Nuovi aggiornamenti sul vaccino Moderna. La Sveziaha infatti annunciato lo stop a tempo indeterminato della somministrazione del vaccino Moderna per tutte le persone sotto i 30 anni.
Rischio miocardite troppo alto per i giovani
L’annuncio è arrivato dall’autorità sanitaria svedese, a causa di quello che riferiscono essere un rischio aumentato di miocarditi e pericarditi, in particolare per i giovani uomini sotto i 30 anni. Si tratta di un aggiornamento rispetto alla decisione precedente, che aveva visto la Svezia sospendere inizialmente Moderna fino al 1 dicembre.
Le autorità sanitarie svedesi riferiscono che la decisione si basa su dati raccolti nel corso degli ultimi mesi che tuttavia non sono ancora stati pubblicati su riviste scientifiche.
Non ‘è chiaro rapporto rischio beneficio
Tuttavia già la pubblicistica esistente dimostra come il rischio di miocardite post vaccino aumenti al diminuire dell’età. Era stato lo stesso virologo Roberto Burioni a citare recente il lavoro scientifico condotto in Israele su un campione di 2,5 milioni di persone. La ricerca aveva riportato 2,5 casi di miocarditi ogni 100mila somministrazioni, cifra che tuttavia quadruplicava guardando gli under 30.
Lì, i casi arrivavano a 10 ogni 100mila somministrazioni. Secondo la Svezia il rischio di complicanze da Covid per i giovani sarebbe quindi altrettanto basso di un potenziale effetto avverso da vaccino e per questo motivo non esisterebbe un chiaro rapporto rischio beneficio.
Le differenze tra Nord Europa e Italia
La decisione svedese segue quindi la linea di prudenza che diversi altri Paesi del nord Europa stanno decidendo di adottare per la gestione della campagna di vaccinazione. Lo stop a Moderna per i giovani era infatti recentemente arrivato anche in Finlandia, in Danimarca e in Norvegia.
Paesi a cui si era poi unita anche l’Islanda lo scorso 9 ottobre, dove il vaccino Moderna è stato bloccato non solo per i giovani, ma per tutti i cittadini. Si tratta di un approccio completamente diverso rispetto a quello adottato in Italia, dove i vaccini sono stati presentati da sempre come unica arma di salvezza per il Covid per qualsiasi cittadino di qualsiasi età.
Nei Paesi nordici invece si è deciso di tenere conto della natura asimmetrica del virus, che colpisce con particolare pericolosità persone con un’età media di circa 81 anni, passando invece nei nella grande maggioranza dei casi in maniera asintomatica o paucisintomatica.
Uno scenario confermato in tutti i bollettini forniti dall’Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Vietando Moderna per gli under 30 si prende atto che il Covid non rappresenta un pericolo imminente per i giovani, evitando di sottoporli ad un farmaco sui cui effetti a medio e lungo termine c’è ancora molto da scoprire.
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by
activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of
our home page (Desktop version).
Is a new worldwide lockdown envisaged as a means to combating the “dangerous” Covid variant entitled “Delta”?
The fear campaign has once more gone into high gear.
Let me briefly review the history of this crisis.
There is a sequence of outright lies and fabrications used to
justify far-reaching policy decisions in the course of the last 18
months.
The biggest lie, which is firmly acknowledged both by scientific opinion and the WHO is that the RT-PCR test used to “detect” the spread of the virus (as well as the variants) is not only flawed but TOTALLY INVALID. (Michel Chossudovsky, Chapter III)
From the outset in January 2020, all far-reaching policy
decisions upheld and presented to the public as a “means to saving
lives” were based on flawed and invalid RT-PCR case positives coupled with false mortality data pertaining to Covid-19 related deaths: Tn the US “The underlying Cause of death” is Covid-19 “more often or not” (CDC). No autopsy required.
These Covid “estimates” were used to justify confinement, social
distancing, the face mask, the prohibition of social gatherings,
cultural and sports events, the closure of economic activity.
The crisis was marked by several important phases:
1. Crisis in Air Travel and International Transport
The calling of a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) by the WHO Director General on January 30, 2020 was instrumental in launching the coronal crisis. There were 83 positive cases outside China out of a population of 6.4 billion. There was no emergency: Ironically, the flawed and invalid RT-PCR test was used to estimate those 83 positive cases.
