tracker, up 60% from the average two weeks ago. And while deaths are still falling, hospitalizations are up 11% from two weeks ago, thanks to such localized outbreaks in states with low vaccination rates.

Elsewhere, the delta variant continues to create havoc in many Asian cities, including Seoul, Hanoi, Bangkok and cities in Indonesia, the Guardian reported.

The WHO-backed Covax program, which aims to get vaccine supply to lower-income countries, will take delivery of more than 100 million doses of the vaccines developed by Chinese companies Sinovac and Sinopharm, said the paper.

In Taiwan, Terry Gou, the billionaire founder of Taiwan’s Foxconn 2354, -0.30% as well as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., has negotiated a deal to secure 10 million COVID-19 vaccine doses for Taiwan, which has complained that Chinese interference is preventing it from accessing supply, Reuters reported.

A senior official at the World Health Organization fretted online about the crowds gathered closely in Wembley Stadium for last night’s Euro 2020 soccer tournament final between England and Italy, as she watched unmasked fans singing together and shouting for their teams.

Epidemiologist Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO’s COVID-19 technical lead, described “watching transmission happening in front of my eyes” as around 60,000 fans piled into the stadium.

See now: Heartbreak for England: Italy wins Euro title on penalty kicks

Latest tallies

The global tally for the coronavirus-borne illness climbed to 186.9 million on Monday, while the death toll climbed further above 4.03 million, according to data aggregated by Johns Hopkins University.

The U.S. leads the world with a total of 33.85 million cases and in deaths with 607,178.

India is closing in on the U.S. in cases at 30.87 million but is third in deaths at 408,764, while Brazil is second in deaths at 533,488 and is third in cases at 19 million.

Mexico has fourth highest death toll at 234,969 but is 15th in cases with 2.6 million.

In Europe, Russia leads in deaths with 141,335 fatalities, while the U.K. has had 128,691, making Russia the country with the fifth highest death toll in the world and highest in Europe.

China, where the virus was first discovered late in 2019, has had 104,072 confirmed cases and 4,848 deaths, according to its official numbers, which are widely held to be massively underreported.

L'EPICENTRO DALLA QUARTA GUERRA MONDIALE E' NELLE FILIPPINE

 

US warns China it stands behind South China Sea ruling and is committed to Philippine defense

Blinken made the comments Sunday, in a statement marking the fifth anniversary of a ruling by an independent arbitration tribunal rejecting China's expansive territorial claims over the waterway, siding with the Philippines.
Tensions in the South China Sea, which is also contested by Brunei, Malaysia, Taiwan and Vietnam have ratcheted up this year, with Manila accusing Beijing of trying to intimidate its coast guard vessels, as well as sending its so called "maritime militia" to crowd out Philippine fishing boats.
The US' top diplomat said the US could invoke the US-Philippine mutual defense pact in the event of any Chinese military action against Philippine assets in the region.
"We also reaffirm that an armed attack on Philippine armed forces, public vessels, or aircraft in the South China Sea would invoke US mutual defense commitments under Article IV of the 1951 US-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty," Blinken said.
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.
Blinken also called on the Chinese government to "abide by its obligations under international law (and) cease its provocative behavior" in the South China Sea.
The 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at the Hague dismissed China's claims to the South China Sea outright, while making clear that China was infringing on Philippine sovereignty through activities such as island-building in Manila's exclusive economic zone (EEZ).
Beijing has disavowed the tribunal ruling and continued to build up and militarily reinforce its positions in the South China Sea. It claims the US and other countries are increasing tensions in the region by sending their warships there in violation of its sovereignty.
Washington counters that its naval presence in the South China Sea supports freedom of navigation under international maritime law.
Underscoring the US stance, the guided-missile destroyer USS Benfold performed a freedom on navigation operation (FONOP) near the Paracel Islands in the northwestern part of the South China Sea on Monday, the US Navy's 7th Fleet said in a statement.
This islands, referred to as the Xisha chain in China, are also claimed by Vietnam and Taiwan, but China has controlled them since the 1970s.
US Navy spokesperson Lt. Mark Langford said Monday's operation challenged the claims by all three parties.
The guided-missile destroyer USS Benfold steams through the South China Sea on Monday, July 12.
"This freedom of navigation operation ... upheld the rights, freedoms, and lawful uses of the sea recognized in international law by challenging the unlawful restrictions on innocent passage imposed by China, Taiwan, and Vietnam and also by challenging China's claim to strait baselines enclosing the Paracel Islands," Langford said.
China said it put forces in place to "warn and drive away" the US destroyer, which it said violated its sovereignty.
"This is another ironclad evidence of the US' aggressive navigational hegemony and militarization of the South China Sea," PLA Air Force Col. Tian Junli, spokesperson for the PLA's Southern Theater Command, said in a statement after Monday's US FONOP.
"Facts show that the United States is an out-and-out 'South China Sea security risk maker,'" Tian said.
In his statement Sunday, Blinken called on China to "take steps to reassure the international community that it is committed to the rules-based maritime order that respects the rights of all countries, big and small."
"Nowhere is the rules-based maritime order under greater threat than in the South China Sea. The People's Republic of China (PRC) continues to coerce and intimidate Southeast Asian coastal states, threatening freedom of navigation in this critical global throughway," the US secretary of state said, referring to China by its official name.
He called on China to "take steps to reassure the international community that it is committed to the rules-based maritime order that respects the rights of all countries, big and small."
Blinken said the US stands behind the 2016 ruling against China, as reiterated last year by then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who said at the time that "Beijing's claims to offshore resources across most of the South China Sea are completely unlawful, as is its campaign of bullying to control them."
In response to Pompeo's comments, the Chinese Embassy in Washington accused the US of "distorting" international law and "exaggerating" the situation in order to "sow discord.

