US-Philippines Military Alliance Could be Detrimental to the Philippines in the Outbreak of Taiwan Conflict

 

US-Philippines Military Alliance Could be Detrimental to the Philippines in the Outbreak of Taiwan Conflict

Theme:

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on InstagramTwitter and Facebook. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

The provocative visit of US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan on August 2, 2022 has caused major uproar not just from China but even from other peace-loving states. Pelosi’s visit has breached America’s One-China Policy, which formally acknowledges only one Chinese government and maintains the position of Taiwan being a breakaway region of China. Even prior to Pelosi’s visit, recent developments surrounding Taiwan have already escalated tensions between the two major powers and further soured their diplomatic relations. The trip occurs against the backdrop of express military agreement between the US and Taiwan, thereby sending a wrong signal to mainland China.

By ignoring China’s strong objections to Pelosi’s Taiwan visit, the US egregiously imperils regional stability and peace, and endangers an imminent outbreak of war between Taiwan and mainland China.

What are its implications for the Philippines, a small state that is 719.4 miles south of Taiwan?

Map of the Philippines in relation to Taiwan and China (Source: The Diplomatic Envoy, Seton Hall University via The Maritime Review)

US-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty

The southeast asian state pursued a flawed ‘independent foreign policy’ at the helm of former president Rodrigo Duterte, who threatened to abrogate the US-Philippines Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA), a component of the US-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT). The VFA is a mutual military agreement that allows US troops, under the provisions of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), “access to designated Philippine military facilities, the right to construct facilities, and preposition equipment, aircraft, and vessels, but rules out permanent basing.” The maverick leader flirted with the idea of cooperating with the Russian Armed Forces and China’s People’s Liberation Army, but reverted his decision and withdrew the termination of the VFA. This move came amid the increasing tension in the South China Sea, where the Philippines is a claimant state. 

Incumbent president Ferdinand Marcos Jr. vowed to continue Duterte’s foreign policy trajectory, iterating the slogan, “a friend to all, an enemy to none”. But it seems just another hot air as the country’s plans for US forces are back on track, including the building of facilities for US troops at five military bases — one in Palawan whose proximity to the South China Sea makes it conducive to conducting surveillance flights. Further, the Philippine navy begins to station at the Subic Bay Naval Base, which sits facing the South China Sea, with a view to “countering China’s increasing assertiveness in the contested waters“. The port authority head intimated the welcomed presence of the US navy as a balancing force against the formidable Chinese counterpart.

The crux of the US-Philippines joint military exercises and cooperation agreements is clear and definite: to counter China through the South China Sea crisis. Disaster relief, counterterrorism, etc. are just the tip of the iceberg. What is hidden from the Filipino public is the hegemon’s motive of encircling the emerging superpower — under the guise of a routine military exercise and training aimed at enriching military capabilities towards “maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific region“.

The Philippines in the event of a Taiwan-China conflict

The Philippines engages in economic and trade relations with Taiwan but maintains diplomatic relations only with mainland China. Amid the rising tension in the Taiwan Strait, the Philippine government released a brief but straightforward message, claiming adherence to the One-China Policy and the importance of diplomacy and dialogue.

Analysts lambasted the press release as “tiptoeing” around a major economic partner by “refusing to give any more comments”. “Tiptoe” is a misnomer with the ongoing US-Philippines military exercises — aimed at countering China — in the background. Having US troops and military equipment in the Philippine soil, the southeast asian state will become heavily embroiled in the event of a war outbreak between Taiwan and China, given America’s expression of military support to Taipei.

The volatility of the security architecture in the Indo-Pacific region should prompt a more open and honest dialogue and military diplomacy among the concerned states. The Philippines should limit, if not repeal, the provisions of the Mutual Defense Treaty with the US if it is serious in its commitment to an independent foreign policy.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Jezile Torculas has a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science.

The Filipino Family In Danger | Timothy Laws

 

Timothy Laws is a member of the Board of Advisers for the Alliance for the Family Foundation Philippines, which offers advice to its Board of Trustees. Popularly known as ALFI, it works to influence leaders and decision-makers in Philippine society by providing them with accurate and complete scientific information and education so they can foster and defend the sacredness of marriage, promote family solidarity, and protect human life in all its stages.

Timothy grew up in a small town in Pennsylvania.  He studied engineering in college, and after college, became a partner in a small businesses.  But he wanted to do something to help make the world a better place. At the time, hunger and starvation were one of the greatest injustices in the world. He volunteered with an NGO that works to enlist the resources of the U.S. to alleviate hunger both at home and abroad.  After a few years, Timothy met his wife through that work  — she was also a volunteer from the Philippines, who had come to the U.S. to study.  They fell in love and married within a year, and lived in Pennsylvania and later California.  In 1996 they moved to the Philippines.  “We’re still here,” Timothy says, “and we continue to try to make the world a better place in our own small way.  That’s what attracted me to my wife – in addition to her winning smile – in the first place.”