On the following day president Trump’s ordered the closing down of air travel with China which marked the onset of a crisis in International Air Travel and Transport which
has extended its grip over a period of 18 months leading to the
bankruptcy of airline companies Worldwide, the destruction of the
tourist industry, a major crisis in commodity trade, etc. This was a
deliberate act to précipitate the demise of Air Travel Worldwide. There
were 5 positive cases in the US, which were used to justify Trump’s
decision on January 31st, 2020.
2. The February Financial Crash on February 20, 2020
It was the most serious financial crisis
in World history, far surpassing that of 1929. It occurred immediately
following “warnings” by the WHO that a covid-19 pandemic was imminent,
thereby spearheading the fear campaign. There was ample evidence of
outright “conflict of interest” and fraud including foreknowledge,
inside information, etc. which resulted in a massive concentration of
money wealth by a handful of billionaires. That same day, millions of
people Worldwide lost their lifelong savings. What was the justification
for the WHO’s shock and awe statements. This imminent threat was based
on 1078 (flawed) RT-PCR Covid positive cases outside China.
3. Barely three weeks later, the March 11, 2020 lockdown
with 44,279 cases Worldwide outside China were used to justify home
confinement, social distancing and the closure of economic activity
Worldwide leading to poverty and mass unemployment.
And then in early November 2020 it was the launching of the MRNA
“Killer Vaccine” which has resulted in a trend of mortality and
morbidity. See the latest figures below.
EU/EEA/Switzerland to 28 August 2021 – 23,252 Covid-19 injection related deaths and 2,166,285 injuries, per EudraVigilance Database.
UK to 18 August 2021 – 1,609 Covid-19 injection related deaths and 1,165,636 injuries, per MHRA Yellow Card Scheme.
USA to 20 August 2021 – 13,627 Covid-19 injection related deathsand 2,932,001 injuries, per VAERS database.
TOTAL for EU/UK/USA – 38,488 Covid-19 injection related deaths and 6,263,922 injuries reported as at 30 August 2021.
Nota Bene: It is
important to be aware that the official figures above (reported to the
health authorities) are but a small percentage of the actual figures.
Furthermore, people continue to die (and suffer injury) from the
injections with every day which passes. See D4CE Statement
The Delta Variant and “The Fourth Wave”
Starting in May-June 2021 extending in October , we have the Delta Variant. It’s the new talking point.
The alleged dangers of the Delta Variant are being used to speed up
the vaccination program as well as the imposition of the vaccine
passport.
“A Fourth Wave” has been announced.
Is a second Worlwide lockdown on the drawing board, requiring stay at
home confinement, social distancing and the closure of
economic activity coupled with another devastating financial crash
similar to that which occurred on Black Thursday March 12, 2020?
The Deadly Variants Sustained by Media Disinformation and Fake Science
Media disinformation is a deadly weapon which sustains 24/7 the illusion of a dangerous SARS-2 Delta Variant.
First identified last year in India, The SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant was
“thought to have driven the deadly second wave of infections this
summer in India”. According to so-called “scientific opinion” it is now
said to be spreading worldwide, to some 80 countries.
“Here’s the deal: The Delta variant is
more contagious, it’s deadlier, and it’s spreading quickly around the
world – leaving young, unvaccinated people more vulnerable than ever.”
That’s a lie. The original virus categorized by the WHO and the CDC
as “similar to seasonal influenza” is not a killer virus. Moreover,
virus variants are always “less vigilant” and “less dangerous” than the
original virus.
Joe Biden’s proposed “solution” is “the Killer Vaccine”, which has
already in the course of the last seven months resulted in countless
deaths and injuries:
“Please, get vaccinated if you haven’t already. Let’s head off this strain before it’s too late.” (emphasis added)
Health authorities are now claiming that the new cases of the Delta B1.617 variant, increase the risk of hospitalization by 2.7 times.
Image on the right: Neil Ferguson (Source: Financial Times)
Ferguson’s March 2020 mathematical model
based on “predictions” of 600,000 deaths in the UK borders on ridicule.
It’s more than a lie. It’s a crime against humanity. It was used by the
financial establishment as a justification to trigger economic and
social chaos Worldwide. Ferguson’s endeavors have been generously funded
by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
The stated intent was to protect people against V the Virus. The
March 11 lockdown was followed by the Black Thursday “financial crash”
(March 12, 2020), which created havoc on stock markets Worldwide. The
March 11, 2020 lockdown was heralded as a means to containing the
alleged “pandemic”. Nonsense.
“Mathematical Model” in Support of a “Fourth Wave”
And now a second authoritative “mathematical model” has been put forth to “justify” another lockdown.
The same “scientist” (Ferguson) has been called upon to design a new “mathematical model” which is being used to justify a “Fourth Wave Lockdown”.