IN SUDAFRICA I RIBELLI LA SPUNTANO SULLE FORZE ARMATE

 

Chaos in South Africa as rioters defy security forces

Il 62% dei vaccinati rischia di morire per microcoaguli di sangue creati dai vaccini stessi

 

ALERT: Doctor says mRNA vaccines “will kill most people” through heart failure, 62% of vaccinated people already show microscopic blood clots


Bypass censorship by sharing this link:
New
Image: ALERT: Doctor says mRNA vaccines “will kill most people” through heart failure, 62% of vaccinated people already show microscopic blood clots

(Natural News) The vast majority of people who are getting injected for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) will die within a few short years from heart failure, warns Dr. Charles Hoffe, M.D., a medical practitioner in British Columbia, Canada.

In one of his latest updates, Dr. Hoffe explains that he is observing in his patients who took an mRNA (messenger RNA) “vaccine” from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna that their capillaries are now plugging up, which he says will eventually lead to a serious cardiovascular event.

Chinese Virus mRNA shots are programmed to turn a person’s body into a spike protein “factory,” and Dr. Hoffe says that over time these mass-produced spike proteins cause progressive blood clotting.

No fewer than 60 percent of people who take an mRNA injection will suffer from these blood clots – and in the end, an overwhelming majority will end up six feet under due to the damage caused.

“We now know that only 25 percent of the ‘vaccine’ injected into a person’s arm actually stays in your arm,” Dr. Hoffe explains one his blog.

“The other 75 percent is collected by your lymphatic system and literally fed into your circulation so these little packages of messenger RNA, and by the way in a single dose of Moderna ‘vaccine’ there are literally 40 trillion mRNA molecules.”

Dr. Hoffe says that while these packages were designed by Big Pharma to be absorbed directly into people’s cells, the only place they can actually be absorbed is around the blood vessels and into capillary networks, which are the tiniest blood vessels where blood flow is slow and where genes are released.

“Your body then gets to work reading and then manufacturing trillions and trillions of these spike proteins,” he says.

“Each gene can produce many, many spike proteins. The body then recognizes these are foreign bodies so it makes antibodies against it so you are then protected against COVID. That’s the idea.”

mRNA injections insert “spiky bits” into blood vessels, eventually causing heart failure

Though the claim has long been that these spike proteins act as a deterrent to viral infection after being injected into a person’s body, the reality is that they actually become part of the cell wall of a person’s vascular endothelium.