Readings & Resources

Clarifications & Corrections

  • from Mr. Laws: “Apologies, during the interview I stated that Prof. Pritchett’s paper showed that only 5% of the reduction in fertility was due to contraceptives, but I’m reminded by the paper that the actual figure is 10%.”

Action Items

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

ECCO IL PRIMO DEL GOBIERNO DEI COLONNELLI

 

Repubblica, Salvini fa la lista dei ministri “Cingolani, Figliuolo, Bertolaso…”

Sakvini e Figliuolo

Cingolani, Figliuolo o Bertolaso, un ambasciatore: la lista dei ministri di Salvini. La Lega vedrebbe bene Roberto Cingolani, ministro uscente della Transizione ecologica, in un eventuale governo della destra. “Cingolani – ha detto a Lampedusa Matteo Salvini – ha tutta la mia stima: si e’ fatto carico piu di una volta di usare il termine nucleare facendo arrabbiare Pd e Cinque Stelle; cosi’ come non si puo’ piu’ rinviare il Ponte sullo Stretto, non si puo’ piu rimanere tra i pochi grandi paesi al mondo che non producono energia nucleare di ultima generazione. Non credo che Cingolani – ha aggiunto – abbia tessere di partito in tasca, non e’ della Lega, ma se fosse a disposizione sarei felice”.

Leggi anche
Cingolani: “il pianeta è progettato per 3 miliardi di persone”
Vaccino Covid, Figliuolo si oppone alla pubblicazione del contratto tra Italia e Pfizer
Vaccino Covid, Bertolaso: “ritirare il green pass a chi non fa la terza dose”

Nella lista dei ministri, anche Figliuolo e Bertolaso

Secondo Repubblica, invece, “per gli Esteri invece nomi non ne fa: «ce ne sono due o tre, ma non vi dico chi sono o gli rovinate il fine settimana». Per tutti però il profilo è il medesimo: ambasciatori o ex, «abituati a parlare con tutti e di esperienza comprovata»”.

Repubblica prosegue la lista: “Nella lista esplicita dei desiderata, c’è posto anche «un commissario all’immigrazione, come un Figliuolo in Italia o un Bertolaso in Lombardia. Un militare, un carabiniere, un marinaio, l’importante — sottolinea — è che la catena di comando sia unica». Di Viminale invece Salvini non parla, sebbene nessuno — neanche fra i suoi — dubiti che ambisca a tornarci”. (affaritaliani.it)

He says it’s not about climate. So why is Bill Gates investing in farmland?

 

He says it’s not about climate. So why is Bill Gates investing in farmland?

August 27, 2021

Rebecca Bauer is head of public relations and communication at FarmTogether, based in San Francisco, US. The views expressed in this guest article are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those AFN.


For many investors, farmland was not on the radar as an investable asset class until earlier this year, when it was revealed that the largest owners of US farmland were none other than Bill and Melinda Gates.

Many were speculating about Gates’ motivation for the acquisitions – was it part of his larger sustainability strategy? As it happens, Gates says these investments are, in fact, not connected to climate. This might have surprised some – even the most savvy investors. But to those familiar with farmland, it’s easy to see why this asset class is so attractive for investors.

Institutional investors are hungry for farmland

For many years, farmland was not a common asset class among financial investors. Even after alternative investments became widespread, few funds looked carefully at the sector. Numerous barriers to entry stood in the way, including a highly fragmented market in which most farmland was family-owned; and a lack of investment professionals with the knowledge to value farmland investments.

The tide began to shift in the early 2000s, when institutional investors began to give farmland a closer look. Momentum accelerated during the 2008-2009 Great Financial Crisis, when investors grew desperate for alternatives to traditional safe haven investments like bonds and gold. In this short period of time, there was a proliferation in funds that were specifically focused on farmland investing. In 2020, there were 166 such funds globally, nearly a 9x increase from only 19 in 2005.

Farmland-focused investment funds, 2005-2020. Source: Valoral Advisors

The Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America-College Retirement Equities Fund, for example, holds $1.2 trillion in farmland assets through its asset management arm, Nuveen.

Bill Gates’ investments in farmland can be seen as part of this trend. The Gates’ have been quietly acquiring farmland through their investment manager, Cascade Investment, for over 10 years. When the fund was profiled by The Wall Street Journal in 2014, it was already a significant farmland investor, with “at least 100,000 acres of farmland in California, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, and other states.”