The erroneous “assumption” behind the modelling exercise is that the Delta Variant is “deadly”.
“New modelling for the government’s SAGE committee of experts [to which Ferguson belongs] has highlighted the risk of a “substantial third wave” of infections and hospitalisations, ….” The official outlook is “now more pessimistic”. (BBC Report, June 2021, emphasis added).
According to Prof Neil Ferguson:
“the Delta variant of coronavirus is 30% to 100% more transmissible than the previously dominant variant”. (quoted by the Guardian).
Where does Ferguson get his data and estimates? The flawed and invalid RT-PCR test?
What he fails to mention is that virus variants are always
“less vigilant” and “less dangerous” in comparison to the
original virus. And how does he establish the “identity” of the original
virus?
Both British and UK officials are intimating the possibility of a Fourth Wave lockdown, tentatively scheduled for Autumn.
According to Britain’s chief medical officer Professor Chris Whitty (member of the SAGE Committee)
“The NHS needs to brace itself for another difficult winter ahead, with the possibility of a further “very significant Covid surge”.
According to the SPI-M modelling sub-group of the government’s SAGE panel (to which Whitty and Ferguson belong):
“restrictions would have to be reintroduced”. … the Delta variant posed a “higher risk of hospitalisations”
These announcements are frivolous. Their intent is to justify drastic
policy measures (lockdown, mask, social distancing, closure of economic
activity, disruption of health services) as well as the speeding up of
the vaccination programme and the repression of the protest movement.
Moreover, the statements by British, US and EU health officials
regarding the so-called spread of “the more infectious Delta variant”
are now also being used to justify the implementation of “Fourth Wave”
lockdown policies internationally in a large number of countries.
The World Economic Forum to the Rescue
The World Economic Forum (WEF) which represents the financial elites,
played a key role in the launching of the March 11, 2020 lockdown. And
now what they are saying is that another devastating Worldwide economic and social crisis is likely to occur in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The WEF is now pointing to:
“A cyber-attack with COVID-like characteristics”, which promises to be far more devastating and chaotic than the Covid-19 pandemic.
The World Economic Forum’s “Concept 2021”. Cyber Polygon Scenario
In recent developments, the World Economic Forum (WEF) which co-sponsored Event 201,
the table top simulation of the corona pandemic together with John
Hopkins and the Gates Foundation in October 2019, is now involved in
another strategic exercise entitled Concept 2021. The
latter is described as an “international capacity building initiative
aimed at raising the global cyber resilience”. It is not a table top
simulation comparable to Event 201.
Last year it was conducted at the height of the lockdown via video conferencing. This year the 2021 Conference “discussed the “key risks of digitalisation”.
Those participating in the Cyber Polygon Exercise (2020)included high
tech companies including IBM, numerous banks and financial
institutions, internet companies, cyber security agencies, corporate and
government media, think tanks, law enforcement agencies including
Interpol with representatives from 48 countries.
The exercise is an obvious means to secure reliable partners and
develop strategic alliances. In this regard, there were numerous
representatives from Russia and countries of the former Soviet Union,
including major Russian banking interests, communications and media
companies. All in all 42 partners. No corporate /governmental partner from China.
There was also a training program with 200 teams from 48 countries.
WEF Video
Klaus Schwab, founder and Executive Director of the WEF and architect of the “Great Reset” describes the crisis scenario as follows:
“The frightening
scenario of a comprehensive cyber attack could bring a complete halt to
the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a
whole. The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyberattack.” (emphasis added)
Jeremy Jurgens, WEF Managing Director:
“I believe that there will be another crisis. It will be more significant. It will be faster than what we’ve seen with COVID.
The impact will be greater, and as a result the economic and social
implications will be even more significant.” (emphasis added)
The implications of these bold “predictions” which represent the interests of the financial establishment are far-reaching.
What they describe is a scenario of economic and social chaos
involving the disruption of communications systems, the internet,
financial and money transactions (including SWIFT), the power grid,
global transportation, commodity trade, etc., as well as likely
“geopolitical dislocations”.
The opening session (July 2021) of Cyber Polygon 2021 was conducted (video below) by the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Mikhail Mishustin together with the Director General of the WEF Klaus Schwab.
Is this scenario a dress rehearsal for a forthcoming cyber crisis?
Why was China excluded from the Cyber Polygon Exercise? The major partners were from the former Soviet block.
Video. The Opening Session (July 2021).
The Simulation conducted in July 2021 is entitled Cyber Polygon 2021
Is a “Cyber Attack Scenario” contemplated by the financial establishment?