“This means that these cells which line your blood vessels, which are supposed to be smooth so that your blood flows smoothly now have these little spikey bits sticking out,” explains Principia Scientific.

Dr. Hoffe says it is an inevitability that the injected will develop blood clots because as the vaccine-inserted spike proteins embed themselves within blood vessels and capillaries, blood platelets circulate around trying to fix the problem by creating increasingly more clots.

“So, when the platelet comes through the capillary it suddenly hits all these COVID spikes and it becomes absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form to block that vessel,” he writes.

“Therefore, these spike proteins can predictably cause blood clots. They are in your blood vessels (if mRNA ‘vaccinated’) so it is guaranteed.”

It turns out that these blood clots are different than the “rare” ones spoken about on the media that show up on CT scans and MRIs. These are microscopic and do not show up on tests, as they can only be detected using a blood test known as D-dimer.

Dr. Hoffe has been performing D-dimer tests on his mRNA “vaccinated” patients, which led him to discover that at least 62 percent of them have these microscopic blood clots.

“The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot [regenerate],” he says. “When those tissues are damaged by blood clots, they are permanently damaged.”

To learn more about the dangers and ineffectiveness of Chinese Virus injections, be sure to check out ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

Principia-Scientific.com

NaturalNews.com

Una 'democrazia' di assassini pontifica al mondo su come prendere i vaccini

Daniel Hale exposed the widespread murder of civilians in the drone war. But do Americans really want to know?
By Chris Hedges
Published July 13, 2021 5:00AM (EDT)
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Drone Attack (Getty Images/koto_feja)

Chris Hedges is the former Middle East bureau chief of the New York Times, a Pulitzer Prize winner, and a columnist at Scheerpost. He is the author of several books, including "America: The Farewell Tour," "American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America" and "War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning."

L'EPICENTRO DELLA QUARTA GUERRA MONDIALE E' NELLE FILIPPINE

 |South China Sea

Is Duterte squandering The Hague victory to appease Beijing?

Experts say China’s gains in South China Sea ‘impossible’ to reverse while urging the Philippines to boost military capability and alliances.

Chinese President Xi Jinping greets his Philippine counterpart Rodrigo Duterte during the latter's visit to Beijing in 2019 [File: Kenzaburo Fukuhara/AFP]
Chinese President Xi Jinping greets his Philippine counterpart Rodrigo Duterte during the latter's visit to Beijing in 2019 [File: Kenzaburo Fukuhara/AFP]

“The Philippines is proud to have contributed to the international rules-based order,” he said of Manila’s role in challenging Beijing before the Permanent Court of Arbitration.

In a dig at China, Locsin said that the decision “dashed among others a nine-dash line; and any expectation that possession is nine-tenths of the law.”

Locsin then cited Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte’s videotaped message at the UN General Assembly, in which the Filipino leader said the case was now “beyond compromise and beyond the reach of passing governments to dilute, diminish or abandon”.

But since taking office in 2016, Duterte has usually been less assertive – failing to challenge China’s moves to expand its maritime dominance in the region despite the landmark victory – and foreign policy experts said his “defeatist rhetoric” has compromised the country’s integrity and diminished its legal standing.

In May, Duterte said during a televised address that the ruling means “nothing” in the real world.

“Son of a b****. That’s just a piece of paper. I will just throw that away in the wastebasket,” the president said.

“Manila certainly missed a chance to echo a consistent unified narrative on its claims … which Beijing saw as an opportunity to flex its muscles and build the largest coast guard and maritime militia for its strategic advantage,” said Chester Cabalza, president and founder of Manila-based think-tank International Development and Security Cooperation.

“Instead, Filipinos heard defeatist rhetoric from the commander-in-chief as he kept mum on continuous Chinese incursions into the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone (EEZ),” he told Al Jazeera.

Collin Koh, research fellow at Singapore’s Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, said the Duterte administration “squandered the opportunity” in emphasising the significance of the decision “whether it ought to be doing it alone or in concert with like-minded external parties” such as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the United States.