Following that profile, Cascade has made several other large farmland investments. In 2017, they paid the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) $520 million for a portfolio of farmland that had previously been owned by the Agricultural Company of America (AgCoA). When CPPIB acquired AgCoA’s portfolio in 2013, it was one of the largest institutional investors in row crop farmland in the US. Another notable acquisition was Cascade’s $170 million purchase of 14,500 acres of farmland in Washington state from John Hancock Life Insurance in 2018.

Today, Bill Gates owns 242,000 acres of farmland in 19 states. In addition, he owns 25,750 acres of transitional land and 1,234 acres of recreational land for total land holdings of 268,984 acres. His largest holding is in Louisiana (69,071 acres), followed by Arkansas (47,927 acres) and Arizona (25,750 acres).

Farmland delivers solid returns to investors

Farmland has historically delivered strong real returns from two distinct sources: rental and crop payments, and appreciation when the underlying asset is sold. Between 1992 and 2020, the average annual return from farmland was 10.9%, compared to 7.87% for the stock market and 6% for gold. In addition, farmland is an extremely low-volatility asset class. In this same time period, the volatility for farmland was 6.84% while the volatility of the stock market was 16.9% and gold was 14.8%.

NB: Data are based on annual total returns from January 1 1992 through December 31 2020. Asset classes are represented by the following indexes: privately-held US farmland – NCREIF Farmland Index; privately-held US commercial real estate – NCREIF Real Estate Index. Indexes are unmanaged and unavailable for direct investment. Source: NCREIF, publicly available data

Farmland also adds diversification to a portfolio, which is crucial for building long-term wealth. Investors achieve diversification through investing in multiple uncorrelated asset classes. Farmland is uncorrelated with other major asset classes including stocks, bonds, and gold, meaning that it is not impacted by shocks which affect the price of other assets. For example, during the Covid-19 pandemic, the stock market decreased by 19.8% between Q4 2019 and Q1 2020. In contrast, farmland decreased by 0.1% – only its second negative quarter since 1992.

Farmland is a sustainable asset class

Despite sustainable agricultural development being one of the key focus areas for his nonprofit Gates Foundation, the Microsoft co-founder claims that his farmland investments are not tied to climate. But while Gates might be solely focused on returns, one should not overlook farmland investing’s potential to drive sustainability on a massive scale.

Bill and Melinda Gates can create world’s biggest agrifoodtech testbed – but they need to win over farmers first. Read more here

High-tech and sustainable approaches are needed to ensure that farmers will be capable of meeting the agricultural needs of the 21st century and the planet’s growing population, amid a changing climate and increasingly scarce resources. These sustainable and productivity-enhancing improvements include organic or nature-based farming methods, water conservation, and other agronomic innovations to improve the efficiency of farms. Despite these methods gaining popularity, however, many of the transitions are prohibitively costly for farmers.

It’s here that investments play a crucial role. By providing an injection of cash, farmland investors are facilitating much-needed capital improvements and increasing the sustainability of farms long-term.

Plus, sustainably managed farmland will reinforce the land’s value overtime. Farms with healthy soils, ample water, and efficient infrastructure are worth more, and this will be more true in a future where high-quality farmland is increasingly scarce.

You no longer need Gates levels of wealth to reap the benefits of farmland

For too long, farmland investing has been restricted to a handful of institutional investors and ultra-high net worth individuals like the Gates’ due to high barriers to entry – including opaque markets and large minimum investments. Fortunately, this is no longer the case.

Crowdfunding investment platforms, for example, allow accredited investors to own a portion of farmland with low minimums starting at just $15,000. These platforms eliminate many of the barriers to investing in farmland and offer access to a selection of investment opportunities, ranging from apples to nuts and citrus.

Another way to invest in farmland, although not direct, is to invest in real estate investment trusts (REITs) such as Farmland Partners, or ag commodity ETFs. While these funds expose investors to a few of the benefits of farmland, they are ultimately tied to the stock market and its unpredictable swings.

The potential reasons behind Gates’ farmland investments are broad. From its vital role in the global food supply to its historically strong financial performance, farmland can play a significant role in any portfolio. Now, it’s easier than ever to invest – even without being one of the richest men on the planet.

Join the Newsletter

Get the latest news & research from AFN and AgFunder in your inbox.

* indicates required

AgFunder Newsletters & Research

Get the latest news in your inbox. Weekly.

* indicates required

Follow us:

Advertisement
Advertisement

Lettera aperta al signor Luigi di Maio, deputato del Popolo Italiano

LIBERARE L'ITALIA COMINCIA DAL LIBERARE CIASCUNO DI NOI DALLA PRIGIONE DIGITALE COSTRUITA INTORNO A NOI

  SielteID Avviso revoca imminente per inattività Gentile XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, tra 30 giorni la tua identità digitale verrà revocata a segu...

Lettori fissi