While one cannot speculate, the matter must nonetheless be addressed.
The Delta Variant
Will the “deadly” Delta Variant be used as a pretext to justify the
launching of a new phase of the corona crisis, resulting in a further
process of billionaire enrichment coupled with rising public and private
debts, inflation, unemployment and poverty?
Moreover, at this juncture of an unfolding crisis, governments and
the media are now engaged in a fear campaign largely focussing on the
“deadly” SARS-CoV-2 variants.
With a view to saving lives, the health authorities are intimating
that if the Variants are not brought under control, a major lockdown
should be contemplated.
This narrative is based on outright lies and distortions. There is no
scientific evidence derived from the flawed and invalid RT-PCR test
which confirms the existence of the alleged deadly SARS-CoV-2
“Variants”.
Is the Covid Agenda Part of A U.S. Hegemonic Project?
Is the covid crisis engineered by the financial establishment part of
a hegemonic project, pertaining to control over strategic sectors of
the global economy as described by the WEF director general Klaus Schwab?
It’s an act of economic warfare?
It’s “imperialism with a human face”, committed to “saving lives”.
Visibly, it is part of President Joe Biden’s foreign policy agenda. It has geopolitical and strategic implications.
US intelligence and the Pentagon (including DARPA) as well as NATO
are directly or indirectly involved in the corona crisis. Cyber Warfare
is already on the drawing-board.
The March 11, 2020 Lockdown leading to closure of national economies
Worldwide has also been instrumental in destabilizing several
countries which are categorized as “Enemies of America”.
No need for Washington to impose piecemeal sanctions on Iran,
Venezuela and Cuba. These countries have endorsed the covid narrative.
They have accepted the “ultimate sanction”, namely the closure of their national economy as a means to combating “V the virus”.
The situation in Cuba is particularly dramatic. Resulting from the
March 2020 lockdown, Cuba’s tourist industry which constitutes the
country’s main source of foreign exchange is destroyed. Since the 1980s,
the forex revenues from tourism have been used to import food. And now
as a result of the closure of the tourist industry, Cuba is experiencing
serious food shortages.
Yet the Cuban government has accepted the “Big Lie” and has endorsed
the lockdown which is literally destroying the achievements of the Cuban
Revolution.
And unfortunately progressive intellectuals are totally blind. They
are not only supportive of the Covid narrative, they fail to understand
how the Covid lockdown policies as well as the deadly mRNA vaccine are
being used to destabilize and destroy countries one after the other.
These countries are now fully controlled by Western creditors and the
billionaire foundations.
Engineered economic and social chaos. Is that not part of a US hegemonic project?
Bastille 2.0: “Real Regime Change”
What is the solution? The complexities of this crisis must be addressed including the power structures of global capitalism.
What must also be understood are the astute mechanisms including
threats and bribes which are used systematically to take control not
only of corrupt politicians but of the entire governmental fabric of
what used to be “sovereign countries”.
Is a second Worldwide lockdown contemplated? We must ensure that it
does not take place, which means that we must confront the powers of
so-called “global governance”.
Protest movements must question the legitimacy of both the financial actors as wells the politicians in high office:
The legitimacy of politicians and their powerful corporate sponsors must be questioned,
including the police state measures adopted to enforce the closure of
economic activity, the imposition of a digital vaccine passport as well
as the wearing of the face mask, social distancing, etc.
This network must be established
(nationally and internationally) at all levels of society, in towns and
villages, work places, parishes. Trade unions, farmers organizations,
professional associations, business associations, student unions,
veterans associations, church groups would be called upon to integrate
this movement.
The first task would be to
disable the fear campaign and media disinformation as well put an end to
Big Pharma’s Covid vaccination programme.
The corporate media should be directly
challenged, without specifically targeting mainstream journalists, many
of whom have been instructed to abide by the official narrative. This
endeavour would require a parallel process at the grassroots level, of
sensitizing and educating fellow citizens on the nature of virus, the
impacts of the vaccine and the lockdown.
“Spreading the word” through social media
and independent online media outlets will be undertaken bearing in mind
that Google as well as Facebook are instruments of censorship.
The creation of such a movement, which
forcefully challenges the legitimacy of the financial elites as well as
the structures of political authority at the national level, is no easy
task. It will require a degree of solidarity, unity and commitment unparalleled in World history.
It will also require breaking down political and ideological barriers within society (i.e. between political parties) and acting with a single voice.