‘Victory Day’

It was in July 2016, less than two weeks into the Duterte presidency when The Hague tribunal concluded, based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), that China’s assertion of historic rights within its “nine-dash line” and maritime entitlements over most of the South China Sea had “no legal basis”.

The ruling also affirmed the Philippines’ jurisdiction over its exclusive economic zone (EEZ), which stretches 200 nautical miles (370km) from its coast. As such, China’s fishing activities and construction of artificial islands within that area were deemed an infringement of Philippine sovereign rights. The Philippines refers to that particular area as the West Philippine Sea.

Moreover, the court ruled that of all disputed South China Sea features – even those controlled by Beijing – none were considered “habitable” and able to sustain economic activity in its original form, and therefore were not entitled to an EEZ – thus clearly falling within Philippine EEZ.

Protesters descend on the Chinese consulate in Manila in 2019 to oppose the Asian superpower’s growing sway in the Philippines, and as tensions rise over Beijing’s presence in the disputed South China sea [File: Ted Aljibe/AFP]

To commemorate the ruling this year, Philippine Senator Risa Hontiveros has proposed that the country declare July 12 as the National West Philippine Sea Victory Day.

In a statement sent to Al Jazeera, she said Duterte’s predecessor, Benigno Aquino III – who died last month – should also be commended for his decision to take on China and secure a “landmark legal victory”.

“Even when the Philippines was going against the Goliath that is China, he pursued the case merely on the principle that it was the right thing to do.”

Protests are also expected on Monday outside China’s diplomatic mission in Manila.

China has said repeatedly that it does not recognise the 2016 ruling, and has continued to expand its artificial islands in Mischief Reef, as well as in Scarborough Shoal, which Manila lost to Beijing in 2012.

On Monday, Chinese Foreign Ministry Zhao Lijian described the ruling as “nothing more than a piece of waste paper” and that it is “illegal, null, and void.”

Duterte’s gambit

Campaigning for the presidency in 2016, Duterte charmed voters with his hardline stance on China. In one campaign swing, he promised to ride a jet ski in the South China Sea and challenge the Chinese incursion in Philippine waters. He said he always wanted to die a hero.

But as soon as he became president, Duterte started to backpedal on his promises, saying the Philippines cannot afford to take on China because a confrontation would only lead to bloodshed.

In a Talk to Al Jazeera interview in October 2016, Duterte also said that his jet ski remark was a “hyperbole” and that he did not even know how to swim. He later said it was all “a joke” to show his “bravado”, and that only “stupid” people would believe it.

In a stunning admission in June 2019, Duterte said he had reached a verbal agreement with Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2016 allowing China to fish within the Philippines’s EEZ, despite a constitutional mandate that the state must protect its marine wealth, including its EEZ, and “reserve its use and enjoyment exclusively to Filipino citizens”.

In recent months, Chinese vessels, believed to be manned by Chinese maritime militia personnel, were seen in the South China Sea within the Philippines’ EEZ [File: Philippine Coast Guard/Handout via Reuters]

“It was a mutual agreement,” Duterte explained. “Let’s give way to each other. You fish there, I fish here.”

In several public remarks, Duterte has emphasised that better relations with China have brought economic dividends to the Philippines, through direct investments, financial assistance and loans.

Salvador Panelo, who was Duterte’s spokesman at the time, defended the deal saying that while it was “verbal” it was still “valid and binding”.

But Panelo’s replacement, Harry Roque, said this April that there was “no truth” to the deal and that it was “quite simply conjecture”.

“No such treaty or agreement exists between the Philippines and China,” Roque said, explaining that even a fishing agreement “can only be done through a treaty” and in “written form”.

‘Swarming’

Amid the Duterte administration’s diplomatic dithering, the situation in the South China Sea came to a head earlier this year, when several reports revealed that hundreds of Chinese vessels had gathered within the Philippine EEZ.

The “swarming incident” has since been repeated several times, prompting several diplomatic protests by Manila, which denounced Beijing’s “blatant disregard” of its commitment “to promote peace and stability in the region”.

In May, the presence of hundreds of Chinese vessels so exasperated Locsin, the Philippines’ top diplomat, that he fired an expletive-laden statement on social media.

