CBDC ED INTRUSIONE DELLE BANCHE NELL'UTILIZZAZIONE DEI VOSTRI SOLDI ILLEGALE IN BASE AL DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE (ILO). E, QUINDI, L'EURO DIGITALE E LE CBDC, POSSONO ESSERE LEGALI? ALLE BOCCE ATTUALI, NO.

  https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO:12100:P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312240:NO

C095 - Protection of Wages Convention, 1949 (No. 95)

22 Oct 1952

In Force

Article 3

1. 1. Wages payable in money shall be paid only in legal tender, and payment in the form of promissory notes, vouchers or coupons, or in any other form alleged to represent legal tender, shall be prohibited.
2. 2. The competent authority may permit or prescribe the payment of wages by bank cheque or postal cheque or money order in cases in which payment in this manner is customary or is necessary because of special circumstances, or where a collective agreement or arbitration award so provides, or, where not so provided, with the consent of the worker concerned.

Article 6

Employers shall be prohibited from limiting in any manner the freedom of the worker to dispose of his wages.

Article 7

1. 1. Where works stores for the sale of commodities to the workers are established or services are operated in connection with an undertaking, the workers concerned shall be free from any coercion to make use of such stores or services.
2. 2. Where access to other stores or services is not possible, the competent authority shall take appropriate measures with the object of ensuring that goods are sold and services provided at fair and reasonable prices, or that stores established and services operated by the employer are not operated for the purpose of securing a profit but for the benefit of the workers concerned.

Article 8

1. 1. Deductions from wages shall be permitted only under conditions and to the extent prescribed by national laws or regulations or fixed by collective agreement or arbitration award.
2. 2. Workers shall be informed, in the manner deemed most appropriate by the competent authority, of the conditions under which and the extent to which such deductions may be made.

Article 9

Any deduction from wages with a view to ensuring a direct or indirect payment for the purpose of obtaining or retaining employment, made by a worker to an employer or his representative or to any intermediary (such as a labour contractor or recruiter), shall be prohibited.

Article 10

1. 1. Wages may be attached or assigned only in a manner and within limits prescribed by national laws or regulations.
2. 2. Wages shall be protected against attachment or assignment to the extent deemed necessary for the maintenance of the worker and his family.

QUINDI, I REDDITI MONETARI DI TUTTI I LAVORATORI DEL SETTORE PUBBLICO (DATORI DI LAVORO PUBBLICI) SONO TUTTI ESENTI DALL'ESSERE ESPRIMIBILI IN CBDC, IN QUANTO LA CBDC PER DEFINIZIONE E' UN VOUCHER (NON UNA MONETA VERA E PROPRIA), CHE CONSENTE AL SISTEMA BANCARIO E FINANZIARIO DI TELEGUIDARE A DISTANZA COME SPENDERE ED EVENTUALMENTE VIETARE LA SPESA SE LA SPESA NON E' COME DICONO LORO.

PER QUANTO RIGUARDA I DIPENDENTI DI DATORI DI LAVORO PRIVATI VALE LA STESSA COSA, IN QUANTO QUESTA NORMA ILO E' STATA FORMULATA COME NORMA IMPERATIVA INDEROGABILE PER GLI STATI E PER I DATORI DI LAVORO. LA POSIZIONE GIURIDICA PIU' DEBOLE (IN MERITO AL RISCHIO CBDC) E' QUELLA DI CHI HA REDDITI MONETARI NON DA LAVORO, TIPO REDDITI DA CAPITALE, AFFITTI ECC.

QUALSIASI CDBC VIOLA QUESTA CONVENZIONE ILO, RATIFICATA DA QUASI TUTTI GLI STATI MEMBRI DELL'ILO (QUASI TUTTI GLI STATI DEL MONDO: DETTAGLI SUL SITO ILO).

C029 - Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29)

The original text of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29) made reference to a transitional period during which recourse to forced or compulsory labour might be had subject to specific conditions, as set out in Article 1, paragraphs 2 and 3, and Articles 3 to 24. Over the years, the Governing Body, the International Labour Conference but also the ILO supervisory bodies, such as the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations, acknowledged that these provisions, commonly known as “transitional provisions” were no longer applicable. In 2014, the International Labour Conference adopted a Protocol to Convention No.29, which expressly provided for the deletion of the transitional provisions. The text below reflects this deletion. The original text of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29) may be accessed here.