We must also understand that the “corona
project” is an integral part of the U.S. imperial agenda. It has
geopolitical and strategic implications. It will also require eventually
unseating the architects of this diabolical “pandemic” and indicting
them for crimes against humanity. (Michel Chossudovsky, December 2020. With some minor changes)
What is required is a “real regime change”, the restoration of democracy and what used to be called “The Welfare State”.
Solidarity must prevails. A complex task and commitment ahead for all humanity.
About the Author
Michel Chossudovsky
is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics (emeritus) at the
University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on
Globalization (CRG), Montreal, Editor of Global Research.
He has undertaken field research in Latin America, Asia, the
Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and the Pacific and has written
extensively on the economies of developing countries with a focus on
poverty and social inequality. He has also undertaken research in Health
Economics (UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean
(ECLAC), UNFPA, CIDA, WHO, Government of Venezuela, John Hopkins International Journal of Health Services (1979, 1983)
He is the author of twelve books including The Globalization of
Poverty and The New World Order (2003), America’s “War on
Terrorism” (2005), The Globalization of War, America’s Long War against
Humanity (2015).
He is a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. His
writings have been published in more than twenty languages. In 2014, he
was awarded the Gold Medal for Merit of the Republic of Serbia for his
writings on NATO’s war of aggression against Yugoslavia. He can be
reached at crgeditor@yahoo.com
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below.
Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to
your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
The original source of this article is Global Research
New concerns are being raised about side effects from the Moderna vaccine against the coronavirus.
Swedish health officials have now decided that a moratorium on giving the Moderna vaccine to anyone under 31 will be extended indefinitely, the U.K. Daily Mail reported. The pause on the Moderna shots had been scheduled to end on Dec. 1.
Finland, Iceland and Denmark have taken similar steps. Norway is encouraging men under 30 not to get the Moderna shot, but is not mandating it.
For months, the Moderna vaccine has been under scrutiny because of data that shows young men who receive it are at increased risk for myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis, an inflammation of the sac around the heart.
The Daily Mail reported that one U.S. study that has not yet been peer-reviewed concluded that “young males under [age] 20 are up to six times more likely to develop myocarditis after contracting COVID-19 than those who have been vaccinated.”
The decision comes as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is putting Moderna’s plans for a shot aimed at the population from age 12 to 17 on hold due to concerns over risks of the ailments, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Although a federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention panel on Thursday approved boosters for the Moderna and Johnson & Johson vaccines, there were some cautions raised, according to CNBC.
Dr. Tom Shimabukuro said there is an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with either the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine, in particular after the second dose of the vaccines.
According to the Daily Mail, the data indicated the risk was 13 times greater for those getting the Moderna vaccine than for those who got the Pfizer vaccine.
Sweden’s Public Health Agency said the unpublished data linking the Moderna vaccine with the two conditions means there is “an increased risk of side effects such as inflammation of the heart muscle or the pericardium.”
“The risk of being affected is very small.”That data has not been publicly released.
The FDA had addressed concern about the Pfizer vaccine in its statement giving it full authorization, saying that “the data demonstrate increased risks, particularly within the seven days following the second dose.”
“The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age compared to females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age,” the FDA said.
The agency noted that “some individuals required intensive care support” and that long-term information about the risks is not yet available.
The Western Journal has published this article in the interest of shedding light on stories about the COVID-19 vaccine that are largely unreported by the establishment media. In that same spirit, according to the most recent statistics from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 7,439 deaths have been reported among those who received a vaccine, or 20 out of every 1,000,000. By contrast, 652,480 deaths from COVID-19 have been reported by the CDC, or 16,101 out of every 1,000,000. In addition, it must be noted that VAERS reports can be filed by anyone and are unverified by the CDC. Thus, as the agency notes, “Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem.” The decision of whether to receive a COVID vaccine is a personal one, but it is important to consider context when making that decision. — Ed. note
Sudan, fonti locali: "Un commando militare ha arrestato il Primo ministro e il responsabile dei media"
Proteste in Sudan (ansa)
Secondo quanto riportato da Al Hadath, "gruppi armanti non identificati si sono introdotti nelle case di Hamdok e del suo media advisor e poi li hanno arrestati"
1 MINUTI DI LETTURA
Il primo ministro sudanese Abdallah Hamdok è stato messo agli arresti domiciliari da un commando militare non identificato, che si è introdotto in casa sua. Lo ha riferito nella notte Al Hadath TV, ripresa poi dall'agenzia Reuters. Secondo la stessa fonte, con identica modalità operativa i militari avrebbero arrestato anche il consigliere per i media del primo ministro. [Notizia in aggiornamento]
Post