“China, my friend, how politely can I put it? Let me see… O… GET THE F*** OUT,” Locsin wrote on Twitter.

According to reports, Manila has filed more than 120 diplomatic protests with China over incidents in the disputed waters since 2016.

Still, Duterte has remained reluctant to confront China.

In recent months, he has said that he wants to maintain friendly ties with China, citing Manila’s “debt of gratitude” for Beijing’s help in providing coronavirus vaccines. He has also banned his Cabinet from speaking about the South China Sea, after key security and diplomatic officials criticised China for the swarming.

But despite Duterte’s efforts to cosy up to Beijing, observers say China has only been further “emboldened”, and the growing tension has now left Manila with no choice but to step up its action to assert its rightful place in the South China Sea.

Cabalza, the security analyst based in Manila, said that now is not the time for the Duterte administration to be “flip-flopping on foreign policy”, urging a “more strategic” approach that balances the country’s economic and security interests.

“China’s art of war and deception should not be taken for granted.”

He urged the Philippines to “fast-track” its military modernisation programme “to increase its presence in the aerial and maritime domains” and halt the Chinese incursions.

“If Manila seriously considers balanced and fearless engagement with Beijing, it needs to capacitate on strengthening a robust national security infrastructure that deals with China’s grey zone strategy and massive disinformation,” he said, adding that Manila should also continue filing diplomatic protests every time an incursion happens.

South China Sea ‘fait accompli’

Koh, the foreign affairs analyst from Singapore’s S Rajaratnam School of International Studies, also noted how the Philippines has lagged over the years in “building up the stick” in terms of military capacity to carry out “more vigorously” maritime patrols within its EEZ.

That could have been partly addressed by Manila if Duterte had not gone out of his way to gradually undermine its decades-long alliance with the US, Koh said. Since the beginning of his presidency, Duterte has shown his disdain towards the US, even making the unsubstantiated claim that he could be a target of the CIA.

 

“The open expression of desire to prioritise ties with Beijing – even at the expense of the 2016 award, the lack of political will to maintain persistent maritime presence and the alliance relationship with the US would have had the combined effect of emboldening Beijing,” he explained to Al Jazeera.

With the progress China made in fortifying its artificial islands in the South China Sea, it will be “impossible to even envisage” that it would “willingly relinquish those possessions” within the Philippines’ EEZ, Koh said.

“There’s no way to reverse the fait accompli short of evicting the Chinese from those artificial outposts by use of force, which would mean war.”

Without resorting to armed conflict, it is still possible for the Philippines to assert its maritime sovereignty and rights by putting “a principled and consistent stance” on the issue, Koh added.

He says the Philippines should pursue daily maritime law enforcement actions and patrols of its EEZ.

“The recent Philippine Coast Guard challenge and dispersal of Chinese and other foreign fishing vessels in the Philippine EEZ, around Sabina Shoal and Marie Louise Bank, is a good example,” Koh said.

“These actions may not compel China to reverse its acts in the South China Sea, but at the very least may help deter Beijing from thinking of more drastic actions to further undermine the status quo.”

In May, Chinese vessels also left Sabina Shoal, after the Philippines issued a radio challenge.

Hontiveros, an opposition senator and critic of Duterte’s South China Sea policy said the radio challenges showed that “the Philippines can assert our ownership of the West Philippine Sea without resorting to war.”

As a middle power caught in the increasingly heated rivalry between China and the US, the lesson for Manila is to pursue an independent foreign policy, according to Cabalza, the foreign affairs expert who has also studied at the National Defence University in Beijing.

“Manila should choose its own national interest. It takes courage to depend on its own capability and build it with a vision to protect the country’s own sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

La censura si estendera' dai social media anche ai cellulari

 

Dan Bongino on COVID censorship spreading from social media to text messages

Host calls growing censorship practices 'totalitarian'

Dan Bongino, the host of "The Dan Bongino Show" reacted to a new Politico report that the Biden administration plans to monitor vaccine misinformation in text messages.  