Display in: French - Spanish - Arabic - German - Dutch - Portuguese - Russian - Vietnamese - Chinese

Go to article : 1 2 3 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33

Preamble

The General Conference of the International Labour Organisation,

Having been convened at Geneva by the Governing Body of the International Labour Office, and having met in its Fourteenth Session on 10 June 1930, and

Having decided upon the adoption of certain proposals with regard to forced or compulsory labour, which is included in the first item on the agenda of the Session, and

Having determined that these proposals shall take the form of an international Convention,

adopts this twenty-eighth day of June of the year one thousand nine hundred and thirty the following Convention, which may be cited as the Forced Labour Convention, 1930, for ratification by the Members of the International Labour Organisation in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of the International Labour Organisation:

Article 1

1. 1. Each Member of the International Labour Organisation which ratifies this Convention undertakes to suppress the use of forced or compulsory labour in all its forms within the shortest possible period.
2. 2. [deleted pursuant to Article 7 of the Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, 1930]
3. 3. [deleted pursuant to Article 7 of the Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, 1930]

Article 2

1. 1. For the purposes of this Convention the term forced or compulsory labour shall mean all work or service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily.
2. 2. Nevertheless, for the purposes of this Convention, the term forced or compulsory labour shall not include--
• (a) any work or service exacted in virtue of compulsory military service laws for work of a purely military character;
• (b) any work or service which forms part of the normal civic obligations of the citizens of a fully self-governing country;
• (c) any work or service exacted from any person as a consequence of a conviction in a court of law, provided that the said work or service is carried out under the supervision and control of a public authority and that the said person is not hired to or placed at the disposal of private individuals, companies or associations;
• (d) any work or service exacted in cases of emergency, that is to say, in the event of war or of a calamity or threatened calamity, such as fire, flood, famine, earthquake, violent epidemic or epizootic diseases, invasion by animal, insect or vegetable pests, and in general any circumstance that would endanger the existence or the well-being of the whole or part of the population;
• (e) minor communal services of a kind which, being performed by the members of the community in the direct interest of the said community, can therefore be considered as normal civic obligations incumbent upon the members of the community, provided that the members of the community or their direct representatives shall have the right to be consulted in regard to the need for such services.

ANCHE I "DATORI" DI LAVORO IN UN SISTEMA CBDC SAREBBERO SOGGETTI ALLE STESSE CONDIZIONI MONETARIE DI CONSUMATORI E LAVORATORI. QUINDI, IL SISTEMA BANCARIO, OLTRE CHE PILOTARE GLI ACQUISTI SUI MERCATI DEI FATTORI PRODUTTIVI QUALI LAVORO E  CAPITALE UMANO, AVREBBE ANCHE IL POTERE DI INTERDIRE E DI CANCELLARE SPESE .PER QUALSIASI FATTORE DI PRODUZIONE (=LAVORATRICE/LAVORATORE).

 CIO' CONDURREBBE ALL'INTRODUZIONE DEL LAVORO INVOLONTARIO, FORZATO, CHE IN BASE A QUESTA CONVENZIONE E' ILLEGALE.

SI CAPISCE DA SE' CHE L'INTRODUZIONE DELLE CBDC IMPLICA L'ABOLIZIONE DI FATTO DI TUTTI I MERCATI DEI FATTORI DI PRODUZIONE, DEL CONCETTO DI ECONOMIA CONCORRENZIALE E, OVVIAMENTE, QUALSIASI DIRITTO DEI CONSUMATORI, IN PRIMIS NEI CONFRONTI DI BANCHE, ASSICURAZIONI E FINANZIARIE.

QUELLO CHE DEVE SUCCEDERE E' IL CONTRARIO: DEVE SPARIRE IL SISTEMA BANCARIO PRIVATO A DUE LIVELLI, OVUNQUE NEL MONDO.