DAN BONGINO: Again, it started with your social media. It evolved into other things. It's now evolving frighteningly into your text messages too. Oh my gosh, conspiracy theory. Folks, it's an article in Politico. They're as far left is Lenin. It's not an article in Conservative Review or Breitbart who happened to be reputable outlets, by the way. It's in a left-leaning outlet. The White House, quote, is deciding to hit back harder on misinformation and scare tactics after Republican lawmakers and conservatives pledged to fight the administration's stated plans to go door to door to increase vaccination rates.

This is incredible. Tell me it's not. Tell me again how you're on the right side of history. So much so that if somebody puts out an alternate set of talking points, data points, and a set of facts on this show, you have to pull them off social media and attack their show. You're so comfortable with your ideas, you're completely unwilling to defend them. Do liberals not grasp how totalitarian this is?

MUOIONO CINQUE MILIONI DI PERSONE L'ANNO (su 7-8 MILIARDI) PER CAMBIAMENTI CLIMATICI E A NESSUNO VIENE L'IDEA DI CHIUDERE IL PIANETA

Abnormal Temperatures Account For 5 Million Deaths a Year, Scientists Say

13 JULY 2021

Abnormal hot and cold temperatures account for more than 5 million excess deaths a year across the world, according to a new study – the largest of its kind to date on the link between global climate and mortality rates.

The study looked at "non-optimal ambient temperatures", referring to exposure to abnormal hot and cold temperatures above and below an accepted range. These ranges and mortality rates were localized for each of the 750 locations around the globe studied to estimate additional deaths.

Mortality and temperature data was analyzed across the years 2000 to 2019, with global temperatures shifting upwards by an average of 0.26 degrees Celsius per decade across that time, and models used to extrapolate the figures.

"This is the first study to get a global overview of mortality due to non-optimal temperature conditions between 2000 and 2019, the hottest period since the pre-Industrial era," says environmental epidemiologist Yuming Guo from Monash University in Australia.

"Importantly, we used 43 countries' baseline data across five continents with different climates, socioeconomic and demographic conditions, and differing levels of infrastructure and public health services – so the study had a large and varied sample size, unlike previous studies."

The statistics from the study make for grim reading, with 9.43 percent of global deaths attributed to cold and hot temperatures. A previous study using a less comprehensive dataset put that figure at 7.71 percent.

Right now, around 9 out of 10 of these excess deaths are due to the cold, but that will change as the planet warms up – and we also know global warming leads to spells of extreme cold as well as extreme heat.

Asia and Africa carried the heaviest burden of cold-related deaths, with 2.4 million and 1.18 million deaths respectively every year, on average.

When it comes to heat-related deaths, the highest figures came from Asia with 224,000, and Europe with 178,700. Europe was the only continent where deaths linked to both cold and heat were higher than the global average.

Overall, climate-related mortality went down over the study period, but the trends are worrying. Deaths linked to the cold dropped 0.51 percent from 2000 to 2019, while deaths related to the heat rose 0.21 percent.

"In the long-term climate change is expected to increase the mortality burden because hot-related mortality would be continuing to increase," says Guo.

To put the statistics another way, we're talking about 74 excess deaths for every 100,000 people across the world. With deaths related to non-optimal temperatures currently one of the top 10 causes of mortality worldwide, this is already a major problem.

It's not just mortality rates that rising temperatures can affect. As the planet heats up we're going to see certain areas become inhospitable or useless for growing crops, while the animals we share Earth with are also under severe threat too.

On the positive side, having more data and better estimates on the impacts of climate change can only be helpful: by making significant changes across everything from government policies to individual behaviors, we might be able to get closer to whatever the best-case scenario looks like.

"Because of the inevitability of climate change, it is urgently important to provide a global view of the relevant mortality burden and to push and develop intergovernmental strategies against the health impacts of temperature events," the researchers write.

The research has been published in The Lancet Planetary Health.

Lettera aperta al signor Luigi di Maio, deputato del Popolo Italiano

MR PRES: IF YOU DO NOT TAKE DOWN THESE WALLS, YOU WILL BE TAKEN DOWN.

  WEF Davos 2025 – More Grotesque Than Ever. Robotizing and Depopulating. Peter Koenig By  Peter Koenig Global Research, March 09, 2025 Regi...